harvey
Uploaded by
10 SLIDES
189 VUES
100LIKES

Streamlining Procedures for Registration and Issuance in Project Cycle Assessment

DESCRIPTION

Suggestions for improving registration and issuance procedures, including reducing timelines, clarifying review processes, and enhancing transparency.

1 / 10

Télécharger la présentation

Streamlining Procedures for Registration and Issuance in Project Cycle Assessment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Module 4.1 Project CycleAssessment of new procedures for registration and issuance. Suggestions for improvement Susanne.Haefeli-Hestvik@Tricorona.se

  2. Form • Link to accreditation: Good but judge DOEs on ”real” issues i.e. better quality control please • Timelines: Above 15 days and workload is increasing • Timelines of adjacent processes are high: approval of requests for deviation, monitoring plan change and design change notifications (let alone new methodology submissions) • Scheduled reviews are re-scheduled Source: Workshop PDF-DIA February 2011 and further discussions with some DOEs and PPs

  3. Form: My Wishlist  • Schedule assessment of answers to reviews from the start • Reduce time to answer reviews by DOEs/PPs to 2 weeks • Publish arguments made by the Secretariat and RIT • Reduce the RIT and Sec assessment from 2 to 1 week and the EB’s timeline to object from 3 to 1. • Chance for 30 minutes conference call with DOE within 48 hours both ways to clarify issues • Possibility to fix things quickly while still preserving the mechanism’s environmental integrity and transparency. • Consolidation of deviation, design change and monitoring plan change procedures into request for issuance procedure.

  4. Form: My Wishlist  • Schedule assessment of answers to reviews from the start • Reduce time to answer reviews by DOEs/PPs to 2 weeks • Publish arguments made by the Secretariat and RIT • Reduce the RIT and Sec assessment from 2 to 1 week and the EB’s timeline to object from 3 to 1. • Chance for 30 minutes conference call with DOE within 48 hours both ways to clarify issues • Possibility to fix things quickly while still preserving the mechanism’s environmental integrity and transparency. • Consolidation of deviation, design change and monitoring plan change procedures into request for issuance procedure. Possible? • Attention: Wild thinking!! • Have publication and CC/IRC in parallel? • Could we eventually move to registration date freely choseable?

  5. Content • Better quality control: stay within the rules/criteria • Allow for common sense and drop non-significant issues • 467.79 instead of 467.81 MW: 0.004%! • Generation has been 15% higher last year than the previous 3 years. • Excel file: explain the calculation of some values • My point is: • The DOE explained it was a typo  example of blindly insisting on procedures • Generation has been much higher only for one year, not PERMANENT example of need for better quality control • Excel file example of scope for a quick call with the DOE. •  Link to accreditation: This review should not count towards the DOE’s performance assessment

  6. Discussion openers: • Schedule assessment of answers to reviews from the start • Reduce time to answer reviews by DOEs/PPs to 2 weeks • Publish arguments made by the Secretariat and RIT • Reduce the RIT and Sec assessment from 2 to 1 week and the EB’s timeline to object from 3 to 1. • Chance for 30 minutes conference call with DOE within 48 hours both ways to clarify issues • Possibility to fix things quickly while still preserving the mechanism’s environmental integrity and transparency. • Consolidation of deviation, design change and monitoring plan change procedures into request for issuance procedure. • Attention: Wild thinking!! • Have publication and CC/IRC in parallel? • Could we eventually move to registration date freely choseable? • Plus: workshop on step 2 of additionality tool and digitization

More Related