1 / 0

HB 555: A Few Highlights

HB 555: A Few Highlights. Information Provided By. Associate Superintendent James Herrholz , Associate Superintendent of the Ohio Department of Education. Slides by Herrholz and Sawyer Make-up by Oil of Olay Wardrobe by Kohl’s Powerpoint by Hoffmeyer Agenda by ESC Curriculum

hart
Télécharger la présentation

HB 555: A Few Highlights

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. HB 555: A Few Highlights
  2. Information Provided By Associate Superintendent James Herrholz, Associate Superintendent of the Ohio Department of Education Slides by Herrholz and Sawyer Make-up by Oil of Olay Wardrobe by Kohl’s Powerpoint by Hoffmeyer Agenda by ESC Curriculum Extras by Stark County and Beyond Curriculum Directors
  3. HB 555 Highlights
  4. What? How? Resident Educator, Highly Qualified Teachers, other PD Ohio New Learning Standards OTES and OPES How Well?
  5. Other HB 555 Provisions
  6. Other HB 555 Provisions By August 31, 2013, the State Board must submit to General Assembly recommendations for a comprehensive statewide plan to intervene directly in and improve the performance of persistently poor performing schools and school districts.
  7. Other HB 555 Provisions
  8. OTESBarbara Barthel
  9. Ohio Teacher Evaluation System Model: Teacher Performance
  10. HB 555 – Teacher Evaluation Changes how the value-added progress dimension is used to evaluate teachers
  11. Teacher Evaluations
  12. Teacher Evaluations
  13. Teacher Evaluations Clarification is added that instructors of adult education are not subject to teacher and principal evaluations
  14. Teacher Evaluations

  15. Crosswalk between OTES, Common Core and PARCC

  16. Provides teachers and students feedback on their performance.
  17. Recognizes and rewards effective teachers.
  18. Identifies practical ways to improve student learning.
  19. STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVESGail Martino and Barbara Barthel
  20. The Perfect Analogy Student Learning Objectives/Student Growth Measures =
  21. HB 555 Changes Category A
  22. OTES Provides for Multiple Evaluation Factors
  23. Category A is now divided into A1 and A2
  24. LEA Determined Measures Student Learning Objective (SLO) framework Types of Assessments District-approved, locally developed assessments Pre/Post assessments Performance-Based Portfolios
  25. LEA Determined Measures Shared Attribution Vendor Assessments? Regional exemplars
  26. Reinforce Best Teaching Practice Through Setting goals for students Using data to assess student progress Adjusting instruction based upon progress
  27. Potential For Collaboration
  28. Do all Teachers Need to Write SLOs? ODE recommends that all teachers create at least one SLO this year to gain experience with the SLO process. In subsequent years, teachers should create two to four SLOs per year. Category A1 will not have the option to use local measures beginning July 2014.
  29. SLO Approval SLOs are approved at the local level. ODE recommends an existing committee. Provide feedback: both cool & warm. Recommend allowing 10 days for revisions.
  30. Selecting Assessments for SLOs ODE strongly recommends LEAs not allow assessments created by one teacher for use in his/her classroom.

  31. Support

    Regional Student Growth Measure Specialists: Chad Rice SE Region chad.rice@mvesc.org Carolyn Everidge-Frey, Assistant Director Office of Educator Equity and Talent 614-644-7446 Carolyn.Everidge-Frey@education.ohio.gov SGM@education.ohio.gov Mark Robinson NE Region m.robinson@mahoningesc.org Donna Huber Central huber.donna@moesc.net Apryl Ealy NW Region aealy@auglaizeesc.org Katrina Wagoner SW Region katrina.wagoner@hcesc.org
  32. Value-Added EVAAS System Phased-in implementation Math and reading, 4-8 Science, 5 & 8
  33. What do we know? 3 types of measures 3 categories of teachers LEA discretion and flexibility
  34. Value-Added Roster Verification process (Linkage) Multi-year composite Multiple measures? New assessments?
  35. VALUE-ADDEDElaine Barkan
  36. Value-Added EVAAS System Phased-in implementation Math and reading, 4-8 Science, 5 & 8
  37. Value-Added Roster Verification process (Linkage) Multi-year composite Multiple measures New assessments
  38. Roster Verification Teacher participation Principal sign-off 40% are new to process
  39. Timeline April 8 –23– Schools receive raw student rosters produced by EMIS; April 8–12 and April 15–19 – e Roster Verification trainings; April 24 –May 14 –Teacher Roster Verification period; May 15 – June 5 – Principal Roster-Verification review and approval.
  40. Value-Added: Resources BFK resources VALs and DVALs Online courses Webinars Trainings
  41. Value-Added: Extended BFK pilots Terra Nova ACT End-of Course Race to the Top grants NWEA MAP, STAR
  42. Overall Value Added and Value Added Subgroups
  43. Progress Component
  44. Progress Component
  45. THIRD GRADE READING GUARANTEEBarbara Barthel
  46. HB 555 – Changes to Third Grade Reading Guarantee More options to demonstrate ability to provide reading instruction
  47. HB 555 – Changes to Third Grade Reading Guarantee
  48. Educator Qualifications Any teacher with a student retained by the Third Grade Reading Guarantee or on a reading improvement and monitoring plan must have been actively engaged in the reading instruction of students for the previous three years, and meet required criteria.

