1 / 29

PEANUT meeting summary @ Fermilab

PEANUT meeting summary @ Fermilab. Giovanni and Komatsu 23/Jan./2007. Agenda. 1. NuMI - MINOS Short summary of NuMI-MINOS status ... Gina 2. PEANUT summary Situation of PEANUT analysis ... Komatsu European Scanning System(ESS) ... Giovanni

illiana-bentley
Télécharger la présentation

PEANUT meeting summary @ Fermilab

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PEANUT meeting summary@ Fermilab Giovanni and Komatsu 23/Jan./2007

  2. Agenda 1. NuMI - MINOS Short summary of NuMI-MINOS status ... Gina 2. PEANUT summary Situation of PEANUT analysis ... Komatsu European Scanning System(ESS) ... Giovanni SUTS status ... Komatsu 3. SFT based analysis PoT of PEANUT ... Gina Scanback result of BL040 ... Fukuda Time stumping for Emulsion tracks ... Nonoyama Activity in Naples ... Giovanni Summary of European lab analysis ... Giovanni 4. Non-bias analysis Full area scanning in Naples ... Giovanni SUTS scanning of BL118 ... Morishima NetScan for BL118 ... Komatsu 5. Discussion for paper 6. New exposure NuMI-MINERvA plan and schedule ... Vittorio Exposure plan Gina reported about PoT of NuMI She will provide PoT corresponds to PEANUT exposure period. Giovanni and Komatsu made a review of Scanning system we have. Two main analysis scheme is reported, One is SFT based analysis and the other is general scan. Then we discussed work sharing between US side and Japan and Europe side.

  3. PEANUT period

  4. Situation of PEANUT analysis • Before last December, works in each lab was not synchronized. • We re-form PEANUT analysis working group to work for physics output. • Regular meeting (video link) is scheduled. • We decided to do PEANUT analysis in OPERA frame work at least for all labs. • CS(PL2 and 2) scanning • Scanback • First phase : SFT matching required • Second phase : All CS tracks • Non-bias analysis, apart from OPERA

  5. Scanning status in Europe Giovanni De Lellis University of Naples

  6. Conclusion • 17 bricks under analysis in Europe (about 1000 events expected) • Emulsion to SFT alignment performed for the majority of them • The scan-back has been performed in a few bricks only • Different criteria have been used: SFT triggers, SFT-emulsion matching and volume around the stopping point to be scanned (skewed, how many, etc..) • Unification of all the cuts is ongoing: trigger conditions, SFT matching criteria and volume scanning standardized • After a quick revision of the analysis, it will be possible to merge all the data

  7. Time stamping for Emulsion Tracks with Gyaku Data Base method 070122 Y.Nonoyama

  8. y x x y 2 3 Residual of Emulsion track to hits ofdirectory below plane • This showed residual. • extension emulsion track to • below SFT plane. • Select tracks matching with SFT trigger as Rock Muon type by eyes. mm mm mm mm If matching is real, its residual will be into 500mm.

  9. PL 43 I.P. 1.5mm

  10. summary • Now looking for good separation parameter. • One is below SFT plane hits. • This selection power is very good. • Bud SFT link efficiency is effected by SFT efficiency. • So, other selection parameter will be needed for efficiency.

  11. Reconstruction of neutrino interactions in PEANUT in general scanning (unbiased) mode Giovanni De Lellis on behalf of Andrea Russo Naples University

  12. Scanning areas All 57 plates have been general scanned: 38 plates have been general scanned: 5.55 x 4.30 cm^2 = 23.9cm^2 11.1 x 4.30 cm^2 = 47.8 cm^2 General scanning mode Measured density of aligned base-tracks: 4 base-track / mm2 (transportation order) 0.7 base-track / mm2 (assembly order)

  13. Beam tracksat least 4 segments in the plots shown Density of aligned base-tracks~0.7 / mm2 NuMI beam peak (x, y) ~ (-50,0) mrad Tracking efficiency MIP particles: <Grain number> ~ 24

  14. Expected number of events in the brick Neutrino interaction rate in an iron target exposed to NuMI in the near hall (2 * 105) / (year * ton) This value (increased by 8%) accounts for the lead target 43 ± 7 neutrino interactions expected in the analyzed volume Nmes/etotal = 44 ± 9 neutrino interactions estimated from the 24 observed events after efficiency correction

  15. Conclusions • A volume of 413 cm3 (58% of the brick volume) was general scanned in one PEANUT brick • Detailed single brick Monte Carlo simulation of PEANUT used to define a procedure to identify neutrino interactions • 24 neutrino interactions with SFT matching have been identified in the volume • After the efficiency correction, we estimate (44 ± 9) neutrino interactions happening in the volume • Good agreement with the number of expected events (43 ± 7) computed from the flux • 8 events with larger multiplicity found without any match with the SFT (6 with 3 tracks, 1 with 4 and 1 with 9 tracks)

  16. NetScan for BL118 PEANUT meeting @ Fermilab 22-23/Jan/2007

  17. Possibility of non-bias analysis • Naples already did full scanning for one brick. • Giovanni’s report • Pilot analysis of BL118 NetScan is started. • 5x5 25cm2 area is scanned by SUTS • Today I report first 21 plate data. • We used base track for NetScan framework • For the first attempt. • How much we can reduce scanning power is next subject.

