1 / 52

Strategies for Increasing Healthcare Access

Strategies for Increasing Healthcare Access. Flávio Casoy (adapted from Kao-Ping Chua and Vanessa Calderón) Jack Rutledge Fellow American Medical Student Association. It takes more than medical school to make a physician!.

hedia
Télécharger la présentation

Strategies for Increasing Healthcare Access

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Strategies for Increasing Healthcare Access Flávio Casoy(adapted from Kao-Ping Chua and Vanessa Calderón)Jack Rutledge FellowAmerican Medical Student Association

  2. It takes more than medical school to make a physician!

  3. AMSA - the nation’s OLDEST and LARGEST independent health professional student association • Entirely Student Led. • Over 68,000 members. • Over a million community service hours each year. • For 58 years, a progressive voice in American medicine. • Unites the voices of physicians-in-training to fight for a healthcare and medical education system that reflect OUR values!!

  4. International perspective Total Spending on Health Care, 2005 Source: OECD Health Data 2007

  5. International perspective Health Care Spending per Capita, 2005 Source: OECD Health Data 2007

  6. Health status and outcomes Life Expectancy at Birth, 2004-5 Source: OECD Health Data 2007

  7. Health status and outcomes Infant Mortality, 2004-5 Source: OECD Health Data 2007

  8. Outline • Insurance Coverage in the U.S. Health Care System • Strategies for Increasing Health Care Access: Pros and Cons

  9. Insurance Coverage in the US Health Care System

  10. Health insurance coverage of non-elderly population

  11. Profile of the uninsured • 47.0 million Americans • 81% from working families • 52-59% from low-income families (200% FPL) • 80% are adults • 50% are ethnic minorities • 79% are American citizens Source: Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured Source: US Census Bureau

  12. Health insurance coverage of non-elderly population

  13. Employer-sponsored insurance • Offered by employers as part of benefits package • Administered by private insurance companies (for-profit and non-profit) • Employer pays bulk of premium; employee pays remainder • Significant erosion of employer-sponsored insurance in recent years

  14. Health insurance coverage of non-elderly population

  15. Individual insurance • Purchased directly by people who do not get coverage through their employers • Non-group (individual) plans • Premiums based on individual health risk • High-risk individuals with limited access • High Deductibles • Administratively expensive

  16. Health insurance coverage of non-elderly population

  17. Medicare • Covers elderly (ages 65 and older) and non-elderly with disabilities • Administered by the federal government (essentially a single-payer system) • Financed through: • Federal income taxes • Payroll taxes • Out-of-pocket payments by enrollees

  18. Medicare • Four parts: • Part A – hospital insurance • Part B – supplemental insurance • Part C – managed care • Part D – prescription drugs • Significant coverage gaps - most enrollees obtain supplemental insurance • Spending growth generally slower than private insurance • Aging population and increased technology presents challenges for the future

  19. Medicaid • Covers certain low-income individuals; not every poor person is covered! • Administered by state governments • Often out-sourced to non-government administrators • Financed jointly by the state and federal governments • Benefits are fairly comprehensive, but many providers won’t take care of Medicaid patients

  20. Minimum Medicaid Eligibility Levels, 2004 Income eligibility levels as a percent of the Federal Poverty Level: Note: The federal poverty level was $10,488 for a single person and $16,079 for a family of three in 2006. SOURCE: Cohen Ross and Cox, 2004 and KCMU, Medicaid Resource Book, 2002.

  21. State Children’s Health Insurance Program (S-CHIP) • Supplements Medicaid by covering low-income children who are ineligible for Medicaid • Administered and financed similarly to Medicaid • Similar problems to Medicaid: • Low reimbursement rates → some providers refuse to accept S-CHIP • Under-enrollment • Eligibility varies by specific populations and states

  22. Strategies for Increasing Healthcare Access

  23. Public Program Expansions: Medicaid, CHIP, Medicare Do nothing; market will fix itself National Health Insurance* Tax credits Individual Mandates Employer Mandates Individual Commodity Public Good U.S. system *Health care system adopted by every other industrialized democracy

  24. Tax credits • AMA plan - offer tax credits to people to purchase health insurance. • Tax credits would be: • Inversely related to income • Contingent upon purchase of health insurance • Refundable • Advanceable • Financed by repeal of tax subsidy

  25. Tax credits - pros • Makes health insurance available to more people • Keeps current system in place • Tax infrastructure already in place • May increase choice of insurance plans

  26. Tax credits - cons • Not universal • Builds on individual market (inefficient and discriminatory) • Problems of current system would remain • Employers tempted to drop coverage • No cost controls • No guarantee that competition will help • Does not take co-pays and deductibles into consideration

  27. Public Program Expansions: Medicaid, CHIP, Medicare Do nothing; market will fix itself National Health Insurance* Tax credits Individual Mandates Employer Mandates Individual Commodity Public Good U.S. system *Health care system adopted by every other industrialized democracy

  28. Individual mandates • Force everyone to have health insurance through some mechanism: • Employer-based • Medicaid • Individual market • People would pay a penalty for not having health insurance

