1 / 10

Regional IPM Centers Survey A Summary

Regional IPM Centers Survey A Summary. Adapted from a presentation by Carol Pilcher Department of Entomology Iowa State University. Response Rate. 135 individuals 97 individuals responded to survey 71.8% response rate.

hyatt-whitaker
Télécharger la présentation

Regional IPM Centers Survey A Summary

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Regional IPM Centers SurveyA Summary Adapted from a presentation by Carol Pilcher Department of Entomology Iowa State University

  2. Response Rate • 135 individuals • 97 individuals responded to survey • 71.8% response rate

  3. National Level Analyses Table 1. Frequencies of Stakeholder Response to Centers’ Objectives

  4. National Level AnalysesMeans and Standard Deviations of Stakeholder Response to Centers’ Objectives 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neutral, 4 = agree, 5 = strongly agree

  5. Table 2. Frequencies of Northeastern Region Stakeholder Response to Centers’ Objectives

  6. Means and Standard Deviations of Stakeholder Response (by Region) to Centers’ Objectives 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neutral, 4 = agree, 5 = strongly agree

  7. Are there any activities, programs, approaches or practices that the Regional IPM Centers should consider implementing?

  8. Areas of Focus (integrate these areas into the Center Programs) • Organic pest management into program • Non-agricultural issues • Invasive species • Conference/Workshop • One major regional conference with major theme • Cross Regional Efforts • Work on issues that bridge regional boundaries • Demonstration Projects • Greater use of “demonstration” projects

  9. Evaluation/Measuring Impacts • Greater emphasis on environmental, health and economic impacts • Performance measures • Leadership • Center take more active approach to driving IPM policy and adoption • Center take lead role in national IPM decision support system • Outreach • Work closely to engage more stakeholders

  10. Outreach/Marketing • IPM Centers need to do a better job of marketing themselves as a good source of IPM information • Brief reports to concisely summarize goals of program, research results of grant funding, progress towards goals, etc. • Support State Contact/State Coordinator • Fully fund one position per state to conduct activities of state contact (crop profiles, PMSP activities, etc.)

More Related