1 / 7

Comprehensive Overview of CENG 421/ELEC 536 Research Methodology Presentation

This presentation template outlines the key components for the CENG 421/ELEC 536 assignments. Key areas include a structured introduction that highlights the relevance and motivation behind the chosen paper, a detailed approach that balances technical details with conceptual explanations, and an evaluation of the authors’ database and experimental results. The conclusion summarizes the paper's contributions while discussing its strengths and limitations. This guide also provides a marking scheme to assess oral presentations, ensuring clarity and engagement during delivery.

holly
Télécharger la présentation

Comprehensive Overview of CENG 421/ELEC 536 Research Methodology Presentation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Template for CENG 421/ELEC536 assignments Author

  2. Outline • List here the main points of your talk • i.e. title of paper, topic etc.

  3. Introduction • Relevance of the chosen paper for your project • Motivation: why have you chosen this particular paper as an assignment? • The big picture: talk briefly about work related to the paper (other authors and papers, how popular is this research topic etc.)

  4. Approach • This is the main part of your presentation • Keep an adequate balance of mathematical details (equations etc.) and conceptual explanations • You may want to illustrate the main points of the algorithm with images from the paper (which need to be properly referenced)

  5. Database and experimental results • What database have the authors used? • How is this database structured? • How did the authors evaluate their approach? • Is there something that they ‘missed’ during the evaluation?

  6. Conclusion • Summarize the main contribution of the presented paper • Discuss the strengths and limits of the paper (not only from the authors’ viewpoint)

  7. Marking scheme • Each oral presentation will count 10 points towards your final course mark. These points will be distributed as follows: • a) Introduction and conclusion: 2 pts • b) Content: 5 pts • a. The ideas that you preset should be well structured • b. Critical thinking: what are the strengths and limits of the presented • approach • c) Delivery: 1 pt • pacing, legibility, organization, and quality of visual aids • d) Quality of answers from questions received from the audience: 1 pt • e) Your active participation during oral presentations of your colleagues 1pt Quality of questions that you ask at the end of other presentations (note: there is no need for asking questions at all other presentations)

More Related