1 / 15

Impact of Orthotics on the Knee

Impact of Orthotics on the Knee. Sara Mrowzinski. http://www.wmgh.net/article/foot-orthotics-72.asp. Introduction. Many people think of orthotics based on the off-the-shelf brands and do not realize how the orthotic works. What is an Orthotic?. Prevents abnormal movement

ilario
Télécharger la présentation

Impact of Orthotics on the Knee

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Impact of Orthotics on the Knee Sara Mrowzinski http://www.wmgh.net/article/foot-orthotics-72.asp

  2. Introduction • Many people think of orthotics based on the off-the-shelf brands and do not realize how the orthotic works

  3. What is an Orthotic? • Prevents abnormal movement • Various conditions can be relieved • Back, hip, knee, and ankle pain • Increase stability in joints • Increase biomechanical efficiency Right leg posterior view http://www.wellfeet.com/orthoticswork.htm

  4. The Knee • Anatomically designed to flex and extend in the sagital plane (hinge joint) • Abnormal alignment at the foot can alter the forces when standing, walking, running, etc. to a transverse component

  5. Pronation • 70% have over-pronation • Low arches • Effects travel up http://healthyfeetforlife.com/

  6. Components Example: 150 lb person standing with the foot 20⁰ over-pronated Vertical Component: cos 20⁰ = (v / 150) v = 140.95 lb Transverse Component: sin 20⁰ = (t / 150) t = 51.3 lb

  7. Correction • Force directed at the ankle into the posted orthotic http://www.orthoticsandal.com/AboutOS_Technology.html

  8. Correction http://www.wellfeet.com/orthoticswork.htm http://www.trcc.com/au/solution/orthotics.html

  9. “Effect of Inverted Orthoses on Lower-Extremity Mechanics in Runners” • Authors: • Dorsey S. Williams III • Irene McClay Davis • Stephen P. Baitch • Journal: • Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

  10. Methods • 11 runners participated • All previously wore standard orthotics • Inversion orthotics posted at 15⁰ or 25⁰ • 3-D gait analysis • Joint motion • Joint kinetics • Ran at 3.35 m/s

  11. Results • Results • Eversion moment not present before • Peak inversion moment significantly decreased • Increase in peak knee adduction • Other factors • Takes 5⁰ of change in post in order to have 1⁰ change effect

  12. Results Continued

  13. Example • Corrected with 54% improvement 20⁰ x .54 = 10.8⁰ cos 10.8⁰ = (vc / 150) vc = 147.34 lb Sin 10.8⁰ = (tc / 150) tc = 28.11 lb (28.11-51.3) x 100% = 45% decrease 51.3

  14. Discussion • Impact of Padding • Decreases the force due to the compression of the padding • Orthotics have various amounts of padding depending on the person’s needs • At the ankle • Muscles affect stability • Rear foot movement and stress on the lateral knee needs to be studied more

  15. Conclusions • These results suggest that an inversion orthotic may be more suitable than a standard orthotic for those with excess pronation http://www.syracuseorthotics.com/

More Related