1 / 14

Overview of Solvency II

Overview of Solvency II. Moscow, 25 March 2008. CEA’s Member Associations. Source CEA. 33 national member associations: 27 EU Member States + 6 Non-EU Markets Switzerland, Iceland, Norway, Turkey, Liechtenstein, Croatia 3 Observers Russia Ukraine AISAM . Source CEA. About CEA.

hanh
Télécharger la présentation

Overview of Solvency II

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Overview of Solvency II Moscow, 25 March 2008

  2. CEA’s Member Associations Source CEA 33 national member associations: 27 EU Member States + 6 Non-EU Markets Switzerland, Iceland, Norway, Turkey, Liechtenstein, Croatia 3 Observers Russia Ukraine AISAM Source CEA

  3. About CEA • Brussels-based, founded in 1953 • Active at European and International levels • 33 member bodies - national insurance associations • CEA represents all types of insurance and reinsurance undertakings • pan-European companies, monoliners, mutuals & SMEs • CEA represents 94% of total European insurance premiums  

  4. Why a new Solvency framework ? • Solvency regimes need to evolve to ensure appropriate consumer protection and efficient capital allocation • Solvency I disadvantages • Rules can conflict with good risk management • Capital is not adequately directed to risks • A lack of harmonisation across the EU • Lack of recognition of groups’ economic reality • Europe is ready for a better and more appropriate risk based solvency regime which can transform compliance in value creation

  5. Objectives of Solvency II The Industry shares the objectives set out for Solvency II • Improve protection of policyholders and beneficiaries • A major step forward from Solvency I supported by the new economic perspective: earlier identification of crises • Allowing all policyholders to have the same level of protection, independently of the legal status, size or location of the company • Deepen integration of the EU insurance market • Improve international competitiveness of EU insurers • Promote better regulation

  6. What is an economic risk based approach? The Industry believes that the objectives of Solvency II can only be achieved through a risk based economic approach Assets and liabilities at market-consistent values Full recognition of diversification and risk mitigation of all forms (reinsurance, securitization etc.) Aligning capital requirements with the underlying risks of an insurance company Developing a proportionate, risk-based approach to supervision with appropriate treatment both for small companies and large, cross border groups This will allow alignment of compliance with creation of value

  7. Solvency II – 3 Pillars Approach Measurement of Assets,Liabilities and Capital Supervisory ReviewProcess Market Discipline • Eligible capital • Technical provisions • Capital requirements • Asset Liability valuation • etc • Internal control • Risk management • Corporate governance • Stress testing • Disclosure requirements • Supervisory reporting In principle, no specific rules for reinsures, but recognition of nature and complexity of its risks in applying pillar I-II-III requirements

  8. Solvency II Framework Key Components • Market Consistent Value of Liabilities • Is sufficient to cover policyholder obligations • Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR) • Target Capital that an entity should aim to meet under normal operating conditions • Minimum Capital Requirement (MCR) • Reflects a level of capital below which ultimate supervisory action could be triggered • Ladder of Intervention • Solvency II should be designed to guarantee an appropriate ladder of intervention if the available capital falls below SCR Internal Model Level of SCR Ladder of Intervention Standard Approach Level of MCR Market -consistent Value of Liabilities

  9. The SCR Standard Approach SCR Correlation Operationalrisk Basic SCR Factor based Health Scenario based Non-Life Default Market Life Adjustment for Risk-mitigating effect of future profit-sharing Premium reserve Currency Expense Mortality Catastrophe Property Claims Longevity Lapse Interest rate Epidemic Expense Catastrophe Concen-tration Equity Revision Disability Spread Source: CEIOPS

  10. Solvency II Timeline 2007 2010 2006 2009 2005 2011 - 2012 2008 Implementation (Member States) Directive Development (Commission) Directive Adoption? (Council & Parliament) Level 2 & 3 finalised (EC & CEIOPS) CEIOPS advice on Proportionality & Groups CEIOPS work on Implementing Measures and Supervisory Guidance CEIOPS work on Pillar I CEIOPS work on Pillars II and III QIS 3 QIS 1 QIS 2 Further QIS QIS 4 Model Calibration • Framework Directive • QIS 4 • Principle of proportionality, own funds & groups issues • Implementing measures CEA Priorities

  11. Background documents

  12. Further reading... Key strategic publications available on the CEA website (www.cea.assur.org) include: • Introductory Guide to Solvency II A 10-pages brochure (including synthetic executive summary) introducing the main concepts of Solvency II • Proposals for a European Standard Approach – ESA for SCR The ESA aims at capturing the requirements of a consistent economic risk-based approach within a workable solution • CEA’s view on the Impact of Solvency II on the Average Level of Capital A guide on the comparison of the current Solvency I and future Solvency II frameworks • CEA Working Document on MCR and a Proposed Ladder of Intervention CEA aims to contribute to the ongoing development of critical issues such as the Minimum Capital Requirement (MCR) and proposes a methodology to calculate MCR as well as an approach to a ladder of intervention • CEA Working Paper on the risk measures VaR and TailVaR This paper discusses the issues related to using VaR and TailVaR as risk measures within the solvency assessment of insurance companies • CEA 10 Key messages on Solvency II • Solvency II Impact Assessment • Solvency II Glossary • CEA information paper on Groups and Solvency II • CEA information paper on Diversification and Specialisation benefits • CEA information paper on Small and Medium-sized Undertakings (SME)s and Solvency II

  13. Contacts • CEA Director General: Michaela Koller (Koller@cea.eu) • CEA Economics & Finance Committee SecretariatAlberto Corinti - Deputy Director General / ECOFIN Director (Corinti@cea.eu)Yannis Pitaras (Pitaras@cea.eu)Benoît Malpas (Malpas@cea.eu) • CEA Public Affairs: Gabriela Diezhandino (Diezhandino@cea.eu) Ido Bruinsma (Bruinsma@cea.eu) www.cea.eu +32 2 547 5811

  14. www.cea.eu

More Related