1 / 29

Norbert Brinkhoff-Button DG Information Society European Commission

Information Society Technologies in the 6th Framework Programme Overview and update. Norbert Brinkhoff-Button DG Information Society European Commission. IST in FP6 Timetable Vision & strategy Structure. Instruments Overview Integrated Projects Networks of Excellence Article 169

holleb
Télécharger la présentation

Norbert Brinkhoff-Button DG Information Society European Commission

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Information Society Technologies in the 6th Framework Programme Overview and update Norbert Brinkhoff-Button DG Information Society European Commission

  2. IST in FP6 Timetable Vision & strategy Structure Instruments Overview Integrated Projects Networks of Excellence Article 169 Targetted Research Other instruments Web resources Expression of Interest Agenda

  3. The timetable for FP6 February 2001 _____ FP6 proposal to Council & EP May 2001 _________ SP proposal to Council & EP October 2001 ______ 1st reading in EP Dec - Jan 2002 _____ Council position Feb - May 2002 ____ 2nd reading in EP Sept-Oct 2002 _____ Conciliation procedure Oct/Nov 2002 ______ Final adoption of FP, SP & participation rules ~December 2002____ First FP6 call

  4. IST in Context • Challenges • burst of the Internet bubble, economic slowdown • widening research gap with respect to US • faster IST life cycles, fragmented research scene • Union objectives • ERA: moving to a European level research policy • Lisbon council: global race for knowledge • eEurope: concerted action with member states

  5. Vision • Building the knowledge society for ALL • Bring “people” to the foreground - build technologies for the background • ‘Our surrounding is the interface’: everywhere, embedded in everyday objects (e.g: furniture, clothes, vehicles, smart materials, …) • Exploring interfaces beyond “the PC, screens & keyboard” • Enabling multi-sensorial dialogues supported by computing & networking

  6. Strategy • Concentration and critical mass • European level approach • Simplification of procedures • More autonomy and flexibility • Visionary, forward looking • Core technologies AND applications • New organisation of WP, Calls, etc

  7. Structure Knowledge and Interface Technologies FET Communication, Computing and Software Components and Microsystems Technologies for Major Societaland Economic Challenges Ind. Budget:3,600 ME(+Géant, grids)

  8. Main research headings • Technologies for major societal & economic challenges • health, mobility, environment, cultural heritage... • e-business, e-government, e-/m-commerce, e-learning... • trust and security, GRID’s and complex problem solving • Communication, computing and software technologies • mobile and wireless systems, wireless re-configurable IP, all-optical networks... • software, embedded and distributed systems, network embedded systems with sensors... • Components and micro-systems • pushing the limits of CMOS, optical, photonic components... • micro and nano-technologies, microsystems, displays, micro and nano structures and new materials...

  9. Knowledge and Interface Technologies • Knowledge technologies • Cognitive and agent-based tools supporting the full knowledge lifecycle, enabling new semantic-based and context-aware systems. Aim is to make the Web (and other knowledge resources) machine-processable. • Includes digital media technologies, to support the design, creation, management and delivery of multimedia content, across different networks and platforms • Interfaces and interactive surface technologies • Natural, adaptive and multi-sensorial interface technologies for a seamless human interaction with devices, virtual and physical objects and the knowledge embedded in everyday environments • Multilingual and multicultural access and communication

  10. IST in FP6 Timetable Vision & strategy Structure Instruments Overview Integrated Projects Networks of Excellence Article 169 Targetted Research Other instruments Web resources Expression of Interest Agenda

  11. Overview of FP6 instruments • Integrated Projects • Networks of Excellence • Article 169 (joint implementation of national programmes) • “Stairway of excellence”: • Specific Targeted Research Projects • Co-ordination actions • Support Actions

  12. Integrated Projects - purpose • Achieve clearly defined objectives and results • Integrate the types of activities needed to obtain the goals (full technology chain) • Integrate the critical mass of resources needed to obtain the goals • Support industry-academia collaboration including SME’s

  13. IP - activities • Full technology chain • research and technology development • demonstration • technology transfer or take-up • training and dissemination • Special attention to • appropriate management • coherence

  14. IP - critical mass • Resources • commensurate with objectives • budget up to several tens of M€ • Partnership • min. 3 participants from 3 different countries • Duration • typically 3 - 5 years

