SlideServe
Menu
Préférences
© SlideServe · v2026

Geographical Distances and Family Support Dynamics in Modern Society

harvey avatar
12 diapositives · 226 Views · Sep 16, 2014

Explore how distances to family members impact support dynamics in individualized societies with diminishing welfare states. Analyze data from the Netherlands Kinship Panel Study to understand the role of proximity in household support.

Geographical Distances and Family Support Dynamics in Modern Society - slide 1
01 / 12Geographical Distances and Family Support Dynamics in Modern Society
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Geographical Distances and Family Support Dynamics in Modern Society
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation
  1. Geographical distances and support from family members Clara H. Mulder and Marieke van der Meer

  2. The issue Family support in individualising societies with less generous welfare states Distances to family members might grow (globalising labour market?)

  3. Questions To what extent does geographical distance to parents, siblings and children living outside the household influence the receipt of support from them? To what extent does the availability of other family members living closer play a part in this receipt of support?

  4. Definition of support Helping repeatedly (in last 3 months) with household chores (shopping, cooking, cleaning)

  5. Hypotheses Distance: • Greater distance, less support • Less distance decay for closest kin (mothers, children)

  6. Hypotheses Alternative caregivers: • Living closest, more support • (Closer) kin nearby, less support

  7. Data Netherlands Kinship Panel Study (NKPS), wave 1: Main sample (N = 8161) Units of analysis: dyads of potential recipient and potential caregiver (only those not in the same household)

  8. Data • Fathers: 2937 dyads • Mothers: 4159 dyads • Children: 4172 dyads • Siblings: 9691 dyads

  9. Method • Separate logistic regressions of receiving support from father, mother, children, siblings. Controls included • Children, siblings: standard errors adjusted for clustering in families • To be done: simultaneous models for father and mother

  10. Results (1)

  11. Results (2)

  12. Conclusions • Distance important, but less so for mothers and children • Living closest important for mothers, siblings • Some substitution between family members, particularly between parents and siblings