1 / 1

H. Lee*, Y.-J. Kim, H.-K. Lee * hlee@kistep.re.kr [R&D Budget Strategy Division

H. Lee*, Y.-J. Kim, H.-K. Lee * hlee@kistep.re.kr [R&D Budget Strategy Division. Objective: Estimating Government R&D Program Efficiencies as a part of our assistants to the Government R&D Budget Compilation Process Programs are units, comprising the Government R&D budget

ianthe
Télécharger la présentation

H. Lee*, Y.-J. Kim, H.-K. Lee * hlee@kistep.re.kr [R&D Budget Strategy Division

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. H. Lee*, Y.-J. Kim, H.-K. Lee *hlee@kistep.re.kr [R&D Budget Strategy Division • Objective: Estimating Government R&D Program Efficiencies as a part of our assistants to the Government R&D Budget Compilation Process • Programs are units, comprising the Government R&D budget • Korean Government adopted Digital Budget & Accounting System, Top-down Budgeting, Performance Based Budgeting several years ago. • Measuring Program Efficiency assists the budgeting process . • - Efficiency is used in Program Performance Evaluation • - Yr n-1 Performance of a Program affects its Budget Size in Year n+1 in the Top-down budget process. • Our Challenges prior to Measuring Program Efficiency (PE) • 1/3 of R&D Programs get In-depth Performance Evaluation per annum • Strategy : Tracking project performances and aggregating these statistics by program • Program budgeting for Yr n+1 with performance information from Yr n-1 while programs end, merge, regroup, and are reorganized • Strategy: Human Labor to match projects of Yr n-1 to appropriate programs in Yr n+1 • Collect Project Statistics and Obtain Proper Input & Output Measures by Program, and Assign Appropriate Categories for each Program • Strategy: Use Experts to Validate these statistics • Computing Efficiencies and Finding Efficient Programs/Program Types • Used Input Oriented BCC Model (Banker et al, 1984) • Tobit Regression Analysis to find Factors(Program Types) of efficiency Statistical Challenges in Analyzing Government R&D Project Data for the Effective Budget Compilation bipolar: many low PE while many PE close to 1./Note we did not use bimodal • Performance based Budgeting : Allocation of funds to achieve programmatic goals and objectives as well as some indication or measurement of work, efficiency, and/or effectiveness • Links between performance information & budget allocation • Measures: Inputs, Outputs, Effectiveness, Efficiency, Workloads • Efficiency = Output/Input Results from Tobit Regression Analysis is that Programs comprised of bottom-up projects are more efficient than those of top-down projects individual projects are more efficient than those of group projects & Preplanning shows more efficient than Programs without preplanning. • Statistical Challenges : • Data Matching & Classification & Statistical Inferences • Challenge 1: matching projects in Yr 2008-2010 to a program with budget request in Yr 2012 • Challenge 2: obtaining coherent statistics from this matching • Challenge 3: classifying programs into various categories based on project information and program plans • Strategy: Experts reduce errors in measuring inputs/outputs for more accurate efficiency measures • Challenge 4: measuring efficiency with multiple inputs and outputs • Strategy: Data Envelop Analysis (DEA) has been employed (Farrell, 1957; Banker et al, 1984) • Challenge 5: incorporating statistical and systematical uncertainties • - survey data have various uncertainties • - inference on groups of efficiency measures based on different types of outputs, results in different error structures/distributions • (basic research does not produce patents and royalties). • On going workto tackle this statistical challenge Use of Efficiency Measure and Tobit Regression Analysis in Budget Process [We can suggest] […] officers in charge of R&D programs efficient program planning and budgeting strategies […] officers in NSTC and MoSF increase/reduce the budget size of relatively efficient/inefficient R&D programs in the budget allocation and compilation process (A Program with good performance gets budget increment whereas one with poor performance gets deduction) […] program planning schemes and adjust the program budget size accordingly as a part of policy analysis. […] the midterm R&D budget projection as a part of settling new budget systems • Brief R&D Budget Process for FY 2012 • [Ministries submit] proposals on their priorities in R&D (Oct. 31, 2010) • […] midterm R&D program plans with estimated budget (Jan. 31, 2012) • Ministry gets R&D budget ceiling by the midterm plans (Apr. 30, 2012) • […] detail budget requests by program (Jun. 30, 2012). • Budget (Re)Allocation by NSTC (Jul. 31, 2012) • NSTC finalizes the R&D budget deliberation (Sept. 15, 2012) • MoSF submits the budget deliberation to the National Assembly (Oct. 2, 2012) • We (KISTEP) make contributions to these yellow steps 1.1 tr. won ~ $1 mil • Shortcomings of DEA from the statistical inference perspective : • Statistical Uncertainties are not take into account. • Curse of Dimensionality: the more input/output measures, the more DMUs have efficiency 1. • Efficiency measures are results of a Nonparametric Method, valued between 0 and 1, difficult to link regression analysis methods, assuming some distributional properties (In quest of adopting nonparametric regression analysis schemes while using the efficiency measures as response). • On Data Envelop Analysis(DEA) to measure Program Efficiency: • Program Input: Expenditure in 2008-10 • - only coherent input measure across R&D programs • Program Outputs by the Program Type • - Basic Research(BR): No. of well received Papers (R2nIF ≥ 1.0) [=Papers] • - Fundamental Research(FR): No. of Registered Patents [=Patents] & Papers • - Applied and Development Research(ADR) : Patents, Tech Transfer Fees, Royalties, and Sales Increases • - SME R&D aids(SME): Same as ADR outputs • These Programs are Decision Making Units (DMUs) for DEA. • KISTEP currently survey and analyze all Gov. funded R&D projects including their performances during 2011. • Projects are funded through appropriate Programs during each fiscal yr. • Scientific Papers and Patents are the examples of project outputs • By aggregating these outputs and inputs, project performance statistics are analyzed at KISTEP • These statistics are not fully used for program budgeting • References: written in Korean are omitted • Banker, Charnes & Cooper (1984) Management Science vol.30(9) pp. 1078 – • Farrell (1957) with discussions. J. of Royal Statistical Society A vol. 120 pp.11- • Shah & Shen (2007) “A Primer on Performance Budgeting,” World Bank This work was supported by the Korean Ministry of Strategy and Finance(MoSF)

More Related