1 / 7

Intersectional approaches to Science

Intersectional approaches to Science. & Banu Subramaium’s “Snow Brown and the Seven Detergents: A Metanarrative on Science and the Scientific Method. i ntersectionality development. D eveloped by Kimberle Crenshaw, 1989

heman
Télécharger la présentation

Intersectional approaches to Science

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Intersectional approaches to Science & Banu Subramaium’s “Snow Brown and the Seven Detergents: A Metanarrative on Science and the Scientific Method

  2. intersectionality development • Developed by Kimberle Crenshaw, 1989 • Combahee River Collective: “simultaneity” & “interlocking oppressions” (1977) • Later expanded upon by Patricia Hill Collins: “matrix of domination” • A hallmark theory of WoCfeminisms

  3. intersectionality definition • Various axes of identity—race, class, gender, nationality, sexuality, ability (etc.)—interact simultaneously in shaping a person’s relationship to power • These axes are inseparable; mutually reinforcing • Thus, according to one’s social locations, privilege and oppression will be experienced in various ways, to varying degrees, according to circumstance

  4. intersectionality …why? • Reaction to second wave feminism, which privileged gender/sex discrimination: • Rhetoric of sisterhood • Leadership & goals of the movement…who benefitted? • More accurate & contextualized description of experiences of oppression: • Sometimes race (etc.) may predominate • Didn’t seek to alienate men

  5. intersectionality consequences • Meaningful critique of “feminism-as-usual” • Far more complex understanding of feminism, its constituents, & goals • Far more inclusive—and therefore successful—movement

  6. Written discussion questions: • What are the differences between Subramanium’s three endings? • Which ending(s) do you think best reflects the state of science education and practice in the U.S. today…and why?

  7. Written discussion questions: • If appreciation for how intersecting identities and positionalities can influence scientific education and research was the norm, what outcome(s) would you anticipate for science as a whole? (Positive and/or negative)

More Related