1 / 36

House hunting by honey bees a study of group decision making

House hunting by honey bees a study of group decision making. Thomas D. Seeley Department of Neurobiology and Behavior Cornell University. Individual Inputs. Aggregation Process. Group Action. The question of social choice:

hume
Télécharger la présentation

House hunting by honey bees a study of group decision making

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. House hunting by honey beesa study of group decision making Thomas D. Seeley Department of Neurobiology and Behavior Cornell University

  2. Individual Inputs Aggregation Process Group Action The question of social choice: How can a group use the knowledge and opinions possessed by its members to produce an optimal choice of action for the group as a whole? Group decision making

  3. A Swarm of Bees • One queen bee • ~ 10,000 worker bees • 3-5% are active (300-500 scout bees) • 95-97% are quiescent

  4. Home Sweet Home

  5. Pioneering discovery by Martin Lindauer:scout bees report potential home sites with waggle dances (1955) Martin Lindauer Karl von Frisch

  6. Coding location information in waggle dance 1. Angle of waggle run indicates direction. 2. Duration of waggle run indicates distance.

  7. Lindauer’skey findings • Initially, bees perform dances for multiple sites • Before swarm flies away, all dances indicate one site • The swarm flies to the consensus site, moves in • Therefore, dances on swarm indicate nest sites • Scouts are holding a kind of plebiscite on the swarm’s new home Lindauer (1955) Z. vergl. Physiol. 37:263-324.

  8. The real estate preferences of bees (1975) (“>” means “is preferred to”) • Entrance height: 5 > 1 m • Entrance area: 15 > 75 sq cm • Entrance direction: south > north • Entrance position: bottom > top • Cavity volume: 40 > 10 liters • Combs: with > without

  9. How exactly do the scout bees conduct their group decision making? How does social choice (democracy) work in a honey bee swarm?

  10. Detailed eavesdropping on the scout bees’ “debate” on a swarm

  11. One 16-hour “debate”: 11 sites, 149 scouts Seeley& Buhrman (1999) Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 45:19-31.

  12. Decision-making process:consensus building or quorum sensing? Dancer consensus Scout quorum at swarm? at site? What is the decision evidence? Where is it accumulating?

  13. Laboratory for experiments withhouse hunting bees:Appledore Island, Maine (Shoals Marine Laboratory, Cornell University)

  14. Testing the hypothesis of quorum sensing Critical prediction: Delaying quorum formation at the chosen site, while leaving the rest of the decision-making process undisturbed, should delay the reaching of a decision.

  15. Experimental methods Each swarm conducted its decision-making process twice, once with 1 nest box, and once with 5 nest boxes (or vice-versa).

  16. 1 nest-box trials vs. 5 nest-box trials 14:00 15:00 16:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 • Slower buildup of scouts at each nest box • No decrease in dancing at swarm • Marked delay in time to decision! (on average, 3.3 vs 7.4 hours, P < 0.005) Seeley & Visscher (2004) Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 56:594-601.

  17. Conclusions • Decision evidence: number of scouts at each site • Making a decision: accumulating a threshold number (quorum) of bees at a site • How bees sense the quorum remains a mystery

  18. Decision making by accumulation of evidence Monkey brain Bee swarm Selected nest box quorum Nonselectednest box

  19. When quorum is reached, scout bees produce an acoustical signal (“worker piping”)to stimulate non-scouts to warm up for flight Seeley & Tautz (2001) J. Comp. Physiol. A 187:667-676.

  20. Piping/warming takes 30-60+ minutes Seeley, Kleinhenz, Bujok &Tautz (2003) Naturwissenschaften 90:256-260. Why quorum sensing, not consensus sensing? Warm up starts as soon as enough scouts (not all scouts) have approved of a site: boost speed, maintain accuracy

  21. Does a swarm choose the best of the various sites that it examines?

  22. Variable quality nest site

  23. Results (note: winner takes all) Scouts visible at nest box Time of day Seeley & Buhrman (2001) Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 49:41416-427.

  24. What are the behavioral processes of the individual scout bees that underlie the rapid buildup of scouts at superior sites, and the eventual decline of scouts at the inferior ones?

  25. “Friendly competition” among coalitions of committed scouts for the uncommitted scouts So-so site Superb site Site 1 bees r1 Uncommitted Scout bees r2 Site 2 bees a1 a2 N1 U N2 For each site i: dNi/dt = NiriU - Niai Bees need this: r1 > r2and a1 < a2

  26. Tuning of dance duration as a function of site quality Seeley & Buhrman (2001) Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 49:41416-427.

  27. A bee makes multiple visits to her site, but dances less and less strongly after each visit (phasic, not tonic, coding of site quality) Seeley (2003) Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 53:417-424.

  28. Decay function for scout’s nest-site dances 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Remaining returns to swarm with dancing Seeley (2003) Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 53:417-424.

  29. Why the scout buildup is strongest at the best site Superb site 90+75+60+45+30+15 = 315 waggle runs • Scouts for the best site have the highest per capita recruitment (“birth”) rate and the lowest per capita abandonment (“death”) rate. • Population of scouts for the best site grows most rapidly, and ultimately overwhelms, all populations for other sites. So-so site 30+15 = 45 waggle runs 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Remaining returns to swarm with dancing

  30. Dynamics on swarm cluster and at nest sites that underlie swarm decision making Seeley, Visscher & Passino (2006) Amer. Scientist 94:220-229.

  31. Good decision making by groups is not automatic “The mass never comes up to the standard of its best member, but on the contrary degrades itself to a level with the lowest.” —Henry David Thoreau, Journal, 14 March 1838 “Madness is the exception in individuals but the rule in groups.” —Friedrich Nietzsche, Beyond good and evil, 1886

  32. Swarm Smarts! Promote diversity of knowledge within the group –scouts search autonomously and report freely Avoid tendency to conformity, rapid consensus –scouts conduct an open competition among opinions –scouts assess and report sites independently Aggregate opinions with both speed and accuracy –scouts use quorum sensing,with moderate quorums

  33. Swarm Smarts! Promote diversity of knowledge within the group –scouts search autonomously and report freely Avoid tendency to conformity, rapid consensus –scouts conduct an open competition among opinions –scouts assess and report sites independently Aggregate opinions with both speed and accuracy –scouts use quorum sensing,with moderate quorums

  34. Collaborators Brigitte Bujok (Würzburg) Susannah Buhrman (Cornell) Marco Kleinhenz (Würzburg) Roger A. Morse (Cornell) Kevin Passino (Ohio State) Jürgen Tautz (Würzburg) Kirk Visscher (UC-Riverside) Field Assistants Siobhan Cully Robert Fathke Benjamin Land Adrian Reich Ethan Wolfson-Seeley Funding National Science Foundation National Geographic Society U.S. Dept. of Agriculture Inspiration Martin Lindauer (Würzburg)

More Related