  29. Individual mandates - pros • Achieves close to universal coverage • Easily understood • Leaves current system in place • Appeals to “anti-freeriding” ethic

  30. Individual mandates - cons • High cost of purchasing health insurance • Disproportionately burdensome to low-income individuals • Builds on inefficient individual market • No cost controls • Difficulty and cost of enforcing mandate • Deductibles, co-pays

  31. Individual mandates - cons • Massachusetts – Individual Mandate • Single, male, 26 year-old, earning 301% FPL - $2,631 per month, in Framingham, MA • Premium: $150/month • Drugs: $30/generics, 50% for brand names • Co-pay $25 per doctor visit, $100 per ED • Procedure, Study, or Hosp stay: $2000 Deductible + 20% co-insurance • $5000 max out of pocket (not counting drugs or visits to doctors or EDs)

  32. Public Program Expansions: Medicaid, CHIP, Medicare Do nothing; market will fix itself National Health Insurance* Tax credits Individual Mandates Employer Mandates Individual Commodity Public Good U.S. system *Health care system adopted by every other industrialized democracy

  33. Employer mandates • Variation #1: Employers forced to provide health benefits to employees • Variation #2: Play-or-pay – employers provide health benefits that meets certain standards or submit to payroll tax to fund public coverage for employees

  34. Employer mandates • Low-wage employers temporarily subsidized • Expansion of Medicaid for unemployed or others who don’t get health insurance through their employer

  35. Employer mandates - pros • Achieves close to universal coverage • Builds on current system • Levels the playing field for employers • People like getting health insurance from their employer (mostly) • Most of new cost is hidden from employees

  36. Employer mandates - cons • Opposition from many businesses • Disproportionately burdensome for small businesses • Implicit tax on employees (lower wages) • Potential layoffs of low-wage jobs • Inhibits creation of new jobs • No cost controls • Disadvantages of employer-based system (non-portability, economic strain on businesses)

  37. Public Program Expansions: Medicaid, CHIP, Medicare Do nothing; market will fix itself National Health Insurance* Tax credits Individual Mandates Employer Mandates Individual Commodity Public Good U.S. system *Health care system adopted by every other industrialized democracy

  38. Public program expansion • Expand eligibility of Medicaid, S-CHIP, and other public programs to more people • Examples: • Expansion by income – cover everyone under 200% of poverty level • Expansion by demographic – cover childless adults

  39. Public program expansion - pros • May lead to universal coverage eventually (pincer strategy) • Infrastructure largely in place already • Leaves current system in place • Potential political support to expand access to some groups (esp. children)

  40. Public program expansion - cons • Not necessarily universal coverage • Anti-welfare sentiment • Lack of a political voice of potential beneficiaries • Access problems with Medicaid/S-CHIP • May be seen as unjust • May “take the wind out of the sails” of more comprehensive reforms

  41. Public Program Expansions: Medicaid, CHIP, Medicare Do nothing; market will fix itself National Health Insurance* Tax credits Individual Mandates Employer Mandates Individual Commodity Public Good U.S. system *Health care system adopted by every other industrialized democracy

  42. National health insurance • NHI = having a health insurance plan that is available to everyone • Does not specify financing (single payer vs. multi payer) • Does not specify whether DELIVERY of health care is public or private

  43. Countries with NHI …(South Africa) Industrialized countries without NHI? only one …

  44. Example of NHI: Single payer • Government becomes main reimburser of health care providers • Universal coverage for defined services • Automatic enrollment • Private insurance for “supplemental” benefits • Financed by taxes, offset by less premiums • Delivery remains mostly private

  45. Single payer - pros • Universal coverage • Greatly reduced administrative costs • Coverage is portable (not tied to employment) • Free choice of doctors and hospitals • Very little uncompensated care • Greater potential to control costs • More rational and efficient allocation of resources and technology

  46. Single payer - cons • No choice in insurance plans • Potential for underfunding by hostile government or recession • Potential for mismanagement • Politically more difficult • Special interests • Transition period • Resistance to taxes

  47. Public Program Expansions: Medicaid, CHIP, Medicare Do nothing; market will fix itself National Health Insurance* Tax credits Individual Mandates Employer Mandates Individual Commodity Public Good U.S. system *Health care system adopted by every other industrialized democracy

  48. Conclusion: How do you evaluate a solution? • Every solution has disadvantages, no matter what. Based on your values, you can select which disadvantages are outweighed by the advantages. • If you value a profit-driven industry that sees healthcare as a commodity, tax credits may be appealing. • If you value universality and comprehensiveness, NHI may be appealing.

  49. What does AMSA support? • For the last 15 or so years, AMSA has supported a public, single, national health insurance system to ensure that everyone has access to affordable, quality heatlhcare. • Actively fight for sCHIP, Medicare, Medicaid, Community Health Centers, Title VII, and much more….

  50. More Ways To Get Involved: • JOIN MEDICAL STUDENTS JUST LIKE YOU – JOIN AMSA! www.amsa.org • Attend Your Regional Conference: • 1,2,3: Nov 9th – Nov 11th ~ Portland, ME

More Related