1 / 10

Science Case Working Group

Science Case Working Group. Section 3: Inflation & Fundamental Physics Section 4: Gravity Waves from Inflation and the B-mode Polarization Contributors: P.Ferreira, S.Leach, A.Melchiorri, K.Land, L.Popa, M.Bucher, F.Finelli, S.Matarrese …. Inflation.

henry
Télécharger la présentation

Science Case Working Group

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Science Case Working Group Section 3:Inflation & Fundamental Physics Section 4:Gravity Waves from Inflation and the B-mode Polarization Contributors: P.Ferreira, S.Leach, A.Melchiorri, K.Land, L.Popa, M.Bucher, F.Finelli, S.Matarrese …

  2. Inflation • Model defined by V(Φ) or V(Φ,Ψ,…) • Scalar and tensor perturbations

  3. Tegmark et al. Inflation Classes of models • Large field (chaotic) (Φ/μ)p, exp(Φ/μ) • Small field (1 - (Φ/μ)p) • Hybrid (2+ fields) (1+ (Φ/μ)p)

  4. Fundamental Physics Want to know the physics behind inflation • The New Cosmology (Strings/M-theory/Branes) making predictions (scalar fields, potential between branes,…) • Alternatives exist (pre-big bang, cyclic, ekpyrotic, …) We want to do more than constrain V How reliable are these predictions?

  5. Inflation - what we know so far Crude constraints on dynamics of inflation • WMAP3 consistent with adiabatic, Gaussian fluctuations • Tensor mode has not been detected • There could be some other contributions (cosmic strings, isocurvature, …) • ns≈ 0.96 ( < 1 at 95% CI) • Exclude quartic potentials, disfavour Hybrid • r ≤ 0.38

  6. Inflation - what we could know Amplitude of tensor mode fixes energy scale of inflation V1/4 = 3.3 x 1016 r1/4 GeV (current constraint V1/4 < 2.6 x 1016 GeV) Detection of tensor modes would: • Confirm that inflation took place • Determine energy scale • Constrain dynamics

  7. Lucia Popa Sensitivity Planck: r > 0.1 Should detect the lensed E modes (l>150) Clover/Quiet: r > 0.01 (1016 GeV) Can detect/rule out Large-field models. Bpol: r > 0.001

  8. Predictions • Large-fieldr > 0.01 High-field values  probing new territory beyond Planck scale. • Otherr could be 10-10 No guarantee of r detectable If Clover/Quiet find r<0.01, do we expect Bpol to do better?

  9. Bpol after Clover/QUIET • Models with 0.001 < r < 0.01  6 x 1015 < V1/4 < 1016 GeV • Fine tuning arguments  r > 0.01 ? • Impact of a null detection? r < 0.001 What does this tell us about fundamental physics? Inflation < GUT scale, impact on model building…

  10. Discussion Section 3: Inflation and Fundamental Physics Section 4: Gravity Waves, Polarization & Inflation • Overall tone & aim • How many branes? • Party line on expectation of r • Level of detail • Notation, etc.

More Related