1 / 34

Using CEM Data in Practice: F eedback from CEM Secondary Assessments

Peter Hendry: CEM Consultant. Using CEM Data in Practice: F eedback from CEM Secondary Assessments. Glasgow Conference 13 th Feb 2013. Peter.Hendry@cem.dur.ac.uk Secondary@cem.dur.ac.uk. Assessment for Excellence: 2 systems. S1/S2 Baseline Assessment (MidYIS):

hubert
Télécharger la présentation

Using CEM Data in Practice: F eedback from CEM Secondary Assessments

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Peter Hendry: CEM Consultant Using CEM Data in Practice:Feedback from CEM Secondary Assessments Glasgow Conference 13th Feb 2013 Peter.Hendry@cem.dur.ac.uk Secondary@cem.dur.ac.uk

  2. Assessment for Excellence: 2 systems • S1/S2 Baseline Assessment (MidYIS): • A Test of Developed Ability at start of S1 or S2 • 4 sections: Vocabulary, Maths, Non-Verbal and Skills (Proof Reading, and Perceptual speed and accuracy • Computer adaptive* or paper-based • Any time Term 1 + catch ups • Value Added measures to SOSCA and to Scottish Qualifications • S2 Curriculum-based Assessments (SOSCA): • A curriculum assessment of knowledge, skills and understandingat end of S2 • Assesses what has been taught in the classroom • Covers, Maths, Science, Reading (English) • Computer adaptive* • Four week assessment windowmid April to mid May + catch ups • Value Added measures from PIPs, InCAS and MidYIS and to Scottish Qualifications

  3. AfE: key elements • School and students’ test performances are compared to a nationally representative sample • Assessment data from the tests provides school and pupil datato inform teaching and learning • ‘Predictive’ data indicates futurepotential performanceto SQ, and will to National 4 and 5, to inform target setting and subsequent monitoring • ‘Value-added data’ provides measures of relative performanceat SQ (and will for National 4 and 5) and SOSCA from earlier baselines to inform self-evaluation

  4. AfE Feedback: MidYIS and SOSCA Assessment Feedback: • Standardised score system: 50-150, mean 100, SD 15 • School data including component averages and band profiles (historical and current) • Pupil data in the form of spreadsheets and Individual Pupil Records (IPRs)

  5. AfE Feedback: MidYIS and SOSCA ‘Predictions’ Feedback: • Currently to S2 SOSCA from S1/S2 baseline (MidYIS) and to SQ from MidYIS and SOSCA ‘Value-Added’ Feedback: • To SQ from curriculum baseline (SOSCA), and from S1/S2 baseline (MidYIS) • To S2 curriculum assessment (SOSCA) from P7 baseline (PIPS or InCAS) and/or S1/S2 baseline (MidYIS)

  6. www.cemcentre.org

  7. Detailed Information about the assessment. Well worth a look. Data for your school.

  8. Bands, percentiles, standardised scores… 30 5 20 90 1 40 10 80 70 99 60 95 50 25% 25% C B 25% 25% A D Standardised scores Percentiles: 98 Mean 100, Standard Deviation of 15

  9. SCHOOL A: S1 baseline data

  10. SCHOOL A: S1 baseline data Intake profiles: overall and test component bands A school with a ‘completely average’ intake would have 25% of pupils within each band.

  11. SCHOOL A: S1 Baseline

  12. SCHOOL A

  13. SCHOOL A: S2 curriculum (SOSCA) data

  14. School no.1 School no.2

  15. STANINES

  16. S1 baseline IPR

  17. S2 curriculum (SOSCA) IPR

  18. S2 curriculum (SOSCA) IPR

  19. Predictions Feedback • Currently available to Standard Grade from AfE baselines • In the future to National 4 & 5 Qualifications from AfE baselines • Also to AfE S2 curriculum (SOSCA) from S1 and/or S2 baseline (MidYIS) • Includes Chances Graphs

  20. How is a ‘prediction’ generated? 50% on or above the trend line 1 Trend line (regression line) *********************** 2 ******************************* 3 ******************************************* ‘PREDICTION’ (expected grade) 4 ************************************* GRADE GRADE ************************************** ******************************** ***************************** 50% on or below the trend line ***************** BASELINE SCORE

  21. Data for 2012 examinations Grade

  22. Predictions: Chances Graphs 50% chance of a grade 2 – the most likely single grade. 50% chance of a different grade Point Prediction =1.8 Grade Prediction = 2 Chances Graphs based on Pupil’s SOSCA Test Score

  23. Not a label for life...just another piece of information • The Chances graphs show that, from almost any baseline score, students come up with almost any grade - - -there are just different probabilities for each grade depending on the baseline score. • In working with students these graphs are more useful than a single predicted or target grade • Chances graphs show what can be achieved: • By students of similar ability • By students with lower baseline scores

  24. Latest information as at 13 Feb 2102 • Replacing SG with Nat 4 & 5 predictions: CEM statisticians have put together a proposal. • This has been looked at by colleagues in Scottish Authorities. • The CEM Technical team have now published the new predictive data. • This data is now available on the CEM secondary+ website alongside the existing SG predictive data

  25. New slide!!

  26. . Measuring Value-Added – Terminology Exam grade -ve VA +ve VA 0 2 4 6 8 BASELINE SCORE Raw Residual Trend Line/Regression Line

  27. SCHOOL A: S2 curriculum (SOSCA) data

  28. SCHOOL C: AfE data

  29. Standardised Residual Bar Chart SCHOOL C: AfE data 99.7% confidence limit 95% confidence limit ANY VALUE IN THE INNER SHADED AREA SHOWS THE EXPECTED RESULTS i.e. AVERAGE VALUE ADDED

  30. SCHOOL C: SQ data

More Related