  15. IP - financial regime • EU contribution to actual costs • that are necessary for the project (no predefined categories) • determined in accordance with each participant’s own accounting definitions and practices • Annual cost statements • certified by an independent auditor • with a justification of costs coupled to acorresponding activity report • Rolling advance scheme throughout duration

  16. IP - proposals / contracts Provisional…! • Key elements of proposals • S&T objectives, socio-economic impact • outline “implementation plan” for whole duration • detailed implementation plan for first 18 months • global budget estimate, justified • Participants share • joint & several technical responsibility • joint & several financial liability • Community contribution • distribution between participants or between activities does NOT have to be spelled out

  17. IP - implementation • Implementation plans • one overall plan, updateable • detailed workplans, rolling • Changes to the consortium • up to consortium to take in new participants(without additional funding) • the contract will specify when the addition of new participants must involve a competitive call • competitive call by EC to add tasks and funding

  18. Networks of Excellence (NoE) - objectives • To reinforce scientific and technological excellence on a particular theme: European leadership • By integrating research capacities across Europe: overcome fragmentation • To act as a “Virtual Centre of Excellence”: spread excellence beyond partnership

  19. NoE - main features • Joint Programme of Activity (JPA) (RTD, training, transfer, mobility... ) • Established or emerging research fields • Several M€ per year • Minimum of 3 participants bringing together universities, research labs, industrial labs

  20. NoE - “Joint Programme of Activity” • “Re-thought” RTD activities of participants • co-ordinated as “one” RTD programme • less redundancy, better coverage • Integrating activities e.g. • common software libraries • common development platforms • joint RTD teams • exchange of researchers • shared knowledge and IPR • Dissemination • training and technology transfer to industry CRITERIA Excellence and ambition Extent, depth and lasting character Spreading of excellence Management & governance

  21. NoE - flexibility & autonomy • JPA • updateable overall plan • rolling, detailed JPA • Funding • autonomous distribution among partners & activities (consortium agreement) • For changes in the network partnership • consortium may decide on new partners • can be through a competitive call

  22. NoE - financial regime Provisional…! • Grant for integration • ‘incentive’ calculated on the basis of a lump sum per researcher ‘involved’ • 20K€ (?) per researcher/per year - less as number of researchers increases • Payments • disbursed in annual instalments according to planned progress in JPA

  23. Article 169 • At the initiative of the member states • Support to “national” programmes jointly executed (article 169) • Common or priority issues • Increase impact of national efforts • Carried out by governments, national research centres or regional authorities • EU funding to support the joint programmes • Harmonised work programmes • Coordinated assignment of budgets • Launch joint calls for proposals

  24. Targeted RTD projects • Focus on one specific activity & result • research activities of more limited scope & ambition than Integrated Projects • Similar to current RTD contracts • research (50%), demonstration (35%) • combined research & demonstration • More limited partnership • particularly suited for smaller research actors, including SME’s & candidate countries

  25. Coordination & specific support actions • Coordination Actions • similar to current thematic networks • support to logistics, .. • can cover up to 100% of additional costs • Specific Support Actions • an evolved form of the accompanying measures of FP5 • e.g. conferences, seminars, studies and analyses, expert groups, operational support, dissemination, information and communication

  26. Provisional…! FP6 cost models • Cost reimbursement principle, 2 models: • SimplifiedFull Cost Model • 3 cost blocks: personnel, “other” and overheads = more flexibility • standard overhead rate = simplification • ‘Other expenditure’ = all substantial direct costs other than personnel; to be identified in TA • Additional Cost Model • Maximum rates (SFC / AC) • 50% for RTD - 35% for demonstration • 100% of direct costs for management & training • up to 100% of AC for all project components

  27. Web resources - Status updates Detailed provisions and discussion papers on CORDIS for IPs and NoEs http://www.cordis.lu/rtd2002 Other useful links http://www.cordis.lu http:// www.cordis.lu/ist http:// www.cordis.lu/ist/fp6/fp6.htm IST helpdesk Fax: +32 2 296 83 88 E-Mail: ist@cec.eu.int

  28. Invitations for Expressions of Interest • Opened on March 20, deadline June 7 • Stimulate partnerships and proposal building • Invitation for “embryonic” proposals in IPs & NoEs • Response will be analysed and a report produced • An anonymized report is expected to be made public

  29. Conclusion • FP6 is not business as usual • size, complexity, integration • final shaping of instruments still unknown • Good research (ideas) will always be accomodated, whatever the framework • What matters most is simplification of the process, for all stakeholders

More Related