1 / 14

Monitoring of Energy Audits in Finland Bottom-up since 1994

Bottom-up Measurement and Verification of Energy Efficiency Improvements: National & Regional Examples. Monitoring of Energy Audits in Finland Bottom-up since 1994 Heikki Väisänen Ulla Suomi Ministry of Trade and Industry Motiva Oy.

hyacinth-everett
Télécharger la présentation

Monitoring of Energy Audits in Finland Bottom-up since 1994

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Bottom-up Measurement and Verification of Energy Efficiency Improvements: National & Regional Examples Monitoring of Energy Audits in Finland Bottom-up since 1994 Heikki Väisänen Ulla Suomi Ministry of Trade and Industry Motiva Oy European Parliament 3 March 2005

  2. 4,1 TWh/a (4,8 TWh/a 2003) 0,5 TWh/a The Finnish Three Instrument Package Monitoring boundaries VA Coverage Public sector: ~ 58 % of building vol. Private service & gov. bldg: ~ 25 % of building vol. Industry: ~ 85 % of total energy use EA Coverage Municipalities ~ 50 % of building vol. Private services ~ 25 % of building vol. Industry: ~ 70 % of electricity ~ 60 % of heat and fuels Voluntary agreements 1997-> Energy Audits 1992-> Subsidies 1992 EAs 1998 EEIs 1,5 TWh/a Total effect approx. 5,0 TWh in 2002 (not 6,1)

  3. Energy Audit Programme Main figures by the end of 2004 • Total over 6200 buildings covered by the EA Programme • Public sector: ~ 3600 buildings ~ 60 million m3 • Private sector: ~ 1600 buildings ~ 65 million m3 • Industry: ~ 1000 sites ~ electricity 31 TWh/a • ~ heat and fuels 70 TWh/a • Total audit costs (1992-2004) • 41 M€, subsidy 19 M€ • 4 M€/a, subsidy 1,7 M€/a (approx. level last 3…4 years) • EA database - MOTICOP (since 1994) • ~5000 statistically valid energy audit reports (31 building types) • 33 000 energy saving measures (30 categories) • 350 000 – 400 000 individual figures • Average 110 subsidy applications/year • Average 400 energy audit reports/year

  4. I Monitoring Process of Energy Audits Energy Audit Clients Subsidy applications Energy Audit reports Follow-up via questionnaire 1995 1996 1999 15 Regional EEDCentres Motiva Follow-up via Voluntary Agreement reporting 2000… I II VA~EA Clients VA Database EA Database III

  5. TABLE 2 SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSED MEASURES MEASURE TOTAL ROI INVEST- CO2 ENERGY SAVING WATER SAVING STATUS SAVING MENT reduction HEAT ELECTRICITY OF energy costs energy costs water costs IMPLEMEN- energy power energy power TATION €/a a € t/a MWh/a €/a €/a MWh/a €/a €/a m³/a €/a 1 Description of measure 0 0,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DONE 2 Description of measure 0 0,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DECIDED 3 Description of measure 0 0,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . . Normally approx. 4…10 measures/audit . TOTAL 0 0,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 The 3-Phase Data Collection Process • 1. Subsidy Application Document – filed manually • Basic data: applicant (sector/branch) and the building (type, volume) or site (energy consumptions) • Energy audit model applied, audit cost and subsidy, named energy auditors • 2. Energy Audit Report – filed via an Excel-file • Basic data checked and updated • TABLE 1 “Energy & water consumptions” and TABLE 2 “Proposed measures” • 3. Follow-up – transferred from VA database • Implementation status of the proposed measures (TABLE 2) CONS. NO

  6. I Not only to get the figure ”1 TWh/a” Data verification ”automatic alarm” Data input process 5…7 months/a Quality Control of EA Reports 6…10 months/a • Ministries • Media • Clients • Auditors • Motiva • EU EA Database 1½ months/a Specific Analysis Annual Report on Energy Audits • 33.000 measures • 30 categories • 31 building types 1½ months/a ”1 TWh/a” 2 days work Data verification and correction continuos process

