1 / 17

Counterplans

Counterplans. PICs….. In spaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaace !. What every CP needs. Cp text Net benefit Must be competitive Uniquely beneficial Mutually exclusive. Cp text. Write before the round Grammar does it accomplish what I need the CP to accomplish? How could the aff permute the cp text?

hugh
Télécharger la présentation

Counterplans

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Counterplans PICs….. In spaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaace!

  2. What every CP needs • Cp text • Net benefit • Must be competitive • Uniquely beneficial • Mutually exclusive

  3. Cp text • Write before the round • Grammar • does it accomplish what I need the CP to accomplish? • How could the aff permute the cp text? • How could the aff create a solvency deficit?

  4. Net benefit • Internal net benefit • Independent disad • Case turns the cp avoids

  5. CP competitiveness • The CP by itself must be better than the plan or any combination of the plan and all or part of the CP • Uniquely beneficial -CP must do something good or avoid something bad that the plan can’t. • Mutually exclusive -the aff and the cp can not happen at the same time

  6. permutation • Tests competition of the CP • must have plan first, unaltered in content and timeframe • Many variations on permutations • Even if the perm works, the cp can still function if it is uniquely beneficial (perm still links to politics)

  7. Counterplan status • Conditionality • Dispositionality • unconditionality

  8. conditionality • Can kick the cp whenever you want • Still have to answer theory • Aff can still try to leverage offense • Very common • Strategic flexibility • Conditionality is okay, multiple contradictory conditional worlds is problematic

  9. dispositionality • Can kick the cp unless it is straight turned • Only impact turns, link turns, or theory • Conceding permutations, link or impact defense will make the CP go away • Not much strategic value • Difficult to run with other worlds

  10. unconditionality • Will go for in the 2NR • Can’t kick under any circumstances • Good to run 1 off • Everything in 1NR should work together

  11. Types of counterplan • PIC • Consult • Condition • Advantage • Agent • This list is not exhaustive

  12. PIC • Plan Inclusive Counterplan • Does part of the plan • Removes part of the action or replaces a word • Word PICs • Generally accepted as legitimate

  13. condtion • Conditions plan action on an additional prior act • “USFG will do X if PRC will do Y” • Theoretically questionable • Strategically sound since it should suck up the affs offense

  14. advantage • Does an alternative action that seeks to solve one of the advantages of the plan • Puts offense on advantages not solved by the cp • Valuable for affs with 2 or 3 advantages

  15. agent • Is also a PIC • Does the plan through an alternative agent(XO, Courts) • Plan action is a good idea, just need to use different actor • Politics is a common NB • agent powers or legitimacy can also be NB

  16. consult • Consults another actor on the plan action • Often has relations NB • Theoretically shady, lots of judges hate it • Strategically strong since it literally does all of the aff

  17. Answering the cp • Permutation • Solvency deficit • Add-ons • Theory • Disads to the cp • Turning the NB

More Related