1 / 17

Coding Procedures (Data Extraction)

Coding Procedures (Data Extraction). 6.0. Purpose Identify characteristics that may provide an objective explanation of intervention effects. Provide the reader with a transparent standard of the extracted data. A. Publication Source Journal 2. Dissertation 3.Thesis

holden
Télécharger la présentation

Coding Procedures (Data Extraction)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Coding Procedures (Data Extraction) 6.0 Purpose • Identify characteristics that may provide an objective explanation of intervention effects. • Provide the reader with a transparent standard of the extracted data

  2. A. Publication Source • Journal 2. Dissertation 3.Thesis 4. Unpublished Paper 5. Book 6. Other: ________ B. Subject Characteristics (page(s): ____________) Group Pretest Posttest Attrition Age Grade(s) (n) (n) (n) (n) (n) (n) Tx: ______ _____ ______ ______ ______ _____ Cp: ______ _____ ______ ______ ______ _____ Co: ______ _____ ______ ______ ______ _____

  3. C. Socioeconomic Status (page(s):___________ • Low 2. Middle 3. Upper • 4. Low-Middle 5. Middle Upper 6. Labeled Mixed • Unclear 8. ___________ 9. NR • Comments:__________________________________

  4. D. Sample Source (page(s)_________) • Public School • 2. Secular Private School • 3. Religious Private School • 4. Other:_________________ • 5. NR • Comments

  5. E. Study Setting (page(s) ______) • Urban 2. Suburban 3. Rural • Geographic Setting: ______________________ • Comments:

  6. F. Author’s Labeling of Participants’ Achievement Levels (page _____) • Average Achieving 2. High Achieving 3. Underachieving • 4. At-Risk 5. Unclear • 6. Other:___________________ 7. NR • G. Race/Ethnicity (page ______) • African American 2. American Indian 3. Asian • 4. Hispanic/Latino 5. White • 6. Other: ____________________ 7. NR

  7. H. Intervention Characteristics • Type of intervention (page __________________) • Total length of intervention program: __________ or NR (page _____) • Length of time PER intervention session:________ or NR (page _____) • Number of sessions: ________ per ________ or NR (page _____) • Describe the intervention(s) intended for delivery to the study groups including how and when it was administered. ______________________________________________

  8. Fidelity of implementation data reported? (page(s)______) • 0=No 1=Yes • If yes, describe the intervention(s) intended for delivery to the study groups including how and when it was administered: • ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ • 7. Intervention implemented as described? (page(s) _____) • 1=No 2=Yes 3= Somewhat 9=NR

  9. Outcome Measure(s)

  10. J. Design Characteristics • Recruitment Pool (page_____) • Referral 2. Criterion 3. Norm Reference Test • 4. Existing Group 5. Cohort 6. Volunteer • Other ___________________ 9. NR • Research Design Type (pg____) • Randomized Design • Group (Cluster, Place-based) Randomized Design • Quasi-Experiment: Interrupted Time Series Design* • Quasi-Experiment: Regression Discontinuity* • Quasi-Experiment: Nonequivalent Comparison Group Design* • Pre-Experimental: Single Group Pre/Posttest Design* • Single Subject Design* • Other Designs: _____________________________________

  11. K. Assignment Procedures • Subject Assignment (page(s) _____) • Individual Random • Group Random • Individual Match Random • Quasi-random

  12. Method of Random Allocation (page(s) _____)

  13. Was concealment of allocation used as part of the • randomization procedures? • 1=no 2= yes 3=NR • a. If yes, were the allocation procedures concealed from • any of the following people? • Researcher (pg _____) • 2. Participant (pg _____) • 3. Intervener (pg _____) • 4. Assessor (pg _____)

  14. L. Quasi-Experimental Assignment Procedures • (If applicable, otherwise skip to section M) • 1. Was any of the following research design techniques used to equate groups prior to the intervention? • a. Matching on pretest proxy (pg _____) • b. Matching on a pretest (pg _____) • c. Matching on other variables (pg _____) • d. No Matching (pg _____) • 2. Was statistical equating used prior to the intervention? 1=no 2=yes 3=NR • Comments:________________________________________

  15. M. Effect Size Characteristics • Comparisons: Group 1: _________vs. Group 2:_________ • Outcomes __________ __________ ___________ • Groups __1__ _2_ __1__ __2__ __1_ __2__ • Mean _____ _____ _____ _____ ____ _____ • SD _____ _____ _____ _____ ____ _____ • N at Posttest _____ _____ _____ _____ ____ _____ • F value _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ ____ • Chi-square _____ __ ___ _____ _____ _____ ____ • p value _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ • t value _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____

  16. Method of Analysis (pg _____) a. Intention to Treat: b. Treated Participants Only

  17. 7.0: Excerpt from Master Coding Guide for Study Coding Code the Fantuzzo Study (7.1)

More Related