1 / 24

Outbreak investigation report

Outbreak investigation report. Agnes Hajdu EpiTrain III, 25.08.2006 Jurmala, Latvia. Based on EPIET material. Steps of an outbreak investigation. Confirm outbreak diagnosis Define a case Identify cases and obtain information Descriptive data collection and analysis Develop hypothesis

illias
Télécharger la présentation

Outbreak investigation report

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Outbreak investigation report Agnes Hajdu EpiTrain III, 25.08.2006 Jurmala, Latvia Based on EPIET material

  2. Steps of an outbreak investigation • Confirm outbreak diagnosis • Define a case • Identify cases and obtain information • Descriptive data collection and analysis • Develop hypothesis • Analytical studies to test hypothesis • Communication – Outbreak report Control measures

  3. First: What are they? Why write them? Who writes them? Who reads them? Then: Structure Frequent problems Confidentiality Legal issues Outbreak reports

  4. What are outbreak reports? • Formal outbreak reports • Preliminary, interim, final report • Reports to colleagues • national bulletin, Eurosurveillance, conference/ seminars • (Inter)national outbreak reporting systems • Journal publications

  5. Why write them? • To document the outbreak • Present investigation methods, control measures • Potential legal issue • To verify recommendations • To enhance quality of investigations In order to prevent future outbreaks and assist in investigation&control of similar incidents

  6. Who writes them? • ”The outbreak control team” (OCT) • Named authors • Each participating agency must agree with what is said • Who ”owns” the report?

  7. Who reads them? • All agencies represented on the OCT • Policy making bodies • Professional colleagues • The public • The lawyers

  8. Structure of the report • Summary • Introduction and Background • Outbreak description • Methods • Results • Discussion • Lessons learned • Recommendations • References • Appendices

  9. 1. Summary • Key • Features, setting of the outbreak: Who – What – Where – When? • Lessons learned • Recommendations • Ongoing action • Further action required

  10. 2. Introduction and Background • Population demographics • Surveillance data • Previous similar outbreaks • Description of the are/site/facility • e.g. Healthcare system • e.g. Industries involved • Any unusal point

  11. 3. Outbreak description • ”The initial story” • How was the outbreak reported? • Steps taken to confirm it? • What was known to date? • Why was an investigation undertaken? • Management of the outbreak • OCT members, objectives, assistance, control measures • Media relations

  12. 4. Methods • Epidemiological • Case definition, case finding, study design (descriptive-analytical) • Laboratory • Clinical and environmental specimens (types, how they were collected) • Environmental studies • Site visit and risk assessment, traceback • Other studies

  13. 5. Results • Epidemiological • Number of responses and participation rate • Number of cases • Overall attack rates and by age, sex, exposure • Symptoms, duration and outcomes of illness • Description (time, place, person) • Epidemic curve (incubation period) • Laboratory findings • Environmental study findings • Inspection report • Other studies

  14. 6. Discussion • Main hypotheses (likely causative agent and mode of transmission) • Justify conclusions and actions • Clear interpretation of results • Explain how results confirmed/disproved hypothesis • Limitations, possible biases • Explain action to protect public health • Highlight any problems

  15. 7. Lessons learned • Lessons for participating agencies • Problems encountered • Mistakes made • Suggestions for improvement • Lessons that may be useful for others • Key points from internal/external audit

  16. 8. Recommendations • What should be done • To control this outbreak • To prevent future outbreaks • To improve management of future outbreaks Be specific: to whom? Be realistic: feasible actions

  17. 9. References Vancouver referencing system http://www.soton.ac.uk/library/subjects/references/vancouver.html

  18. Chronology of events General background OCT (members, terms of reference) Detailed results Maps Epidemiological questionnaire Letters to patients/physicians Press releases Costs of the outbreak Acknowledgements 10. Appendices

  19. Problems • Confidentiality • What should not be included? • Legal issues • Delay in writing the report • Not writing the report at all..

  20. Confidentiality • To individual patients • To commercial businesses • Details may remain in meeting minutes • Media disclosure • Legal disclosure

  21. Legal issues • Who ”owns” the report / the data? • Prosecuting agencies may deem the information to be confidential but… … health authorities have a duty to provide the public with information

  22. Report published • Jan. 1997: outbreak report on MMWR: • Legionaire’s disease (LD) associated with whirlpool spa on display, USA • Febr. 1999: major outbreak LD, Holland • Source: whirlpool spa on display • Lawsuit against government: failure to act on available knowledge (MMWR)

  23. Conclusion • Duty to • document the outbreak • inform the colleagues • prevent and control future outbreaks • Good report = half publication • Write article, case study

  24. Some reports stay alive John Snow, 1843, Broad Street Pump Outbreak - Cholera

More Related