1 / 26

RECOVERY and RECONSTRUCTION after the PAKISTAN EARTHQUAKE

RECOVERY and RECONSTRUCTION after the PAKISTAN EARTHQUAKE . CHOOSING OPTIONS THAT WILL FACILITATE LONG-TERM RECOVERY THE OCTOBER 8, 2005 DISASTER. OCTOBER 8, 2005 PAKISTAN EARTHQUAKE. LONG-TERM RECOVERY NEEDS AFTER PAKISTAN EARTHQUAKE.

hoai
Télécharger la présentation

RECOVERY and RECONSTRUCTION after the PAKISTAN EARTHQUAKE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. RECOVERY and RECONSTRUCTION after the PAKISTAN EARTHQUAKE CHOOSING OPTIONS THAT WILL FACILITATE LONG-TERM RECOVERY THE OCTOBER 8, 2005 DISASTER

  2. OCTOBER 8, 2005 PAKISTAN EARTHQUAKE

  3. LONG-TERM RECOVERY NEEDS AFTER PAKISTAN EARTHQUAKE • NEED: 2 TO 3 MILLION NEW DWELLINGS THAT ARE EARTHQUAKE RESILIENT. • NEED: NEW SCHOOLS THAT ARE EARTHQUAKE RESILIENT. • NEED: NEW HOSPITALS THAT ARE EARTHQUAKE RESILIENT. • NEED: INFRASTRUCTURE THAT IS EARTHQUAKE RESILIENT.

  4. GOAL • TO MARSHAL AND INTEGRATE THE COMMUNITY’S STAPLE FORCES,.. • …GIVING ALL SECTORS EQUITY IN DESIGNING PROCESSES FOR BECOMING EARTHQUAKE RESILIENT.

  5. TO BECOME RESILIENT TO GROUND SHAKING, LANDSLIDES, AND AFTERSHOCKS TO ADOPT AND IMPLEMENT PUBLIC POLICY MANDATES FOR PREVENMTION, MITIGATION, PREPAREDNESS, EMERGENCY RESPONSE, AND RECOVERY AND RECONSTRUCTION OBJECTIVES

  6. USE STATE-OF-ART TOOLS FOR ASSESSING HAZARDS AND RISK (E.G., GROUND SHAKING MAPS AND HAZUS) USE PROVEN TECHNOLOGY FOR REDUCING VULNERABILITY IN THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT(E.G., ENERGY DISSIPATION) OBJECTIVES

  7. INCREASED PUBLIC AWARENESS IMPROVED PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING EXPANDED MONITORING AND WARNING SYSTEMS MODERN BUILDING CODES FOR NEW BUILDINGS MODERN STANDARDS FOR NEW INFRASTRUCTURE STRENGTHENING AND RETROFIT FOR EXISTING STRUCTURES EXPANDED INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION PROCESSES FOR BECOMING EARTHQUAKE RESILIENT

  8. IN-COUNTRY BASIC AND APPLIED RESEARCH LESSONS FROM THE OCTOBER 8, 2005 DISASTER MAPS INFORMATION GUIDELINES FOR APPLICATIONS BY EMERGENCY MANAGERS, BUILDING OFFICIALS, AND URBAN PLANNERS STARTING POINTS

  9. LESSONS FROM PAKISTAN EARTHQUAKE • THE EARTHQUAKE OCCURRED ALONG THE MAIN BOUNDARY THRUST ZONE (MBT). • THE MBT RUNS ALONG THE HIMALAYAN ARC FOR ABOUT 2,500 KM..

  10. LESSONS FROM PAKISTAN EARTHQUAKE • CONSTRUCTION WAS MAINLY CONCENTRATED ON THE FLOOD- PLAIN DEPOSITS OF THE NEEHLAN, JAHLUM, AND KUNHAR RIVERS. • BUILDINGS IM MUZAFFARABAD SITED ON SAND AND GRAVEL DEPOSITS WERE SEVERELY DAMAGED. • BUILDINGS SITED ON ROCK WERE NOT SEVERELY DAMAGED.

