1 / 12

Temp Groups

Capacity Delays Routes User Requirements ANSP Requirements Environment Safety. Working Arrangement agreed at CWG/1. ANC. Review by PIRGS from Performance Framework. CP. - Information Management - User Capability (Avionics) - Training (All) - ATM/CNS Infrastructure/ Capability

haroldp
Télécharger la présentation

Temp Groups

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Capacity • Delays • Routes • User Requirements • ANSP Requirements • Environment • Safety Working Arrangement agreed at CWG/1 ANC Review by PIRGS from Performance Framework CP - Information Management - User Capability (Avionics) - Training (All) - ATM/CNS Infrastructure/ Capability - Routs - Aerodormes - Human/ Economic Resources - Interoperability - Civil/Mil Requirements (incl. SUA) DCIWG OPDLWG Identify Performance and Capability Gaps WG-1 WG-n WG-1 WG-n To Assessment Phase Consider Traffic Forecast (Civil and Mil) Temp Groups Survey Joint WGs/SGs as required. Joint or concurrent meetings as possible. Consider Traffic Forecast (Civil and Mil) Prioritization

  2. This appears complicated….. hence, some explanation is needed!

  3. ANC • Job Cards • Amendments • Reports • Operational Issues Only • Job Cards • Amendments • Reports • Technical Issues Only DCIWG OPDLWG WG-1 WG-n WG-1 WG-n

  4. So far, so good…. but what about the CP itself?

  5. ANC CP DCIWG OPDLWG Temp Groups Joint WGs/SGs as required. Joint Activities

  6. What about the details?

  7. The Proposal • OPLINKP and ACP membership should be retained. • Now OPDLWG and DCIWG members respectively?? • CP on the other hand is another question. • All former ACP and OPLINKP member eligible • Suggest meetings every two years. • Fits in with Amendment cycle.

  8. Possible meeting format PLENARY = CP WGs = DCIWG, OPDLWG

  9. But before we discuss in detail, a few more quick points.

  10. ACP had numerous WGs…. • WG- M (Maintenance) was “special” • It took care of the maintenance of existing provisions. • Many manuals or Chapters of Annex 10 Vol, need occasional tweaking. • Does not justify a dedicated group; • Often resolved in one meeting. • It has been suggested that this be a direct WG of the CP: • Serving the DCIWG and OPDLWG • Sounds Good!. What did the OPDLWG think?? The Answer was NO!

  11. One More Thing… • The Commission also proposed another “specific” WG – The VCSG • The Voice Communications Working Group. • The DCIWG says that voice is…. • Just another data stream… • CWG/1 – Sept. 2015 • Voice is on the work programme???!! • Do we need a specific group to deal with this?

  12. Now ? Lets discuss….

More Related