1 / 71

AMERICAN BANKRUPTCY INSTITUTE CONSUMER BANKRUPTCY SEMINAR NOVEMBER 11, 2013

CASE LAW UPDATE. AMERICAN BANKRUPTCY INSTITUTE CONSUMER BANKRUPTCY SEMINAR NOVEMBER 11, 2013. Honorable Marci B. McIvor United States Bankruptcy Court Eastern District of Michigan James Boyd Traverse City, Michigan Thomas D. DeCarlo Staff Attorney

hong
Télécharger la présentation

AMERICAN BANKRUPTCY INSTITUTE CONSUMER BANKRUPTCY SEMINAR NOVEMBER 11, 2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CASE LAW UPDATE AMERICAN BANKRUPTCY INSTITUTECONSUMER BANKRUPTCY SEMINARNOVEMBER 11, 2013 Honorable Marci B. McIvor United States Bankruptcy Court Eastern District of Michigan James Boyd Traverse City, Michigan Thomas D. DeCarlo Staff Attorney Office of David Wm. Ruskin, Chapter 13 Trustee

  2. THE NEW FORMS ARE COMING! THE NEW FORMS ARE COMING!!

  3. Effective December 1, 2013, there are a few new forms that take effect. These include the new form schedules I and J, which take the current one page form and transform them into multiple page forms. The new forms can be found at http://www.uscourts.gov/FormsAndFees/Forms/BankruptcyForms/BankruptcyFormsPendingChanges.aspx Or Google “Amended Bankruptcy Forms”

  4. Recent Supreme Court Cases • Bullock v. BankChampaign, 133 S. Ct. 1754 (2013) – Intent or scienter require to prove defalcation under Section 523(a)(4).

  5. U.S. v. Windsor, ______ US _________, 133 S.Ct. 2675, 2013 WL 3196928 (2013) – Federal Defense of Marriage Act is unconstitutional. Federal Government cannot deny benefits to same sex couples where couple is lawfully married as a matter of state law where the ceremony was performed.

  6. Upcoming Supreme Court Cases In re Bellingham Insurance Agency, Inc., 702 F.3d 553 (9th Cir. 2012), cert granted, ___ U.S. ___ (2013) – Can parties waive objection to subject matter jurisdiction after Stern? In re City of Detroit, 2013 WL 5425104 (Bankr. E.D. Mi. 2013) – authority of bankruptcy court to enter final judgment after Stern.

  7. Law v. Siegel, 435 Fed. Appx. 67 (9th Cir. 2011), cert granted, ___ S. Ct. ___ (2013) – Can Chapter 7 Trustee surcharge debtor’s exemptions to cover administrative costs?

  8. Property of the Estate • Leitch v. Christians, 494 BR 918 (8th Cir. BAP 2013) – Debtor’s interest in Health Savings Account is property of the estate.

  9. Post Petition Property • In re Hargis, 2013 WL 4514090 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 2013) – Property that debtor acquires post-petition such as life insurance proceeds and proceeds of inherited 401-k are property of estate that do not revest and remain property of estate. • Axis Surplus Insurance Company v. Flugence, 732 F.3d 428 (5th Cir. 2013) – Chapter 13 debtor has continuing duty to disclose causes of action that arise post-petition and post-confirmation.

  10. Post Petition Equity • In re Hodges, 2013 WL 1755483 (Bankr. E.D. Tn. 2013) – Equity that accrues in converted case between commencement of Chapter 13 and conversion to Chapter 7 is not property of the estate.

  11. Abandonment Cook v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA, 2013 WL 1297590 (10th Cir. 2013) – Failure to follow procedural requirements of Section 554 and Rule 6007 renders abandonment ineffective.

  12. Authority of Chapter 7 Trustee • In re Przybysz, Case No. 10-7110 (Bankr. W.D. Mi. 2013) – Chapter 7 Trustee of individual debtor’s estate has authority to cause wholly owned subsidiaries to file independent bankruptcy cases.

  13. In re Breece, 2013 WL 197399 (6th Cir. BAP 2013) – Debtor’s status as sole member of LLC does not convey to debtor an ownership interest in the assets of the LLC.

  14. Windham v. East Ohio Gas, 2013 WL 5216429 (N.D. Ohio 2013) – Only Trustee has standing to pursue pre-petition causes of action. • Tyler v. DH Capital Management, Inc., 2013 WL 5942072 (6th Cir. 2013) – All pre-petition causes of action become property of estate upon filing, and only the trustee has standing to pursue actions post-petition.

  15. Judicial Estoppel • Mowder v. Permanent General Assurance Corp. of Ohio, 2013 WL 5923766 (N.D. Ohio 2013) – Chapter 7 Trustee not precluded from pursuing undisclosed asset even if debtor might receive a portion of any award. • In re Rotunda, 2013 WL 486968 (Bankr. D.C. 2013) – Chapter 7 Trustee is not judicially estopped from pursuing unscheduled and undisclosed cause of action but debtor cannot receive any recovery from undisclosed action.