  11. HAZARD MAPS • INVENTORY • VULNERABILITY • LOCATION • PREVENTION/MITIGATION • PREPAREDNESS • EMERGENCY RESPONSE • RECOVERY and • RECONSTRUCTION RISK ASSESSMENT RISK MANAGEMENT ACCEPTABLE RISK RISK UNACCEPTABLE RISK TOWARDS EARTHQUAKE RESILIENCE DATA BASES AND INFORMATION COMMUNITY HAZARDS: GROUND SHAKING GROUND FAILURE SURFACE FAULTING TECTONIC DEFORMATION TSUNAMI RUN UP AFTERSHOCKS

  12. IMPORTANCE AND VALUE OF STRUCTURE EXPOSURE MODEL VULNERABILTY MODEL SEISMOTECTONIC SETTING LOCATION OF STRUCTURE QUALITY OF DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION RESISTANCE TO LATERAL FORCES POLITICAL PROCESS MITIGATION COSTS EXPERIENCE AND RESEARCH DAMAGE ALDORITHM INCORPORATE NEW KNOWLEDGE INSPECTION AND REGULATION EARTHQUAKE HAZARDS MODEL ACCEPTABLE RISK ADOPTION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF PUBLIC POLICIES ASSESSMENT OF RISK

  13. OPTIONS FOR EARTHQUAKE DISASTER RESILIENCE WHAT IS THE BENEFIT/COST OF EACH ONE? HOW QUICKLY CAN EACH OPTION BE IMPLEMENTED?

  14. BENEFIT/COST BUILDING CODE WITH SEISMIC DESIGN PROVISIONS PREVENTS COLLAPSE AND REDUCES LOSS OF LIFE AND DAMAGE 1 < BENEFIT/COST < 1,000

  15. BENEFIT/COST STANDARDS FOR LIFELINE SYSTEMS PROTECTS COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE 1 < BENEFIT/COST < 1,000

  16. BENEFIT/COST DEMOLITION OF COLLAPSE HAZARD BUILDINGS PREVENT COLLAPSE AND LOSS OF LIFE 1 < BENEFIT/COST < 1,000

  17. BENEFIT/COST SEISMIC ZONATION AVOIDS LOCATIONS MOST SUSCEPTIBLE TO STRONG SHAKING, SURFACE FAULTING, SOIL AMPLIFICATION, AND SOIL FAILURE 1 < BENEFIT/COST < 100

  18. BENEFIT/COST RETROFIT AND STRENGTHENING PREVENT COLLAPSE; ELIMINATE VULNERABILITIES; REDUCE DAMAGE 1 < BENEFIT/COST < 100

  19. BENEFIT/COST EDUCATION AND TRAINING TO IMPLEMENT CHANGE EXPANDS PROFESSIONAL AND POLITICAL CAPACITY 1 < BENEFIT/COST < 100

  20. BENEFIT/COST SOILREMEDIATION PREVENTS LIQUEFACTION, LANDSLIDES, AND LATERAL SPREADS 1 < BENEFIT/COST < 100

  21. BENEFIT/COST PERFORMANCE BASED DESIGN PREVENTS LOSS OF FUNCTION AND USE OF MOST IMPORTANT STRUCTURES 1 < BENEFIT/COST < 100

  22. BENEFIT/COST URBAN AND LAND-USE PLANNING FACILITATES AVOIDANCE STRATEGIES 1 < BENEFIT/COST < 10

  23. BENEFIT/COST DISASTER SCENARIONS FACILITATES PREPARATION FOR EXPECTED AND UNEXPECTED 1< BENEFIT/COST < 10

  24. BENEFIT/COST RELOCATION AND REROUTING REDUCES LIKELIHOOD OF DAMAGE AND LOSS 1< BENEFIT/COST < 10

  25. BENEFIT/COST NON-STRUCTURAL MITIGATION PROTECTS CONTENTS AND EQUIPMENT 1 < BENEFIT/COST < 1,000

  26. HAZARD MAPS • INVENTORY • VULNERABILITY • LOCATION • PREVENTION/MITIGATION • PREPAREDNESS • EMERGENCY RESPONSE • RECOVERY and • RECONSTRUCTION RISK ASSESSMENT RISK MANAGEMENT ACCEPTABLE RISK RISK UNACCEPTABLE RISK TOWARDS EARTHQUAKE RESILIENCE DATA BASES AND INFORMATION COMMUNITY HAZARDS: GROUND SHAKING GROUND FAILURE SURFACE FAULTING TECTONIC DEFORMATION TSUNAMI RUN UP AFTERSHOCKS

More Related