1 / 33

Risk and uncertainty: a range of approaches

When building risk models, we can acknowledge uncertainty at different levels: . Specific future eventsQuantities/parameters in a model Assumptions underlying the best' model (both internal and external)Inadequacies of our best' model. . . But what about unacknowledged uncertainties?. . Cl

hertz
Télécharger la présentation

Risk and uncertainty: a range of approaches

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


    1. Risk and uncertainty: a range of approaches David Spiegelhalter winton professor of the public understanding of risk, university of cambridge SAPPUR, Bristol 2009 With thanks to Mike Pearson, Ian Short , Hauke Riesch, Owen Smith, Arciris Garay, etc etc

    2. When building risk models, we can acknowledge uncertainty at different levels: Specific future events Quantities/parameters in a model Assumptions underlying the best model (both internal and external) Inadequacies of our best model

    3. But what about unacknowledged uncertainties?

    4. Classify into uncertainty about : Specific future events

    6. Text? Numbers? Graphics? Animations? We may be concerned with what people like understand / can reproduce are influenced by But These are not necessarily the same formats! Formats are influential (framing) People vary hugely in their preferences and understanding

    7. Benefits of Tamiflu

    9. Classify into uncertainty about: Specific future events Quantities in a model Missing data Fixed or random effects Parameters (including systematic biases)

    10. UKPDS risk engine

    11. Problems with confidence limits Suggestion that all points in interval are equally likely Media can report up to X people might have Hepatitis C

    13. Express as a probability distribution, such as Bank of England fan charts for GDP

    14. Bank of England fan charts

    15. Hepatitis C prevalence in UK

    16. Classify into uncertainty about : Specific future events Quantities in a model Assumptions underlying the best model (both internal and external) Which model selection criterion: AIC, BIC, DIC etc etc? Can we put weights on models? Does it make sense to talk of probabilities of models?

    17. IPCC projections

    18. Some epistemic uncertainties about swine flu Infectiousness (R0) Severity (case fatality ratio) Risk of recombination with other flu viruses Pattern of re-emergence etc

    19. Government response? Standard approach in face of major epistemic uncertainties Play it safe Worst case planning scenarios 65,000 deaths now down to 19,000 (3rd Sept) Based on 30% clinical cases, 1/1000 die

    20. NICE Complex cost-effectiveness models used to help decide which treatments NHS should fund Only interested in mean response Prior distributions to express parameter uncertainty Alternative competing models Informal acknowledgement of model inadequacy

    21. Classify into uncertainty about : Specific future events Quantities in a model The structure of the best model (Recognised) inadequacies of our best model Its only a guide-book, not the truth! Doubt about many assumptions But can we quantify these limitations?

    22. extra-model uncertainties So far examined 4 levels of (potentially) quantifiable intra-model uncertainties What about unquantifiable extra-model sources? unknown unknowns: possibilities that have not been thought of unrecognised major scientific error unacknowledged cultural assumptions ambiguities in meaning unrecognised implicit value judgements as to what is important indeterminacy human element beyond modelling (Wynne) Not a clear division with acknowledged inadequacies Is this the responsibility of the modeller or risk manager?

    23. Some responses to deeper uncertainties Frank Knight Donald Rumsfeld (+ Zizek) Oliver Cromwell Brian Wynne Ulrich Beck / Anthony Giddens RAND Renn Etc etc [almost all concerned with environmental risk] Risk assessment to risk management

    24. Frank Knight (1885-1972) Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit (1921) The essential fact is that 'risk' means in some cases a quantity susceptible of measurement, while at other times it is something distinctly not of this character; and there are far-reaching and crucial differences in the bearings of the phenomena depending on which of the two is really present and operating.... It will appear that a measurable uncertainty, or 'risk' proper, as we shall use the term, is so far different from an unmeasurable one that it is not in effect an uncertainty at all

    25. Memorable quote #325

    27. Brian Wynne (1992) Risk know the odds Uncertainty parameter/structure Ignorance dont know what we dont know, scientific errors Indeterminacy Causal chains open due to human element Emphasises that modelling conclusions are contingent upon truth of assumptions

    28. Ulrich Beck / Anthony Giddens Risk Society where we increasingly live on a high technological frontier which no one completely understands and which generates a diversity of possible futures Manufactured risk is risk created by the very progression of human development .. We often dont really know what the risks are, let alone how to calculate them accurately in terms of probability tables organised irresponsibility a diversity of humanly created risks for which people and organisations are certainly responsible in a sense that they are its authors but where no one is held specifically accountable.

    29. RAND (Bob Lempert etc) Robust decision-making Neither optimal nor precautionary Trades some optimal performance for less sensitivity to assumptions Satisficing over a wide range of futures Keeping options open

    30. Ortwin Renn (2004)

    32. Damocles dams, nuclear Cyclops earthquakes, volcanoes Pythia sudden catastrophic climate events Pandora unintended man-made effect Cassandra climate change Medusa - EMR

    33. Conclusions Statisticians/modellerd tend to have (or at least are taught) a rather narrow view of uncertainty Different communities approach the hierarchy of uncertainty from opposite ends Impact of different sources of uncertainty needs to be clearly communicated Robust use of quantitative methods, with due humility, is of huge value

More Related