1 / 13

The Role of PBMs in Pharmacy Payment Cycles: Lower Costs and Prevent Fraud

This article discusses the 30-Day Pharmacy Payment Cycle and its benefits in terms of consumer access, cost savings, and fraud prevention. It explains how PBMs contract with pharmacies and the importance of efficient payment cycles. It also highlights the standard 30-day payment cycle in Medicare and private-sector programs and the role of PBMs in meeting this standard. The article further emphasizes the need for 30-day payments to process claims and prevent fraud. It concludes by addressing the potential challenges and costs associated with accelerated payment cycles and the real challenge for independent pharmacies in terms of lower-priced competition.

herbertm
Télécharger la présentation

The Role of PBMs in Pharmacy Payment Cycles: Lower Costs and Prevent Fraud

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Why 30-Day Pharmacy Payment Cycles Lower Costs and Prevent Fraud

  2. The Role of PBMs in Pharmacy Payment Cycles: Consumer Access, Cost Savings, and Fraud Prevention • Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs) contract with more than 90 percent of pharmacies throughout the United States to give consumers convenient access to their prescription drug benefits • PBM–pharmacy contracts typically allow pharmacies to collect and keep consumer copayments and give plan sponsors 30 days to reimburse pharmacies for remaining costs through their PBMs • 30-day pharmacy payment cycles allow PBMs to efficiently batch and process millions of prescription claims from tens of thousands of pharmacies • Government intervention to accelerate pharmacy payment cycles would increase prescription drug costs for consumers and payors • Accelerated payment cycles would make it more difficult to detect and prevent pharmacy fraud

  3. 30-Days: The Medicare and Private-Sector Standard • 30-day pharmacy payment cycle is standard for: • Medicare Parts A & B • Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP) • State employee health programs • Nearly all private-sector health plans • 30-day payments have been the standard for decades • PBM industry has publicly pledged to abide by 30-day payment standard for Medicare Part D

  4. PBMs: Meeting the 30-day Standard

  5. 30-Day Payment Cycles Necessary to Process Millions of Claims for Thousands of Pharmacies Through Multiple Entities

  6. Independent Pharmacy Claims Payment Requires Numerous Steps in 30 Days 1. Days 1-14 2. Days 15-18 3. Days 16-22 4. Days 23-25 5. Days 25-?

  7. “Prompt Pay” Mandate Doubles Administrative Complexity

  8. Accelerated Pharmacy Payment Cycles Undermine Fraud Detection • Typical Examples of Pharmacy Fraud • Shorting number of pills • Substituting generic for brand • Early refills • Pharmacist offering to buy back prescription drugs • How PBMs Detect and Prevent Pharmacy Fraud • Verify information submitted by pharmacies • Investigate suspect claim patterns from specific pharmacies • Audit paper prescriptions and pharmacy purchases • According to the Coalition Against Insurance Fraud, “prompt pay” laws in California leave insurers little time to investigate suspicious claims

  9. Fraud and Abuse Detection Is A Necessary Step Just one pharmacy: • Submitted $11 million in false claims • Fraudulent prescriptions • Not requested by the patients • Not prescribed by the physician • Not dispensed by the pharmacy • Insurance companies paid $5 million of the false claims before the fraud was identified • Pharmacist Arrested in Fraudulent-Billing Case • The owner of a pharmacy was arrested Friday on federal charges of fraudulently billing private insurance companies for more than $11 million worth of medications that were never prescribed nor dispensed… • February 15, 2003

  10. Pharmacy Fraud Increases Medicaid Costs • In 2006, the New York Attorney General uncovered a Medicaid pharmacy fraud ring in which physicians, patients and pharmacies collaborated to defraud the state of more than $22 million • In 2006, the Texas grand jury indicted a pharmacy owner for felony offenses involving more than $5 million in alleged fraudulent Medicaid reimbursements for excessive prescription refills • A 2007 report by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and The U.S. Department of Justice found numerous examples of pharmacy fraud, including a New York pharmacist who pled guilty to submitting $1.875 million in fraudulent claims to Medicaid and private health insurers

  11. Medicare “Prompt Pay” Mandates Would Raise Costs According to a 2008 Study by PricewaterhouseCoopers: • A 14-day “prompt pay” requirement in Part D would increase costs to the Medicare program and its beneficiaries by $3.3 to $7.8 billion over 2009-2018 period • Cost to beneficiaries alone would increase by $1.3 to $3.1 billion over the 2009-2018 period if Part D mandated a 14-day pharmacy payment requirement

  12. Lower-Priced Competition—NOT Payment Cycles—the Real Challenge for Independent Pharmacies

  13. Conclusion: No Need to Change 30-Day Payments • Pharmacies are being paid on time with great efficiency • “Prompt pay” mandate would increase costs to Medicare and its beneficiaries by $3.3 to $7.8 billion over 10 years • Accelerated payments would make it more difficult to prevent fraud • Doctors and hospitals would also demand faster payments in Medicare A and B • Lower-priced competition—not payment cycles— is the real challenge for independents

More Related