  49. Educator Credentials

    For the 2013-2014 school year: Reading endorsement on the teacher’s license and a passing score on the corresponding assessment Amaster’s degree program with a major in reading Rated “above value added,” in reading as defined by ODE, for the last two years Demonstrated evidence of a credential earned from an ODE-approved list of research-based reading instruction programs
  50. Educator Credentials
  51. For the 2014-2015 school year and thereafter:

    Educator Credentials

  52. REPORT CARDMike Bayer

  53. New Report Card MeasuresBased on Letter Grades
  54. Report Card Measures Measures Grouped into 6 Components Component Grades Calculated for 2012-13 & 2013-14 Component grades and overall grade Calculated for 2014-15
  55. Report Card Components
  56. Gap Closing Component AMO – Replaces Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
  57. Achievement Component
  58. Performance Index
  59. Performance Indicators Raises Proficiency Benchmark from 75% to 80% for August 2014 report card (except 11th grade OGT) Gifted Performance Indicator for August 2015 report card
  60. Benchmarks for Performance Indicators Met and Performance Index – ‘A’ Rating
  61. Graduation Rate Component
  62. Progress Component
  63. K-3 Literacy Component
  64. Prepared for Success Component
  65. Prepared for Success Component Measures College Admission Test: Percent taken Percent remediation free Dual Enrollment Credit Number of students earning three college credits Industry Credentials Percent of students receiving
  66. Prepared for Success Component Measures Honors Diploma Percentage who receive Advanced Placement (AP) Percentage participating Percentage with score of 3 or above International Baccalaureate (IB) Percentage participating Percentage with a score of 4 or better
  67. Prepared for Success Component Measures College and career-ready assessment Results of this assessment provided for district and/or building Will either begin on the August 2014 or 2015 report card, depending on the budget May be part of Prepared for Success Component grade
  68. Report Card Graphic Organizer(See Handout) This is not a prototype for a new report card. Based on the provisions in HB555 Provided by Jim Herrholtz, ODE Assoc. Superintendent

  69. SOCIAL MEDIADana Weber

  70. Outreach and Communication Outreach Communication Webpage: http://www.ode.state.oh.us/GD/Templates/Pages/ODE/ODEDetail.aspx?page=3&TopicRelationID=5&ContentID=129423 E-mail: thirdgradeguarantee@education.ohio.gov Communication blasts: EdConnection IDES Tools for Teachers Webinar/Webcast Conference presentations Guidance documents State-Developed Diagnostic Assessments 2012-13 District diagnostic survey Website resources for: Districts Educators Parents Third Grade Reading Guarantee Advisory Workgroup
  71. ODE Website Updates
  72. New Video: Third Grade Reading Guarantee education.ohio.gov http://www.ode.state.oh.us/GD/Templates/Pages/ODE/ODEDetail.aspx?page=3&TopicRelationID=5&ContentID=137608&Content=137608
  73. Technology Specifications and Sample Test Items parcconline.org/technology
  74. Technology Readiness Tool Send email to: OhioTRT@education.ohio.govor call 614-994-4146
  75. Ohio My Voice Initiative myvoice.pearsonfoundation.org/ohio
  76. For More Information education.ohio.gov
  77. Connect with ODE ohio-department-of-education OhioEdDept Ohio Teachers’ Homeroom
More Related