1 / 22

ATHENS EFIMAS MEETING

ATHENS EFIMAS MEETING. A comparison between capacity reduction and temporary withdrawal in the Ligurian Sea Hake fishery. Institute for Economic Research in Fishery and Aquaculture (IREPA). Athens, 19th-20th October 2006. Model structure.

hhyland
Télécharger la présentation

ATHENS EFIMAS MEETING

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ATHENS EFIMAS MEETING A comparison between capacity reduction and temporary withdrawal in the Ligurian Sea Hake fishery Institute for Economic Research in Fishery and Aquaculture (IREPA) Athens, 19th-20th October 2006

  2. Model structure The proposed tool is a bio-economic simulation model. The objective is to evaluate the effects of the management measures Economic box Catch Profit Tax Subsidies Management Activity Capacity Selectivity Biological box State Variation Activity Capacity Activity Capacity t = t+1

  3. Age-structured model for the target species: european hake A modified Schaefer model for the group “other species” Biological box

  4. Economic box • Prices by species and fleet segment: • Constant • Landings function by flexibility coefficients • Differentiated by length classes • Costs by fleet segment: • Variable costs in function of days at sea • Fixed costs in function of GRT

  5. Step: monthly Fishing gears: Trawl Gillnet 1 Gillnet 2 Step: yearly Fleet segments: Bottom trawl Small scale Polyvalent Biological box vs. Economic box Biological box Economic box

  6. Fleet segments → Fishing gears For each target species and month, landings and days at sea by fleet segments are transformed in landings and days at sea by fishing gear. Cs is the vector of the monthly landings by fleet segment. Ds,a is the distribution matrix of landings by fleet segments to the fishing gears. Ca is the vector of monthly landings by fishing gear.

  7. State variation This box considers the endogenous variables in the model subjected to be modified by the natural dynamic of the fishery sector: • Average days at sea by fleet segment; • GRT by fleet segment; • Fishing mortality by new investments in technology. • Prices by species and fleet segment.

  8. Management measures • Technical measures: gear-species selectivity variation; • Temporary withdrawal; • Capacity reduction plans; • Fishing gear suspension; • Variations in tax rates and subsidies; • Mixed measures based on the above variable.

  9. Output data • Biological variables (by fishing gear-species) • Economic variables (by fleet segment-species) • Technical variables (by fleet segment) • Biological indicators (by fishing gear-species) • Economic indicators (by fleet segment-species)

  10. Simulation: management measures • Capacity reduction: a 20% reduction in term of GRT for the vessels practising trawl fishery. The management measure is implemented in the year 2008. • Temporary withdrawal: a stop of 45 days for the bottom trawlers, from 1st August to 15th September for each simulation year by starting in 2008.

  11. Basic assumptions • Prices by species and fleet segment: constant; • Average days at sea by fleet segment: constant; • GRT by fleet segment: constant; • No effect on the fishing mortality by investments in technology. The technology is considered constant along the whole simulation period.

  12. Capacity reduction: General Results

  13. Capacity reduction: Biomass by target species

  14. Capacity reduction: Total landings by fleet segment

  15. Capacity reduction: Net profit by fleet segment

  16. Temporary withdrawal: General Results

  17. Temporary withdrawal: Biomass by target species

  18. Temporary withdrawal: Total landings by fleet segment

  19. Temporary withdrawal: Net profit by fleet segment

  20. Biomass: long-term percent variation

  21. Landings: long-term percent variation

  22. Net profits: long-term percent variation

More Related