1 / 11

PROJECT TITLE Principal Investigator Co-Investigators PI’s Organization

Your Institution’s Logo here. PROJECT TITLE Principal Investigator Co-Investigators PI’s Organization ONR Naval Biosciences and Biocentric Technology: Synthetic Biology and Microbial Fuel Cells 6.1-6.2 Program Review. July 23-25, 2013. OBJECTIVE.

hoai
Télécharger la présentation

PROJECT TITLE Principal Investigator Co-Investigators PI’s Organization

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Your Institution’s Logo here PROJECT TITLE Principal Investigator Co-Investigators PI’s Organization ONR Naval Biosciences and Biocentric Technology: Synthetic Biology and Microbial Fuel Cells 6.1-6.2 Program Review July 23-25, 2013

  2. OBJECTIVE Briefly describe the motivation and objective of the project. NOTE: Try to limit to one page.

  3. TECHNICAL APPROACH Briefly describe the specific approach taken to accomplish the objective of the research. Describe methods and techniques used. NOTE: 1. This section may encompass more than one slide. 2. Concise text along with diagrams or schematic descriptions and pictures work best.

  4. ACCOMPLISHMENTS • Describe specific accomplishments during the past year. • Provide a list of interim prototypes, products, papers, patents, etc. (if applicable). • NOTE: • 1. This section may encompass several slides. • 2. Use of graphics/pictures/graphs/tables is strongly encouraged. Ensure font size on graphics/tables/graphs is large enough to be easily read by the audience. • This section is expected to make up the majority of your presentation. • It is understood (by the program officers) that new projects that have only been funded for a few months will have a greater emphasis on approach and plans than accomplishments.

  5. Issues • Describe any technical or non-technical issue that you encountered during the past year. • NOTE: • Try to limit to 1 slide • Include information such as difficulty in recruiting staff, foreign student visa issues, experiments that didn’t go as planned, delays due to equipment issues, other factors that might affect the planned direction of the work.

  6. CONCLUSIONS Summarize conclusions resulting from your work to date.

  7. CURRENT AND FUTURE WORK Explain what you will do this year and your plans (or recommendations) for future work pertaining to this project. Note that for projects that are ending 9/30/11 proposals for future work will be considered for FY12 and beyond. You will be advised following the review as to whether or not ONR would like to see a white paper and/or full proposal.

  8. RECENT PUBLICATIONS,PATENTS, AWARDS • Provide a list of all publications, patents, awards, etc. resulting from this work for the past year (July 2012 – July 2013).

  9. RELEVANCE TO NAVY Briefly describe how you feel the results of this project will help address Navy’s requirements in your area. NOTE: Try to limit to one page.

  10. Cooperative Development • Please indicate if you have leveraged other sources of funds which extend, accelerate or may help transition the ONR-funded effort • NOTE: • Include in-house funded efforts as well as extramurally funded efforts such as grants, contracts, CRADA’s for research that is complementary to that which ONR is funding. • Funding amounts and period of performance would be appreciated , but are not required.

  11. TRANSITION PLAN Identify how you will transition this research from basic research into applied research (if 6.1 funded), or from 6.2 applied funding into 6.3 or prototype development-type efforts. Another way of thinking of this is, “Is there a vision for how the research would be used in an application, and by whom? What would be required to get there (funds, technology hurdles, etc)?” This can be through DOD or other Federally-funded programs or it may be through commercialization by a private industry partner.

More Related