  16. Mortgage Modification In re Brinkley, 2013 WL 5935157 (Bankr. E.D. Mi. 2013) – Prohibition on modification of mortgages on debtor's principal residence applies to the residence where debtor lived on the petition date. Further, debtor’s plan lacked good faith where plan proposed to retain rental property in Florida where rental income is less than monthly expenses.

  17. In re Rogers, 2013 WL 5804003 (Bankr. W.D. Mi. 2013) – Attorney fees cannot be paid ahead of ongoing monthly mortgage payment without constituting improper modification of mortgage.

  18. Attorney Ethics • In re Ortiz, 2013 WL 447890 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2013) –Retainer agreement that purported to limit counsel’s obligations to attend only one 341 meeting, even if not concluded, and limited post-petition services, violated ethical obligations. • In re Slabbinick, 2012 WL 5386677 (Bankr. E.D. Mi. 2012) – Unbundling services into pre- and post-petition services does not per se violate Michigan ethical limitations.

  19. Attorney Fees Carroll v. Goldstein, Bershad & Fried, 2013 WL 1120019 (E.D. Mi. 2013) – Counsel can receive additional attorney fees for time expended in defending prior fee application.

  20. Automatic Stay • Dunn v. Advantage Windows, Inc., 2013 WL 1091737 (Bankr. E.D. Tn. 2013) – Section 362(b)(1) excludes from the automatic stay enforcement of criminal statutes without regard to alleged motivation of creditor in filing criminal complaint.

  21. In re Vega, 2013 WL 3158516 (Bankr. E.D. Mi. 2013) – Creditor holding property pursuant to possessory security interest does not violate stay by retaining property post-petition. • In re Stewart, 2013 WL 5592899 (Bankr. E.D. Mi. 2013) – Creditor’s retention of property of estate and refusal to return property on demand of debtor violated stay.

  22. Lien Strips In re Brisco, 486 BR 422 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2013) – Filing of proof of claim by creditor is prerequisite to determination of secured status. Where creditor does not file claim, creditor does not have “allowed claim” and lien cannot be stripped.

  23. In re Almeida, 2013 BR 1163777 (Bankr. M.D. Fl. 2013) – Condominium Association lien is not within sphere of protection from valuation under Section 506. Debtor in Chapter 7 can strip wholly unsecured condo lien from the property using Section 506.

  24. Abandonment • In re Rosa, 2013 WL 3380166 (Bankr. D. Hawaii 2013) – Chapter 13 plan that provided that confirmation order shall constitute a deed of conveyance of the property when recorded conveyed title to secured creditor who did not object to plan term.

  25. Exemptions • Eleiwa v. Whitmore, 2013 WL 2443086 (9th Cir. BAP 2013) – Debtor could not claim exemption in home owned by Trust.

  26. In re Nickeas, 2013 WL 4017940 (Bankr. W.D. Wis. 2013) – Liquor license is not “tool of the trade even if essential to operation of business. • Maestas v. Old World Construction, Inc., 497 BR 167 (10th Cir. BAP 2013) – Debtor cannot claim real property as “tool of the trade”.

  27. In re Stanley, 2013 WL 2154787 (Bankr. E.D. Mi. 2013) – Benefits paid by State Workers Compensation Fund constitute payments by “insurance company” and are exempt under Section 600.5451 after receipt. Exemption is not limited to entitlement to future benefits, as long as funds remain in cash form.

  28. In re Daley, 2013 WL 2922651 (6th Cir. 2013) – Debtor did not engage in prohibited transaction in IRA by signing account agreement that granted to broker a security interest in the account for any indebtedness that debtor incurred with broker.

  29. In re Clark, 2013 WL 1729600 (7th Cir. 2013) - Non-spousal inherited IRA is not exempt.

  30. Means Test In re Gandy, 2013 WL 3712425 (Bankr. E.D. Tn. 2013) – Creditors are not authorized to go behind the figures listed in the Chapter 7 Statement of Current Monthly Income (Means Test Calculation) for the purposes of filing a §707(b) motion.

  31. Disposable Income • In re Hicks, Case no. 12-64774 (Bankr. E.D. Mi. 2013) – Debtor’s non-filing spouse not required to commit spouse’s income for funding of debtor’s plan where claims being administered in Chapter 13 consist of debts that debtor accrued prior to commencement of the case and spouse was contributing substantial portion of income to the plan.

  32. U.S. Trustee v. Holmes, 2013 WL 4446947 (Bankr. M.D. Pa. 2013) – Debtor could exclude money of debtor’s same sex partner in calculating current monthly income. Debtor not required to include income of partner not used for payment of joint debts.

