Study Objectives and Questions for Observational Comparative Effectiveness Research

1. Study Objectives and Questions for Observational Comparative Effectiveness Research Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) www.ahrq.gov

2. Outline of Material This presentation will: • Characterize the primary uses and users of the scientific evidence that will be generated by the study (stakeholders) and how the evidence may be used • Articulate the main study objectives in terms of a highly specific research question or set of related questions that the study will answer • Synthesize the literature and characterize the known effects of the exposures and interventions on patient outcomes • Provide a conceptual framework • Delineate study limitations that stakeholders and investigators are willing to accept a priori • Describe the meaningful magnitude of change in the outcomes of interest as defined by stakeholders

3. Introduction • A study’s objectives and questions form the foundation for research protocols. • All aspects of study design and analysis are based on objectives and questions stated in the protocol. • Stakeholders are individuals or organizations that use scientific evidence for decisionmaking and, therefore, have an interest in the results of new research. • Involvement of stakeholders in formulating the research question facilitates appropriate translation of the results.

4. Identify Decisions, Decisionmakers, Actions,and Context • Clearly articulate decisions or actions for which stakeholders seek new scientific evidence • State purpose and time frame of the study • Describe context in which the decision will be made or actions will be taken • Describe how evidence will be generated • Clarify the number of analyses that will be necessary to generate evidence

5. Synthesize Current Knowledge Base • Relevant questions to assess the current knowledge base for developing an observational comparative effectiveness research protocol: • What are the most relevant studies and guidelines about the interventions, and why are these studies relevant to the protocol (e.g., because of the study findings, time period conducted, populations studied, etc.)? • Are there differences in recommendations from clinical guidelines that would indicate clinical equipoise? • What else is known about the expected effects of the interventions based on current understanding of the pathophysiology of the targeted condition? • What do clinical experts say about gaps in current knowledge?

6. Conceptualize the Research Problem • Collaborate with stakeholders to determine major objectives • Describe potential relationships between intervention and important health outcomes • Enumerate all major assumptions that affect the conceptualization of the research problem • Apply scientific theory in designing the study protocol and developing the analytic plan • Develop a conceptual model or framework to guide implementation of the study

7. Determine the Stage of Knowledge Development • Stage research in a way that allows for interim decisions and sequentially more rigorous studies • Below is a potential categorization for the stage of knowledge development. • Descriptive analysis • Hypothesis generation • Feasibility studies/proof of concept • Hypothesis supporting • Hypothesis testing

8. Defining and Refining Study Questions Using the PICOTS Framework Based on a conceptual model, define study questions using PICOTS: • Population: What is the patient population of interest? What subgroups will be considered in terms of age, sex, ethnicity, et cetera? • Intervention: What are the interventions of interest (drug, device, procedure, or test)? • Comparator: What are the alternatives? What is the gold standard? What is usual care? How does usual care vary? Are decisionmakers interested in superiority or noninferiority? • Outcomes: What are the outcomes of interest? • Timing: What is the time frame of interest for assessing outcomes? Are decisionmakers interested in short-term or long-term outcomes? • Setting: What is the clinical setting of interest?

9. Discuss the Evidentiary Need and Uncertainty • The following are suggested questions to discuss with stakeholders to help elicit the amount of uncertainty that is acceptable to them. • What level of new scientific evidence is needed by the decisionmaker to make a decision or to take action? • What quality of evidence is needed for the decisionmaker to act? • What level of certainty of the outcome is needed by the decisionmaker(s)? • How specific does the evidence need to be? • Will decisions require the consensus of multiple parties?

10. Specify Magnitude of Effect • Discuss the magnitude of effect stakeholders believe represents a meaningful difference between treatment options a priori. • How do patients and other stakeholders define a meaningful difference between interventions? • How do previous studies and reviews define a meaningful difference? • Are patients and other stakeholders interested in superiority or noninferiority as it relates to decisionmaking?

11. Conclusion • Study objectives and questions form the basis for observational comparative effectiveness research studies. • Establishing a study objective framework can help conceptualize the research problem and the design of a study. • Implementing the framework involves collaboration between investigators and stakeholders. • Challenges include difficulty identifying, engaging, or managing all interested stakeholders.

12. Summary Checklist (1 of 2)

13. Summary Checklist (2 of 2)