1 / 18

Joining up interventions for better outcomes

Joining up interventions for better outcomes. November 2009 update Jim McManus Towards a neighbourhood model for health interventions in Birmingham. Where has this come from?. This is one part of Birmingham City Council’s Health Inequalities Strategy

hanzila
Télécharger la présentation

Joining up interventions for better outcomes

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Joining up interventions for better outcomes November 2009 update Jim McManus Towards a neighbourhood model for health interventions in Birmingham

  2. Where has this come from? • This is one part of Birmingham City Council’s Health Inequalities Strategy • It works with Partners but is focused on what the Council can do • It is a part of the work of the council on • Producing a Health Inequalities Strategy • Having a senior council officer leading on health in each Department • Having a series of health interventions at local level which touch on what local authorities can do on health inequalities • Inputing into the Birmingham Health and Wellbeing Partnership

  3. Model supported by Neighbourhoods Board* Children and Young Peoples Partnership* Health and Wellbeing Partnership (BHWP)Exec* Housing and Constituencies Constituency Directors Neighbourhood Managers Be Birmingham* Police Operational Commanders & Constituency Directors joint meeting Be Birmingham task and finish group established under Moira Dumma, Chief Exec SBPCT* Current roll-out 31 Neighbourhoods managers in place Initial “induction” training complete All neighbourhood managers get a week’s training on the model in November 2009 Masterclass in baselining and target setting for neighbourhood Managers Nov 2009 Faith communities regeneration workers training November 2009 Health section within Neighbourhood plan templates devised Completed plan for each neighbourhood by Feb 2010 Current Status BHWP Summit event in January 2010 will focus on the model * indicates fora which includes NHS partners

  4. Pilot • Pilots are currently being scoped, including Castle Vale

  5. The Idea • The City Council work on a neighbourhoods approach to health with partners as part of its health inequalities programme. • There is a significant and growing evidence base for this approach from UK and European as well as US work. • This could make substantial contributions to the LAA

  6. Policy Drivers and evidence • Health status is one of the key variables in Birmingham which acts on, and is acted on by, almost every other variable • It is in every agency’s corporate plan, to some extent • Life expectancy • Neighbourhood Stress • Joining up interventions can bring additional benefits • We do not do prevention well in Birmingham

  7. The effect of place on health • The consensus from research evidence • There is a strong, independent and enduring effect of place on the health status of individuals, families, communities and neighbourhoods • Findings from JSNA • Wide variations in health outcomes by ward (statistical problems with analyses of neighbourhoods)

  8. JSNA • Mini needs assessments on health inequalities for every ward in Birmingham are available on • http://www.bhwp.nhs.uk/jsna

  9. Northfield Example

  10. Leading causes of death Common Risk Factors

  11. Life Style

  12. Environmental pollution • 57 children per 1,000 have long term lung function problems due to this • 36 children and 30 adults per 1,000 have pollution-related asthma • 1mg/m3 drop in PM air pollution could reduce CVD deaths by over 100 • As much as 30% of acute asthma attacks and hospitalisations are atttributable to air pollution • 46% of acute bronchitis admissions are attributable to air pollution

  13. So…towards a modelexplicitly designed to be as simple as possible so non-health specialists can implement it BIRMINGHAM NEIGHBOURHOOD HEALTH INTERVENTIONS MODEL Development of a local plan for each neighbourhood between partners with use of existing community networks 1. Complete a Basic health profile – identification of health issues salient for the neighbourhood by a) providing a basic profile and b) running health typologies through Customer Insight or whatever mechanism is favoured in each PCT/locality (for Ben it is PRIME/DR Foster) 2. WORK ON THE COMMON RISK FACTORS FOR BIG KILLERS Neighbourhood interventions for Diet, Physical Activity, Smoking, Alcohol, 3. IMPROVE LOCAL NEIGHBOURHOOD QUALITY Physical Environment, Green Space, Crime/ASB. INCREASE SOCIAL CONTACT BETWEEN NEIGHBOURS 4. INCREASE UPTAKE OF PREVENTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES Immunisation, Screening, This may differ from area to area depending on issues 5. Local worklessness and skills programme – deliver public health and literacy for health skills training. Develop local health trainer programmes using WNF to get people into work.

  14. Multi-Agency and BCC support Giving a clear responsibility to neighbourhoods managers to co-ordinate with health and other partners Scoping a plan for each area Allocating some WNF monies for delivery and implementation as a means of kick-starting the process and moving on from there Producing a single co-ordinated programme approach with local flavour using the model outlined above Linking this to the key health outcome issues Making it happen 1 - Process

  15. Making it happen 2 - Skills • THIS IS ALL PART OF THE ROLL OUT PLAN • Developing a clear model for prevention which is effective and evidence based • Using intervention mapping principles shown to ensure that interventions remain consistent with evidence • “real world” (doability and evidence) appraisal of candidate projects • Development and evidence appraisal of candidate projects (“proof of concept”) [both the prevention of undesirable outcomes and interventions which will deliver this efficaciously] • piloting – consider usage of a prospective case-control approach or other quasi-experimental design if ethically possible • rolling out (see Making it happen below.)

  16. Why bang on about intervention mapping? • Good prevention needs a combination of • Knowledge, Evidence, Skill and Direction • Intervention mapping is a means of ensuring an intervention is consistent with the evidence and needs assessment • It has paid dividends where it has been properly implemented, not just in health but in community safety, regeneration and other areas of work • Intervention Mapping should be a key technology for rolling out any health model. This will be a key part of the roll out of training and of plans.

  17. Tasking Models • Currently there are different tasking models for police, community safety and others • Be Birmingham has set up a task and finish group to ensure we have consistency across tasking models • The Neighbourhood health model is a model of “what” we will do. • Intervention Mapping will be the “how”.

More Related