  7. Cumulative subsidy granted for energy audits and cumulative audit costs during the period 1992-2004

  8. Energy audit volumes in the service sector during the period 1992-2004 14 Municipalities Private sector 12,2 12 11,4 10,2 10 8 7,3 Building volume million m3 6,6 6,3 6,2 6 5,2 5,0 4,8 4,7 4,5 4,2 4,1 3,5 4 3,4 3,2 3,1 3,0 2,9 2,8 2,5 2,2 2,1 2 1,2 0,7 0 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004

  9. Total consumptions, energy costs, saving potentials and investments in the public sector 1998-2003 Present consumption MUNICIPAL SECTOR Savings potential 1998-2003 923 buildings Heat 765 425 MWh/a 97 191 MWh/a 12,7 % 23 230 718 €/a 2 836 359 €/a 12,2 % Electricity 317 890 MWh/a 22 436 MWh/a 7,1 % 18 020 155 €/a 1 658 763 €/a 9,2 % Water 2 718 666 3 195 431 3 7,2 % m /a m /a 5 817 833 €/a 429 636 €/a 7,4 % Total consumptions Total savings Investments 47 068 706 €/a 4 924 758 €/a 10,5 % 7 354 105 €

  10. The profitability of the proposed saving measures in the service sector energy audits 1998-2003 (tot. 11,1 milj. €)

  11. The profitability of the proposed saving measures in the industry and energy sector energy audits 1998-2003

  12. Proposed energy saving measures in energy audits during the period 1992–2003 Category of measure Measures Savings Invest. ROI pcs. 1000 EUR 1000 EUR a 3,4 1 Heating system 284 1 006 3 438 1.1 Heat production, district heating basic rates 900 2 119 2 553 1,2 1,7 1.2 Reduction of indoor temperature 1 617 1 480 2 479 3,9 1.3 Controls of the heating system 1 525 1 815 7 001 4,2 1.4 Tightness of the building envelope 171 268 1 123 2,0 1.5 Technical system insulations 200 284 581 2,5 Total of system 4 697 6 972 17 175 3,6 2 Ventilation system 446 1 781 6 415 0,4 2.1 Running hours 3 956 9 852 3 999 1,5 2.2 Reduction of air flows 682 1 911 2 795 2,7 2.3 Separation of service areas 122 369 980 1,2 2.4 Controls of the ventilation system 1 853 2 367 2 934 3,9 2.5 Heat-recovery 1 259 6 486 25 033 0,7 2.6 Night cooling ventilation 84 49 35 1,8 Total of system 8 402 22 814 42 192 1,7 3 Domestic water, Total of system 3 470 3 017 5 011 4 Electricity, Total of system 9 885 13 883 20 257 1,5 2,6 5 Cooling systems, Total of system 460 3 221 8 466 3,6 6 Construction, Total of system 484 957 3 465 1,7 7 51 226 395 Compressed air system, Total of system 2,7 8 Other energy saving measures 1 310 26 788 72 747 All proposed energy saving measures 28 759 77 879 169 708 2,2

  13. Different Levels of Monitoring Verified savings Level VI – Confirms the savings (a legal commitment fulfilled) Measured savings at site level Level V - Know how much is saved (measurement error) 1995 Theoretical savings of implemented measures Level IV - Know how much approx. will be saved 1994 Saving Potentials based on proposed measures Level III - Understand how much could be saved 1993 Level II - Know where the money is spent Energy Audit Volumes 1992 Level I – Just follow the money spent Expenditure (e.g. subsidies for EAs)

  14. ,,, some comments • On-site “field” conditions are far from laboratory conditions • we need to be realistic, what can be measured and what not • Small savings cannot be identified from the total consumption • sometimes not worth while measuring at all – just adjust the set point • The end-user might not be interested to spend money on M&V • who will pay for the M&V • What is actually Bottom-up monitoring… and what not?

More Related