1 / 1

METHODOLOGY: Hybrid ‘INPUT OUTPUT’ Analysis

Raw Material Extraction / Harvest. UVM BUILT Capital. Industry. Social Capital. Final Demand. Product Manufacture. 1 2 . i . . n. Human Capital. Purchases of goods/services from industry 2 by industry i. Household/Govt Consumption, IM-EX. Natural Capital.

hisa
Télécharger la présentation

METHODOLOGY: Hybrid ‘INPUT OUTPUT’ Analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Raw Material Extraction / Harvest UVM BUILT Capital Industry Social Capital Final Demand Product Manufacture 1 2 . i . . n Human Capital Purchases of goods/services from industry 2 by industry i Household/Govt Consumption,IM-EX Natural Capital Industry 1 2 . i . . n ProductDistribution AIKEN BUILT Capital Total Output/Revenue of Industry i Social Capital Human Capital Construction Natural Capital Sales of goods/services to industry 2 by industry i Operation & Maintenance Value Added Tax, Labour & Profit/Loss Recycle & Disposal Total Inputs/Costs + Profit/Loss ofIndustry i VERMONT BUILT Capital Social Capital Decrease in welfare Increase in welfare Depreciation / Depletion Costs Appreciation / Accumulation Benefits Human Capital Natural Capital Project Stakeholders Structure Function Structure Budget Aiken Design Process THE GREENING OF AIKEN RESULTS Material Assessment & Evaluation: • PURPOSE OF OUR RESEARCH • Raise profile of Material Assessment in Eco Design • Construct Materials Calculator • Highlight 4 Capital Source of Welfare • Calculate the Full Cost of ‘Greening Aiken’ • Illuminate Return on Investment of Eco Design • Provide Data Input to Simulation Model • Provide a compass for the wider Greening of UVM Full Cost & Benefit Accounting RESULTS Material Comparison INSULATION: Mineral Wool or Cellulose? METHODOLOGY: Hybrid ‘INPUT OUTPUT’ Analysis RESULTS Project Evaluation RESULTS Data Input for Simulation Modeling • Conclusions • Material private costs approximately 75% of Full Cost • Green House Gases the overriding impact • Material production impact a less understood component of ecological design • The ‘heavy’ eco design scenario is the favorable investment • Recommendations • Full Cost & Benefit Accounting (FCBA) should be integral to the Eco Design and wider ‘Greening of UVM’ process. • FCBA enables decision makers to understand the wider impacts of their intentions in a comparable and quantifiable manner. • In greening Aiken and UVM, a strategic compass is required - FCBA provides this compass. • FCBA is an umbrella framework, that would allow all UVM departments to compare and track their progress toward sustainability. ECOLOGICAL DESIGN STUDIO | Profs. John Todd and Robert Costanza. GROUP MEMBERS: Juan P. Alvez | Eric B. Cyzner | Lauren A. Hibbard | Shane M. Murphy | Daniel Lopez Dias | THE UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT

More Related