1 / 11

Task 2.3 - particle simulations studies: progress report

Task 2.3 - particle simulations studies: progress report. M. Giovannozzi Objectives To study the field quality tolerances for new magnetic elements for the LHC upgrade To evaluate the dynamic aperture and tolerances of the correction circuit settings Partners

harsha
Télécharger la présentation

Task 2.3 - particle simulations studies: progress report

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Task 2.3 - particle simulations studies: progress report M. Giovannozzi Objectives To study the field quality tolerances for new magnetic elements for the LHC upgrade To evaluate the dynamic aperture and tolerances of the correction circuit settings Partners BINP, CEA, CERN, CSIC-IFIC, EPFL, INFN-Frascati, SLAC, Uni-Liv, Uni-Man WP2 TLM - 2.3 - MG

  2. Main achievements - I • Injection • Specification of the FQ for IT and matching section magnets. • Collision • IT field quality specified. • Specification of triplets’ correctors (well ahead of milestone). • Dynamic aperture vs. beta* • First look at impact of insertion magnets field quality. • First look at impact of non-linear stray fields. WP2 TLM - 2.3 - MG

  3. Main achievements - II • Other topics • Analysis of scaling laws for the evolution of the dynamic aperture with time. • Plans for the development of the SixTrackcode. • Analysis of possible numerical errors in tracking simulations and their impact on the dynamic aperture simulation results. • Alternative approaches to the simulation of the field quality of crab cavities. WP2 TLM - 2.3 - MG

  4. Injection studies Courtesy R. de Maria Now also a paper at IPAC13 Study of impact of b6 and b10 at injection based on ET’s estimate of links between the two components. Error tables at injection for D1/2, Q4/5 prepared by Stephan (based on measured FQ of existing magnets). Tracking performed by Riccardo. The error tables used are fine as far as tracking results are concerned. They will be presented at next joint WP2/3 meeting (to be held on 2 July 2012). WP2 TLM - 2.3 - MG

  5. Collision Studies - I Courtesy Y. Nosochkov • Optimisation of IT FQ • Starting point: WP3 estimated table (E. Todesco). • Scan over multipoles to determine maximum interval acceptable. • NB: in layout SLHCV3.01 the triplet correctors do not include a5, b5, a6. WP2 TLM - 2.3 - MG

  6. Collision Studies - II Triplets correctors WP2 TLM - 2.3 - MG

  7. Collision studies - III • Impact of beta* on dynamic aperture: • Linear below beta*=1 m • Constant otherwise • Same slope for two sets of IT FQ tables. • Offset of 1.5 sigma between the two sets of IT FQ tables. WP2 TLM - 2.3 - MG

  8. Collision studies - IV Courtesy Y. Nosochkov WP2 TLM - 2.3 - MG • Impact of field quality of other insertion magnets: • IT set to optimised FQ. • Introduced other magnets. • D1, D2, most relevant, Q4 much less (Q5 almost irrelevant).

  9. Next steps - I • Original plans • SLAC to work on SLHCV3.01 • Other teams to work on SLHCV3.1b • Comments: • Work on SLHCV3.1b has been done mainly by CERN team. • HLLHCV1.0 is available now (but all the tools need to be developed)! • Proposed scenario: • SLAC to continue working on SLHCV3.01 (some tools to be reviewed, though). • CERN team will apply SLAC results to SLHCV3.1b. • Once tools ready, other teams will start working on HLLHCV1.0, applying SLAC results to that lattice. WP2 TLM - 2.3 - MG

  10. Next steps - II • In parallel: • Activity on non-linear stray fields should continue (CEA and CERN teams). • Discussion with WP3 about error tables for all insertion magnets: • New tables for collision will be provided within days (E. Todesco). • Review of analysis tools for numerical simulations. WP2 TLM - 2.3 - MG

  11. References Y. Nosochkov, et al., “Optimization of Triplet Quadrupoles Field Quality for the LHC High Luminosity Lattice at Collision Energy”, TUPFI016, in IPAC13 proceedings. M. Giovannozzi, S. Fartoukh, R. De Maria, “Specification of a System of Correctors for the Triplets and Separation Dipoles of the LHC Upgrade”, WEPEA048, in IPAC13 proceedings. M. Giovannozzi, et al., “Dynamic Aperture Performance for Different Collision Optics Scenarios for the LHC Luminosity Upgrade”, WEPEA047, in IPAC13 proceedings. A. Bogomyagkov , et al., “Analysis of the Non-linear Fringe Effects of Large Aperture Triplets for the HL LHC Project”, WEPEA049, in IPAC13 proceedings. Y. Nosochkov, et al., “Evaluation of Field Quality for Separation Dipoles and Matching Section Quadrupoles for the LHC High Luminosity Lattice at Collision Energy”, TUPFI017, in IPAC13 proceedings. R. De Maria, S. Fartoukh, M. Giovannozzi, “Specifications of the Field Quality at Injection Energy of the New Magnets for the HL-LHC Upgrade Project”, WEPEA045, in IPAC13 proceedings. M. Giovannozzi, R. De Maria, F. Lang, “Analysis of Possible Functional Forms of the Scaling Law for Dynamic Aperture as a Function of Time”, WEPEA050, in IPAC13 proceedings. R. De Maria et al., “Recent Developments and Future Plans for SixTrack”, MOPWO02, in IPAC13 proceedings. R. De Maria, M. Giovannozzi, E. McIntosh, “Investigation of Numerical Precision Issues of Long Term Single Particle Tracking”, MOPWO026, in IPAC13 proceedings. D. R. Brett, et al., “Comparison of Taylor Maps with RF Multipoles in a Thin Lens 6D Tracking Code”, WEPEA076, in IPAC13 proceedings. WP2 TLM - 2.3 - MG

More Related