1 / 12

Prioritizing Tiered Support to Schools 2012-2013

Marie Izquierdo & Pablo G. Ortiz. Prioritizing Tiered Support to Schools 2012-2013. Prioritizing Tiered Support to Schools 2012-2013. 26 s chools defined as “persistently low- achieving” by the requirements of the School Improvement Grant; supported by the Education Transformation Office.

idalee
Télécharger la présentation

Prioritizing Tiered Support to Schools 2012-2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Marie Izquierdo & Pablo G. Ortiz Prioritizing Tiered Support to Schools2012-2013

  2. Prioritizing Tiered Support to Schools2012-2013 26 schools defined as “persistently low- achieving” by the requirements of the School Improvement Grant; supported by the Education Transformation Office SIG Schools 40 schools that have historically been vulnerable schools; supported by the Education Transformation Office Non-SIG Schools within ETO assigned to ETO Office “A”, “B”, and “C” schools that have demonstrated consistent improvement; supported generally by the district through region offices All Other Designations

  3. Evolution of:The Education Transformation Office 2010-11 • 19schools selected as “persistently lowest-achieving” 6 elementary schools; 3 middle schools; 10 high schools. 14 million dollars for each of the next three years through School Improvement Grant (SIG) 2011-12 • Expanded to 26 schools in year two. Added 3 elementary and 4 middle schools. Additional 6 million dollars. 2012-13 • Expanded to 66 schools in year three. Added 27 elementary, 11 middle and 2 senior high schools for a total of 36 elementary, 18 middle and 12 senior high schools.

  4. Aligned and Structured Support • Education Transformation Office • SIG Schools • Persistently Low-Achieving schools receive additional funding from School Improvement Grant • 10 high schools • 7 middle schools • 9 elementary schools • Non-SIG Schools • 40 schools that have historically been vulnerable schools receive additional funding through District Title I • 2 high schools • 11 middle schools • 27 elementary schools

  5. Criteria for Placement in ETO • SIG Schools • 26 schools • Schools identified by the state as being in the “Lowest 100 Performing Elementary Schools” • 10 Schools • Schools that received a “D” or “F” grade in 2012 • 28 Schools • Schools that received a “C” grade in 2012 but would have received a “D” if not held harmless by the state • 4 Schools • Fragile “C” Schools that earned a “D” in at least one of the three previous years • 18 Schools • Vulnerable schools that would have dropped 2 letter grades but were held harmless for 2012-2013 • 7 Schools

  6. 4 Pillars of Support Improve Teacher Quality Develop Instructional Leaders STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT Strengthen Parent & Community Involvement Expand Wraparound Services for Students

  7. Improve Teacher Quality • Innovative Instructional Resources and Strategies • Differentiated Instruction • Gradual Release • Instructional Frameworks • Job-Embedded Professional Development with Problem-Solving Focus • Common Planning • Lesson Study • iCADS • Aligned Support • Coaching Academy • Teacher Academy • Mathematics, Reading, and Science Instructional Coaches • Each school will be allocated at least: • 1 reading coach • 1 math coach • 1 science coach • Recruit/Retain High Performing Educators • Recruitment Fairs • Teach for America • University Partnerships

  8. Develop Instructional Leaders • Assign administrators to departments and grade levels • Include assistant principals in all instructional coaches’ training to build instructional capacity and ensure alignment and iCADs • Create network of APs and Principals • Implement internship process for future principals and assistant principals through Project Lead Strong and Florida Turnaround Leadership Program • Conduct instructional rounds with principals and focus on best practices and instructional rigor

  9. Expand days/times for parent-teacher conferences • Expansion of PTA enrollment • ETO Task Force • Visibility • Focus on Parent Academy classes • Executive PASS: CEO and Principal Partnership • Creation of four parent advocacy centers Strengthen Parent & Community Involvement

  10. Expand Wraparound Services for Students • Mentoring and Outreach Programs • City Year • Big Brothers/Big Sisters • Diplomas Now • Communities in Schools • Positive Behavior Support (PBS) • Positive Reinforcement • Appropriate Social Behaviors • Improve School Climate and Student Behavior • Enrichment Opportunities • Dual-Enrollment • Advanced Academics • CTE • IB Programs • College Summit • Academic Interventions • City Year • Saturday Academy • Spring Break Academy • Before/After-School Tutoring

  11. Prioritizing Tiered Support to Schools2012-2013 26 schools defined as “persistently low- achieving” by the requirements of the School Improvement Grant; supported by the Education Transformation Office SIG Schools • Develop district pacing guides to ensure instructional coherence and consistency across schools • Provide ongoing communication and support to core content area department heads • Provide information and support to region superintendents and their schools as new End of Course exams come on-line (i.e. Civics, U.S. History) • Use Florida Continuous Improvement Model process to review data and identify Target and Focus schools • Provide additional support to ETO schools as needed • Serve as lead on the transition to full Common Core State Standards (CCSS) implementation 40 schools that have historically been vulnerable schools; supported by the Education Transformation Office Non-SIG Schools within ETO assigned to ETO Office “A”, “B”, and “C” schools that have demonstrated consistent improvement; supported generally by the district through region offices All Other Designations

  12. STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT

More Related