  18. Nagoya->Fermilab Fermilab->Nagoya Pulse Height distribution

  19. Nagoya->Fermilab Fermilab->Nagoya Efficiency as a function of slope

  20. Alignment in exposure 66394 f001.001 100730 f002.001 335458 f003.001 232095 f004.001 286247 f005.001 404625 f006.001 314017 f007.001 172725 f008.001 110706 f009.001 100512 f010.001 85604 f011.001 106800 f012.001 116955 f013.001 137667 f014.001 119846 f015.001 142189 f016.001 127642 f017.001 135839 f018.001 141562 f019.001 126336 f020.001 166530 f021.001 3530479 total • Virtual erasing is applied • 3,530,479 base track remains for 21 plate. • Right table shows number of base tracks for each plate. • Still large amount of junk base track is there. • ECFSAL • 139,777 track (nseg>=2) are reconstructed. • 128,015(2seg), 8,294 track (3seg) • 3,468 track (nseg>=4) • Too large amount of nseg<=3 • To reduce junk track, I applied 30mrad angular much for nseg<=3 tracks • Reduced to 37,125(2seg), 1,475(3seg)

  21. 4 segment or more track

  22. Eff. As a function of slope Eff. As a function of plate

  23. Preliminary vertex hunting 11 6 0 -56561.9 76531.2 -20969.1 151 5941653 9 141 7118239 5 1.8 -7.2 -46.6 -1149.9 7.03 0.1931 141 7070732 7 151 5941653 9 -7.1 -12.1 27.9 -1075.3 12.83 0.1179 151 5941653 9 151 5981499 7 -3.2 4.7 -26.7 -1129.9 0.98 0.2085 141 7070732 7 151 5981482 6 1.7 -7.2 -0.2 -1103.5 13.39 0.2461 151 5941653 9 151 5981482 6 -2.2 5.6 -32.9 -1136.2 1.99 0.1440 151 5981482 6 151 5981499 7 -1.9 4.5 -6.6 -1109.9 0.05 0.0767 141 7118239 5 151 5981482 6 -1.0 -5.3 53.4 -1049.9 8.63 0.0695 151 5979255 6 151 5981499 7 -5.0 2.3 -4.3 -1107.6 7.78 0.4589 151 5979255 6 151 5981482 6 -4.7 1.7 -2.2 -1105.5 7.52 0.4606 151 5941653 9 151 5979255 6 -7.2 1.4 -4.3 -1107.5 3.24 0.5722 141 7070732 7 141 7118239 5 4.5 -14.9 -35.0 -2370.3 8.35 0.3018 151 5941653 9 9 6 0 -56719.7 76458.9 -19865.9 -0.1384 -0.0688 -1103.2 6.01 0.0056 141 7118239 5 8 7 0 -56435.4 76458.8 -18633.8 0.0521 -0.0259 -2335.4 15.32 0.0052 141 7070732 7 8 7 0 -57120.7 76205.2 -18633.8 -0.2309 -0.1333 -2335.4 23.83 0.0036 151 5981499 7 7 6 2 -56485.4 76495.1 -19865.9 0.0633 -0.0351 -1103.2 6.57 0.0065 151 5981482 6 7 6 2 -56555.2 76446.0 -19865.9 0.0066 -0.0814 -1103.2 4.56 0.0056 151 5979255 6 7 3 8 -56189.2 76008.7 -19865.9 0.3437 -0.4720 -1103.2 7.64 0.0010 3 3 0 -68817.8 47444.7 -22457.2 161 5359881 14 151 2935076 4 1.9 -3.9 2.5 -1388.3 4.33 0.2893 161 5359426 7 151 2935076 4 2.2 -9.6 -25.2 -1416.0 14.66 0.0634 161 5359881 14 161 5359426 7 -0.4 0.7 -10.7 -1401.6 0.21 0.2969 161 5359881 14 16 5 0 -68562.0 47525.6 -21066.4 0.1840 0.0556 -1390.8 3.70 0.0005 151 2935076 4 4 6 11 -69042.4 47305.5 -19865.9 -0.0876 -0.0519 -2591.3 5.53 0.0008 161 5359426 7 10 5 6 -68908.7 47288.0 -21066.4 -0.0652 -0.1134 -1390.8 0.44 0.0010 • ECVTXA is used for preliminary vertex hunting. • Another 23 two track vertex IP<20 is exist. • Local alignment is not done.

  24. Summary • Apart from OPERA, NetScan is good method to perform non-bias neutrino interaction analysis. • Especially for electron neutrino location. • NetScan with SUTS is feasible. • But, currently noise track density is bit too high to do clean analysis.SUTS scanning should be well tuned. • Also, cut applied for base track is too tight.Should be revised.

  25. Discussion for paper • We agree on two types of output • SFT track based scanback. • General scan to detect electron neutrino flux. • US provide PoT and SFT-MINOS matching information soon. • Komatsu (Luca) provide list of SFT 3D tracks. Already sub-sample matching has done in year ago. • One target date to make summary is mid April (MINOS-meeting is scheduled)

  26. Location of MINERvA

  27. Schedule of various MINERnA detectors… Neutrino Beam Simulations, Measurements Detector Simulation Calibration DB “Real” DAQ Core Reconstruction Software Slow Controls, Monitoring (From December 2006 Minerna collaboration meeting)

  28. Possibility of new exposure • There is interference between PEANUT and MINERvA. • MINERvA installation will start on end of 2007 • Summer shutdown is foreseen in June or July. • PEANUT detector should move to somewhere before MINERvA installation start. • Komatsu propose possible configuration for new exposure with lighter brick (not OPERA brick). • T952 second run needs some paper works to be approved.

More Related