overview of wireless networking n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Overview of Wireless Networking PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Overview of Wireless Networking

Overview of Wireless Networking

128 Vues Download Presentation
Télécharger la présentation

Overview of Wireless Networking

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. Overview of Wireless Networking • Wireless Link Characteristics • Services and Applications

  2. Overview • Fundamental issues and impact • wireless • mobility • For each layer in the protocol stack • A subset of design requirements • Design challenges/constraints • Possible design options

  3. Wireless Channel Characteristics • Radio propagation • Multipath, fade, attenuation, interference & capture • Received power is inversely proportional to the distance: distance-power gradient • Free space: factor 2 • Inbuilding corridors or large open indoor areas: <2 • Metal buildings: factor 6 • Recommended simulation factors: 2~3 for residential areas, offices and manufacturing floors; 4 for urban radio communications

  4. Wireless Channel • Wireless transmission is error prone • Wireless error and contention are location dependent • Wireless channel capacity is also location dependent

  5. Link-Level Measurements • Measurements taken from 802.11b-based MIT Roofnet • Focus: • Explore reasons for loss • mainly on long outdoor links

  6. Roofnet: multihop wireless mesh 1 kilometer

  7. Using omni-direction antenna + Easy to deploy + Provide high connectivity - Don’t allow engineered link quality

  8. Lossy radio links are common Broadcast packet delivery probability 70-100% 30-70% 1-30% 1 kilometer

  9. Delivery prob. uniformly distributed Broadcast Packet Delivery Probability > two-thirds of links deliver less than 90% Node Pair

  10. Implications Protocols should exploit intermediate-quality links • Link-quality-aware routing (ETX, LQSR) • 802.11 transmit bit-rate selection • Multicast data distribution • Opportunistic protocols (OMAC, ExOR) • An emerging research direction

  11. Hypotheses for intermediate delivery probability • Marginal signal-to-noise ratios • Interference: Long bursts • Interference: Short bursts (802.11) • Multi-path interference

  12. Methodology: Link-level measurements of packet loss • Goal: all-pairs loss rates • Each node broadcasts for 90 seconds • All other nodes listen • Raw link-level measurements: • No ACKs, retransmissions, RTS/CTS • No other Roofnet traffic • No 802.11 management frames • No carrier sense

  13. Hypothesis 1: Marginal S/N • Simplified model for packet loss: • P(delivery) = f(signal/noise) • Signal strength reflects attenuation • Noise reflects interference • Perhaps marginal S/N explains intermediate delivery probabilities

  14. Delivery vs. S/N with a cable and attenuator Broadcast packet delivery probability Laboratory Signal-to-noise ratio (dB)

  15. Laboratory Roofnet Delivery vs. S/N on Roofnet Broadcast packet delivery probability Signal-to-noise ratio (dB) S/N does not predict delivery probability for intermediate-quality links

  16. Hypothesis 2: long bursts of interference A B Bursty noise might corrupt packets without affecting S/N measurements

  17. Loss over time on two different Roofnet links avg: 0.5 stddev: 0.28 Delivery probability avg: 0.5 stddev: 0.03 Time (seconds) The top graph is consistent with bursty interference. The bottom graph is not.

  18. Most links aren’t bursty Cumulative fraction of node pairs Std dev of one-second delivery averages

  19. Hypothesis 3: short bursts of interference (802.11) A B • MAC doesn’t prevent all concurrent xmits • Outcome depends on relative signal levels • Hypothesis: When a nearby AP sends a packet, we lose a packet.

  20. Methodology: record non-Roofnet 802.11 traffic • Goal: measure non-Roofnet traffic • Before the broadcast experiments • Each node records all 802.11 traffic

  21. No correlation between foreign traffic observed and packets lost Experiment packets lost per second Non-Roofnet packets observed per second (before the experiment)

  22. Hypothesis 4: Multi-path interference B B A Reflection is a delayed and attenuated copy of the signal

  23. Receiver Sender A channel emulator to investigate multi-path effects delay attenuation

  24. Reflection causes intermediate packet loss Delivery probability Delay of second ray (nanoseconds or feet)

  25. Roofnet links are long Cumulative fraction of links Link distance (feet or nanoseconds) It’s reasonable to expect delays >500 ns

  26. Summary • Most Roofnet links have intermediate loss rates • S/N does not predict delivery probability • Loss is not consistent with bursty interference • Multi-path is likely to be a major cause

  27. Satellites • Geostationary Earth Orbit (GEO) Satellites • example: Inmarsat SAT ground stations

  28. SAT constellation SAT SAT ground stations Satellites • Low-Earth Orbit (LEO) Satellites • example: Iridium (66 satellites, 2.4 Kbps)

  29. Satellites • GEO • long delay: 250-300 ms propagation delay • LEO • relatively low delay: 40 - 200 ms • large variations in delay - multiple hops/route changes, relative motion of satellites, queueing

  30. Wireless Connectivity - Characteristics • Transmission errors • Wireless LANs - 802.11, Hyperlan • Cellular wireless • Multi-hop wireless • Satellites • Low bandwidth • Cellular wireless • Packet radio (e.g., Metricom) • Long or variable latency • GEO, LEO satellites • Packet radio - high variability • Asymmetry in bandwidth, error characteristics • Satellites (example: DirectPC)

  31. Mobility • Why mobility? • 30~40% of the US workforce is mobile (Yankee group) • Hundreds of millions of users are already using portable computing devices and more than 60% of them are prepared to pay for wireless access to the backbone information

  32. Mobility • Four types of activities for a typical office work during a workday: • Communication (fax, email) • Data manipulation (word processing, directory services, document access & retrieval) • Information access (database access and update, internet access and search) • Information share (groupware, shared file space) • Question: how does mobility affect each of the above activities?

