1 / 9

Beyond enlargement: The EU’s “new neighbours”

Beyond enlargement: The EU’s “new neighbours”. Ben Slay Director, UNDP Regional Centre Bratislava UNECE Executive Forum: Competing in a Changing Europe 11 May 2004, Geneva. Key challenges after 1 May. For EU-25: Internal governance reforms Lisbon “knowledge society” agenda

ileanac
Télécharger la présentation

Beyond enlargement: The EU’s “new neighbours”

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Beyond enlargement: The EU’s “new neighbours” Ben Slay Director, UNDP Regional Centre Bratislava UNECE Executive Forum: Competing in a Changing Europe 11 May 2004, Geneva

  2. Key challenges after 1 May • For EU-25: • Internal governance reforms • Lisbon “knowledge society” agenda • For new EU states: • EMU accession • Easy for Baltic states, not so for Central Europe • Absorption of structural, cohesion funds • For both: Trans-border “new neighbour” issues in Western CIS, Balkans

  3. Who are the EU’s “new neighbours”? • EU “hopefuls” in SEE: • Countries now negotiating for accession: Romania, Bulgaria, Croatia • Preferential access to EU markets: these countries plus Turkey, Western Balkans • Western CIS: Russian Federation, Ukraine, Moldova, Belarus • No “date for a date” • No preferential access to EU markets

  4. How do they compare?

  5. How competitive are these economies? • Potentially: very competitive • GDP growth exceeds EU averages • Particularly in Western CIS countries • Low unit labour costs • Locational, logistical advantages • Key: preferential access to EU markets • SEE countries have it, CIS countries don’t

  6. Result: Different patterns of integration • South East Europe: • 60-80% of SEE trade with EU-25 • Since 2000 SEE has attracted significant FDI from EU-focused multinationals • Repeat of Central European experience? FDI-led restructuring of manufacturing, energy, finance • Western CIS: • Russian Federation is largest export market, source of FDI (smaller levels) • EU markets very important for Russia, but largely for energy exports

  7. It’s also about cross-border issues . . . • Migration: • Legal (labour force growth) • Illegal (trafficking) • HIV/AIDS, TB • HIV prevalence rates much higher in Western CIS than new EU members • Environment/international waters • Tisa River basin • Baltic Sea • Organised crime

  8. . . . And about governance • State sector—Good governance means: • Decentralisation, to empower regions, municipalities, communities • Public administration reform, to modernise state structures, make them market friendly • Tax reform, to broaden tax bases, reduce grey economy, promote MSMEs • Private sector—Good governance means: • Corporate governance reforms, to improve investment climate • Public-private partnerships (e.g., IT sector)

  9. Conclusion: New challenges for EU-25 • Will “Schengen curtain” bring new barriers to free movement of goods, services, people? • Will “European anchor” move eastward? • Challenges for EU-25: • Reduce de facto trade discrimination against Western CIS countries • Don’t close EU’s eastern border to labour flows from “new neighbours” • Challenges for “new neighbours”: • More reform • Better governance

More Related