1 / 3

Transcriptomic and Proteomic Insights into Invasiveness of Phragmites australis

This study presents a comprehensive analysis of the common reed, Phragmites australis, utilizing next-generation sequencing to explore its transcriptomic and proteomic profiles. The research reveals key genes associated with the species' invasiveness and specific adaptations related to rhizome development. The findings contribute to our understanding of the mechanisms driving the spread of P. australis in various ecosystems, supported by detailed data supplements outlining child terms in transport, signal transduction, and metabolic processes related to gene expression and function.

holleb
Télécharger la présentation

Transcriptomic and Proteomic Insights into Invasiveness of Phragmites australis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. He et al. – American Journal of Botany 99(2): 232-247. 2012. – Data Supplement S3 – Page 1 He, Ruifeng, Min-Jeong Kim, William Nelson, Tiago S. Balbuena, Ryan Kim, Robin Kramer, John A. Crow, Greg D. May, Jay J. Thelen, Carol A. Soderlund, and David R. Gang. 2012. Next-generation sequencing-based transcriptomic and proteomic analysis of the common reed, Phragmites australis (Poaceae), reveals genes involved in invasiveness and rhizome specificity. American Journal of Botany 99(2): 232-247. Appendix S3.A.Twenty-four child terms in “transport” parent GO group. (%)

  2. He et al. – American Journal of Botany 99(2): 232-247. 2012. – Data Supplement S3 – Page 2 Appendix S3.B. Nine child terms in “signal transduction” parent GO group. (%)

  3. He et al. – American Journal of Botany 99(2): 232-247. 2012. – Data Supplement S3 – Page 3 Appendix S3.C.Seventeen child terms in “metabolic process” parent GO group. (%) Appendix S3-C. 17 child terms in “metabolic process” parent GO group

More Related