  33. Possible scenarios of mobility • Scenario 1: user logs out from computer 1, moves to computer 2 and logs in • Should the user see the same workspace? • Scenario 2: different devices for different networks • Scenario 3: user docks a laptop, works in a networked mode for a while, then disconnects and works in the standalone mode for a while, and then docks back • In stand-alone mode • What kind of activities can the user do? • What cannot be done? • Can we provide an illusion of connectivity in this case? • Can we automatically re-integrate the work he has done while disconnected when he finally reconnects to the network server?

  34. Impact of Mobility • Scenario 4: a user has a notebook with a wireless connection, connects to a remote host via network 1, shuts down connections, connects to the remote host via network 2, continues to work • Is the disconnection between network migration necessary? • When can we make the disconnection transparent to users? When we cannot? • What are the key issues to ensure seamless network migration? • Is it really important or users do not care about the automatic process? For what applications? What to change for the applications?

  35. Protocol Stack • Look at: • Applications/Services • OS issues • Middleware (skip): • Transcoding Application Layer Middleware and OS Transport Layer Network Layer Link Layer & Below

  36. Issues in building services in mobile networking environments • Mobility induced issues: • Seamless services: service migration • Location services: location itself is a service • Heterogeneity induced issues: • Hardware diversity • Client devices & different networks • Software diversity • System software: OS, networking protocols • Application software • Wireless induced issues: • Time-varying network connectivity: disconnection, partial connection, full connection

  37. Possible services for mobile environments • Location service • Location transparent services • Hide locations from users • Location dependent services • Services “local” to a geographic location • Not available globally • Location aware services • Services are globally available, but multiple instantiations of the same service are a function of locations • Service adapts to a location

  38. Issues in Operating Systems • Energy-efficient scheduler • File systems for disconnected operation due to mobility and disconnected wireless links • access the same file as if connected • retain the same consistency semantics for shared files as if connected • availability and reliability as if connected • ACID (atomic/recoverability, consistent, isolated/ serializablity, durable) properties for transactions • Constraints: • disconnection and/or partial connection • low bandwidth connection • variable bandwidth and latency connection • connection cost

  39. Next Step: Networking Issues

  40. Physical/MAC Layer • Requirements: • Continuous access to the channel to transmit a frame without error • Fair access to the channel: how is fairness quantified? • Low power consumption • Increase channel throughput within the given frequency band • Constraints: • Channel is error prone • Channel contention and error are location dependent • Transmission range is limited (but also enables channel reuse) • Shared channel (hidden/exposed station problem)

  41. Physical/MAC Layer • Possible options: • Physical layer: • Narrow band vs wide band: direct sequence, frequency hopping, OFDM • Antenna technology: smart antenna, directional antenna, MIMO • Adaptive modulation • MAC layer • Multiple access protocols (CSMA/CA, MACAW, etc.) • Frame reservation protocols (TDMA, DQRUMA, etc.)

  42. Link Layer • Requirements: • Error sensitive application • A reliable link abstraction on top of error-prone physical channels • Delay sensitive application • A bounded delay link abstraction on top of error-prone channels • Constraints: • Errors in the channel • Spatial congestion • Link capacity is changing (PHY multi-rate option)

  43. Link Layer • Possible options at the link layer • Windowing to provide error and flow control • Combating error: • Proactive: error correction via e.g. FEC • Reactive: error detection+retransmission, ARQ • Channel-state prediction+channel swapping • Fairness options: long term vs short term, deterministic vs probabilistic, temporal vs throughput • All links are treated equal • Users in error prone or congested location suffer

  44. Network Layer • Requirements: • Maintain connectivity while user roams • Allow IP to integrate transparently with roaming hosts • Address translation to map location-independent addressing to location dependent addressing • Packet forwarding • Location directory • Support multicast, anycast • Ability to switch interfaces on the fly to migrate between failure-prone networks • Ability to provide quality of service: what is QoS in this environment?

  45. Network Layer • Constraint: • Unaware hosts running IP • Route management for mobile hosts needs to be dynamic • A backbone may not exist (ad-hoc network)

  46. Network Layer • Possible options: • Mobile IP and its variants • Two-tier addressing (location independent addressing <-> location dependent addressing) • A smart forwarding agent which encapsulates packets from unware host to forward them to MH • Location directory for managing location updates • Ad hoc routing • Shortest path, source routing, multipath routing

  47. Transport Layer • Requirements: • Congestion control and rate adaptation • Doing the right thing in the presence of different packet losses • Handling different losses (mobility-induced disconnection, channel, reroute) • Improve transient performance • Constraints: • Typically unware of mobility, yet affected by mobility • Packet may be lost due to congestion, channel error, handoffs, change of interfaces, rerouting failures • Link-layer and transport layer retransmit interactions

  48. Transport Layer • Options: • Provide indirection • Make transport layer at the end hosts ware of mobility • Provide smarts in intermediate nodes (e.g. BS) to make lower-layer transport aware • Provide error-free link layers