1 / 1

Planning with Map and State Uncertainty Dave Ferguson and Juan Pablo Gonzalez

b o. b i. a o. a i. c i. c o. d o. d i. R. R. a o. b o. c o. d o. a o. b o. c o. d o. 5+20. 15+20. 20+20. ½. ½. Heuristic cost from a to Goal. Cost to a. ∞. R. R. a o. b o. c o. d o. a o. b o. c o. d o. 5+20. 15+20. 20+20.

Télécharger la présentation

Planning with Map and State Uncertainty Dave Ferguson and Juan Pablo Gonzalez

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. bo bi ao ai ci co do di R R ao bo co do ao bo co do 5+20 15+20 20+20 ½ ½ Heuristic cost froma to Goal Cost to a ∞ R R ao bo co do ao bo co do 5+20 15+20 20+20 Planning with Map and State Uncertainty Dave Ferguson and Juan Pablo Gonzalez Planning with Map Uncertainty Reducing the State Space: Partially-Known Environments We can restrict our attention to areas whose uncertainty is crucial to the planning task: Our agents often have to plan in domains for which prior information is imperfect: • Environments with hidden state • Partially-known environments • Unknown or dynamic environments Environments with Hidden State Hidden State – areas of the environment whose value (terrain cost, traversability, etc) is initially unknown to the agent. Indoor example: DOORWAYS! Solving the Planning Task: PAO* • Focus computation on promising states • Propagate information across state space 1. 2. 5+20 10+10 15+20 20+20 • If door bisclosed, there is no path to the goal Benefits of Our Approach: • Uncertainty incorporated into the planning task • Computation focussed on the most relevant areas of the environment and state space 3. 4. b 15+ (15 + ∞/2) 10 + (5 + ∞/2) 5 + (15 + ∞/2) 10 + (5 + ∞/2) 20 + (15 + ∞/2) a Robust paths are generated in a highly efficient manner. c d Planning without Considering Uncertainty • Path appears to have low cost • But: • Expected cost is high • Worst case cost is very high Planning Considering Uncertainty • Lower expected cost • Lower worst case cost • Safer path • Less dependency on sensors to detect mobility threats • Ability to detect high risk areas Planning with Position Uncertainty Goals: • Plan safe paths in presence of position uncertainty • Reduce dependency on sensors to ensure safety • Evaluate risk along path based on uncertainty model Uncertainty Model • Robot position modeled as Gaussian centered at the most likely location • Error propagated as dead reckoning error • Cell cost calculated as expected value of cost given position and uncertainty Future and Ongoing work • Model and plan with GPS error • Recommend safe speeds based on likelihood of risk Main Contribution: d q1, s1 q0, s0 Ability to plan paths that consider position error and minimize expected risk

More Related