1 / 84

Module 5 Water Treatment On completion of this module you should be able to:

Module 5 Water Treatment On completion of this module you should be able to:. Be aware of the objectives of water treatment Have an appreciation of the location, layout of a plant Describe the processes involved in water treatment Discuss the types of separation processes

ifama
Télécharger la présentation

Module 5 Water Treatment On completion of this module you should be able to:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Module 5 Water TreatmentOn completion of this module you should be able to: • Be aware of the objectives of water treatment • Have an appreciation of the location, layout of a plant • Describe the processes involved in water treatment • Discuss the types of separation processes • Design a simple sedimentation tank Module 5

  2. Basic Methods for Correcting Water Quality Deficiencies • The processes and extent of required treatment are dependent on the nature and degree of quality deficiencies to be corrected. • There is virtually no water that cannot be treated to potable standards. Cost effectiveness is one of the guiding principles • The basic methods are physical and chemical processes and to a lesser extent, biological Module 5

  3. Water Treatment matrix Module 5

  4. Module 5

  5. Plant Layout and Headloss Through the Plant • Planning and environmental constraints • Selected source • Plant design factors • Site factors • Environmental factors • Unit processes should lie on the system gravity hydraulic grade line Module 5

  6. Preliminary TreatmentDepending on the source, the following unit processes are likely • Intake screens • Aeration • Preliminary settling tanks • Pre-chlorination and algal control Module 5

  7. Intake screen Module 5

  8. Aeration • Increase dissolved oxygen in ‘stale’ water • Remove or reduce dissolved CO2 and other gases • Precipitate out dissolved ferrous and manganese compounds • Reduce volatile impurities and odour • Various methods of aeration e.g. spray, cascade, tray and diffused air Module 5

  9. Preliminary settling tank Module 5

  10. Chemical treatment through coagulation • Coagulants are chemicals that react with colloidal matter to form absorbent bulky precipitates (flocs) • Destabilisation of colloidal particles (10-3 - 1 m), hydrophilic or hydrophobic in nature • Salts of aluminium and iron form insoluble hydroxides • Reaction is pH dependent (6 - 7 optimum range) Module 5

  11. Aluminium salts are commonly used • Aluminium sulfate; sodium aluminate • Natural or added alkalinity is required • Al2(SO4)3 + 3Ca(HCO3)2 2Al(OH)3 + 3CaSO4 + 6CO2 • Reaction is sensitive to pH • May revert to soluble for if pH increases/decreases • Some recent concerns relating to health issues Module 5

  12. Aluminium sulfate In the absence of alkalinity • Al2(SO4)3 + 6H2O 2Al(OH)3 + 3H2SO4 • H2SO4 + Ca(OH)2 CaSO4 + 2H2O • Al2(SO4)3 + 3Ca(HCO3)2 2Al(OH)3 + 3CaSO4 + 6CO2 Natural alkalinity Module 5

  13. Iron salts are more difficult to control • Ferric chloride/iron(III) chloride; ferric sulfate • 2FeCl3 + 3Ca(HCO3)2 2Fe(OH)3 + 3CaCl2 + 6CO2 • Natural or added alkalinity is required • Wider operating pH range • Cheaper material and forms heavier floc • Iron salts cake and are dirty to handle, difficult sludge to dispose Module 5

  14. Coagulant aids • They assist difficult coagulant processes and result in dramatic improvement with increased floc formation and faster settling • Polyelectrolytes of organic synthetic high molecular weight material with electrical charges • Clays, lime, soda ash and activated silica are other examples of coagulant aids Module 5

  15. Optimum coagulant dosage • Use of laboratory jar test • Determine least cost of chemicals that remove turbidity, colour in an shortest possible time • Comparison of first floc appearance, floc size, dosage and settling time • Optimum dosage also tested against pH Module 5

  16. Optimum coagulant dosage using the jar test Module 5

  17. Flash/Rapid MixingTo cause rapid dispersion at minimum power input • Use of various devices e.g. bends, baffles, can result in energy losses • Energy for good mixing requires 3 - 15 kW.s/m3 • 30 - 60 sec detention time at maximum flow • Rate of chemical diffusion is quantified by the shear velocity gradient, G = [P/(V)]0.5 Module 5

  18. Flash/Rapid Mixing (cont) • G = 500 - 600 s-1 at 30 - 60 s residence time • Mechanical power for head loss, P = Q  g h watt • Head loss from hydraulic mixing varies 0.15 - 0.5 m • Excessive G values can be harmful • Increased contact time of 120 s or more achieve little Module 5

  19. Flash/Rapid Mixer Module 5

  20. FlocculationGentle stirring following rapid mixing so that floc particles can coalesce and agglomerate • Two phases are involved; initial perikinetic, orthokinetic > 1 m • Shear velocity gradient, G = 20 - 75 s-1 • Detention time, t = 20 - 60 minutes • Camp No, G t of (12 to 270) x 103 • Mechanical flocculation power input • Tapered flocculation using high G values and progressively lower as floc size increase Module 5