  33. Liquidation Analysis • In re Engle, 2013 WL 4038625 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 2013) – Debtor’s plan does not satisfy liquidation analysis where plan would impose on Chapter 13 Trustee the obligation to pursue preference recovery. Debtors must either includes anticipated net value of the preference recovery in liquidation calculation or prosecute the recovery action.

  34. Avoidable Transfers Suhar v. Bruno, 2013 WL 5734120 (6th Cir. 2013) – Assumption of third party debt by debtor who does not receive value as part of transaction is not for reasonably equivalent value.

  35. Gold v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA, 2013 WL 3270346 (Bankr. E.D. Mi. 2013) –Any instrument received and recorded by a register of deeds is conclusively presumed to comply with recording requirements.

  36. McClarty v. University Liggett School, 2013 WL 4786861 (Bankr. E.D. Mi. 2013) – Pre-petition payments for debtor’s minor children to attend private school is not constructively fraudulent.

  37. Sikirica v. Wettach, 2013 WL 1289149 (Bankr. W.D. Pa. 2013) – Deposit of paychecks into joint account with spouse is fraudulent transfer to extent funds were not used to pay household or personal expenses of debtor.

  38. Suhar v. Agree Auto Services, Inc., 2013 WL 3993867 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 2013) – Payment of deficiency on prior car avoidable preference.

  39. Student LoansTresedder v. National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2005-2, Case No. 12-99011 (W.D. Mi. 2013) – Private student loans are funded by a non-profit institution where lender intended loans to pay educational expenses and loans were guaranteed by non-profit.

  40. Educational Credit Management Corporation v. Alfes, 709 F.3d 631 (6th Cir. 2013) – Guarantor of debtor’s obligation holds independent claim against debtor. Default judgment against lender in action to determine dischargeability of student loans does not bind non-party guarantor.

  41. Hahn v. Educational Credit Management Corporation, 711 F.3d 235 (1st Cir. 2013) – Order disallowing student loan claim on basis that debtor had paid non-dischargeable student loans prior to commencement of bankruptcy precluded post-discharge efforts to collect alleged balances owed.

  42. Tax Issues • In re Martin, 2013 WL 4094413 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2013) – Debtor can redeem property from pre-petition tax foreclosure sale over life of chapter 13 plan in Chapter 13 filed after the sale occurred but before redemption expired.

  43. U.S. v. Monahan, 497 BR 642 (1st Cir. BAP 2013) – Chapter 13 Plan that provided for payment of IRS priority non-dischargeable claim but did not propose to pay interest did not discharge interest portion of tax debt.

  44. Moffitt v. Massachusetts Dept. of Revenue, 2013 WL 5441984 (Bankr. W.D. Ky. 2013) – Debtor’s failure to timely file returns for years 2003, 2004 or 2005 until August, 2008, did not satisfy obligation to file tax returns, rendering debts non-dischargeable. • Moffitt v. U.S., 2013 WL 3294898 (Bankr. W.D. Ky. 2013) – Section 523(a)(1)(B)(i) makes a tax debt non-dischargeable if a return is not filed. Tax return not filed prior to due date was not a “return” for purposes of Section 523(a)(1).

  45. Lien Avoidance In re Pees, 2013 WL 3808153 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 2013) – Debtor can avoid judicial lien were value of property is less than value of unavoidable liens plus exemptions. Debtor permitted to avoid entire lien after claiming asset exempt to extent of $1.00 using wild card exemption.

  46. Discrimination • In re Mead, 2013 WL 64758 (Bankr. E.D.N.C. 2013) – IRS discriminated against debtor when IRS refused to abide by pre-petition Offer in Compromise • Ellis v. Dep’t of Homeland Security, 2013 WL 3480259 (Bankr. D. Colo. 2013) – Department of Homeland Security did not violate Section 525 by denying renewal of security clearance based on “bad debt” criteria.

  47. Social Security • Drummond v. Welsh, 711 F.3d 1120 (9th Cir. 2013) – Chapter 13 debtor’s calculation of repayment plan that excludes social security income is not lack of good faith.

  48. In re Holls, Case no. 13-46765 (Bankr. E.D. Mi. 2013) – Debtor’s failure to include SSI in calculating the plan payment was a lack of good faith. • In re Wise, Case no. 13-44673 (Bankr. E.D. Mi. 2013) – Debtor’s failure to commit social security for funding of plan constituted lack of good faith.

  49. Disposable Income • In re Maura, 2013 WL 1730040 (Bankr. E.D. Mi. 2013) – Debtors cannot deduct on means test payments on retirement loans or voluntary contributions to retirement accounts. • In re Rogers, Case No. 12-32558 (Bankr. E.D. Mi. 2012) – Debtors cannot exclude post-petition voluntary retirement contributions in calculating disposable income.

  50. In re Hargis, 2013 WL 4514090 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 2013) – Section 1325(b) requirement for payment of disposable income is not applicable to a post-confirmation plan modification.

More Related