  21. Relationship between Shear Gradient and time, t Module 5

  22. A Mechanical Flocculator Module 5

  23. SedimentationRemoval of suspended particles in an aqueous medium through gravity settling • Class I Unhindered settling of discrete particles • Class II Settling of dilute suspension of flocculent particles • Class III Hindered settling and zone settling • Class IV Compressive settling (compaction) Module 5

  24. Class I settlingFor discrete particles settling freely, the terminal velocity is reached when gravitational force is balanced by frictional drag force • vs = gd2 (1 - )/(18 ) • As particle size increases, vs increases • As CD increases vs decreases • CD varies inversely as NR Module 5

  25. Module 5

  26. Class I settling (cont) • Detention time, t = Volume/Q • Depth of tank is not relevant, vs = Q/surface area • Performance is influenced by overflow rate and detention time • High water temperature decreases CD and thus increases vs Module 5

  27. Drag coefficient Module 5

  28. Shallow depth sedimentation • Proposed as early as 1904 with initial failure • Obvious inherent advantages • Tube clarifiers with high surface loading rates achieve 9 m/h • Plated tanks in zig-zag pattern, vh = 44 m/h, HRT of 22 min • Lamella separator with vs = 20 m/h Module 5

  29. Tube clarifier at Mt Kynoch settling tank Module 5

  30. Shallow depth sedimentation Plate settler tank Module 5

  31. Shallow depth sedimentation Lamella separator tank Module 5

  32. Difficult settling operation conditions • Excessive suspended solids • High colloidal content • Coincidence of peak demand and high turbidity • Low coefficient of fineness < 1 • Low temperature, overturn • Persistent wind condition • Streaming caused by density currents, temperature gradients Module 5

  33. Settlement in horizontal flow tanks • Overflow rates varies from 18 to 54 m/d • Typically 28 m/d for a 3.5 m depth and 3 h HRT • In tropical countries with more turbid water, 18 m/d with 4 h HRT is appropriate with depths of 3 - 3.5 m • In practice, particles are not wholly discrete and there is merit in depth • As a preliminary guide use HRT x (TSS/900)0.5 h to adjust for varying TSS in water Module 5

  34. A typical horizontal flow sedimentation tank Module 5

  35. Settlement in upward flow tanks • Area of tank to ensure vs > v = Q/A • In practice, vs 2 v • vs = 3 m/h for well formed floc • = 6 - 10 m/h with coagulant aids • = 8 m/h in water softening plants • Types: hopper bottomed sludge blanket square tanks, solid contact clarifiers, pulsator Module 5

  36. Vertical flow tank Module 5

  37. Pulsator Module 5

  38. Solids contact clarifier Module 5

  39. FlotationAn effective means of removal of particles of density less than the liquid medium • Use of air bubbles to separate solids/particulates from a liquid phase • Air bubbles (20 - 100 m) generated by dissolved air flotation, diffused air flotation and vacuum filtration • Attachment of solids to bubbles in a 3 phase system; size of flocs less important • Solids separation through a floating scum and removed by a skimmer Module 5

  40. Flotation (cont) • Advantage of high surface loading rates 5 - 12 m/h, and the ability to remove oils, grease and algae • Short HRT of 40 - 80 minutes; bubbles rise at 1 - 1.5 mm/s • Flotation units are smaller in size than normal clarifiers • Saving in chemical costs • Optimum amount of air is determined from pilot studies • Disadvantage of additional equipment cost, high operating cost and energy use Module 5

  41. Dissolved Air Flotation (DAF) Module 5

  42. Dissolved Air Flotation (DAF) Dissolved air flotation Module 5

  43. FiltrationA process of passing water through a sand bed or other suitable medium at low speed to remove suspended solids • Removal of non-settleable flocs after coagulation and sedimentation • Properties of the medium (effective size, hardness etc) • More than a mechanism of straining Module 5

  44. Mechanisms of filtration • Straining • Sedimentation • Interception • Adhesion • Flocculation • Adsorption Module 5

  45. Rapid sand filterA process of depth filtration as solids are removed within the granular medium • Sand bed 0.6 - 0.75 m deep of 0.4 - 0.7 mm effective size and a uniformity coefficient  1.7 • Supporting gravel layer 0.3 - 0.5 m (graded 2 - 60 mm) • Underdrain system to collect filtered water and to discharge air scour and backwash water uniformly • Filtration rate varies from 4 - 15 m/h Module 5

  46. Rapid sand filter (cont) • Backwash when head loss  2 m • Application of backwash water assumes practical importance in the design of filters • Some problems associated with rapid sand filters are mud balls, air-binding, surface cracks and shrinkage • Other forms are direct filtration, and up-flow filtration Module 5

  47. clogs up readily ideal but unattainable Arrangement of filter media Module 5

  48. Typical rapid sand filter Module 5

  49. Rapid sand filter isometric view (Droste 1997, p. 418) Module 5

  50. Types of filter underdrain system (McGhee, 1991, p.212) Module 5

More Related