160 likes | 168 Vues
Evolution of Global Economic Governance. Global Economic Relations: A Historical Perspective. Rise of Modern State & IPE The Treaty of Westphalia (1648) Marking the end of the 30-year war (between the victorious Protestant countries in N Europe & the defeated Catholic Hapsburg countries)
E N D
Global Economic Relations:A Historical Perspective • Rise of Modern State & IPE • The Treaty of Westphalia (1648) • Marking the end of the 30-year war (between the victorious Protestant countries in N Europe & the defeated Catholic Hapsburg countries) • Marking states’ recognition of each other’s sovereignty & territorial integrity • Establishing the supremacy of national government over political & religious matters within its territory. • Mercantilism & mercantilist states (1500-1750) • Mercantilists believed: • power & wealth are legitimate goals of the state. • Wealth could be used to enhance a state’s tangible power through arms buildup
Global Economic Relations:A Historical Perspective • Rise of Modern State & IPE • Mercantilism & mercantilist states (1500-1750) • Mercantilists believed: • wealth could also be used by a state to increase its intangible or soft power such as influence. • States should adopt policy to preclude the rise of competitors by restricting: • imports • export of technology to potential rivals • raw material export to potential rivals.
Global Economic Relations:A Historical Perspective Rise of Modern State & IPE • Evaluating the Mercantilist Thinking • Mercantilists & mercantilist states saw international trade as a “zero-sum” game benefiting one party at the expense of another. • Mercantilist policies were criticized as “beggar-thy-neighbor” policies by Adam Smith. • Mercantilism contributed to the rise of a strong state authority and territorial unification through its emphasis on national power. Thus, the fortification of the states as equal and independent actors of the international system.
Global Economic Relations:A Historical Perspective Rise of Modern State & IPE • Industrial Revolution & Rise of Free Trade • Britain rising as the pre-dominant economic power between 1780s and 1830s • By 1860, it represented 37% of European industrial production capacity, 20% of world industrial production, and 80% of world new technology industries • Britain was in search of more markets globally and raw materials for its expanding production • Britain championing free trade • Removal of most trade restrictions by 1830s • Abolition of its Corn Laws & lifting of agricultural import restrictions in 1846
Global Economic Relations:A Historical Perspective Rise of Modern State & IPE • Industrial Revolution & Rise of Free Trade • Britain championing free trade • Signing of the Cobden-Chevalier Treaty between Britain & France leading to the mushrooming of other inter-state commercial treaties pulling down trade barriers throughout the European continent. • The Interwar Years & British Decline • British Decline • Drop of British share in world trade (24% in 1870 to 14.1% in 19130 • Rise of German & US share in world trade (12.2% & 11.1%) • US emergence as the biggest economy in 1913, making up 32% of world industrial ouput • WWI ushered in the shift of financial preeminence from London to New York
Global Economic Relations:A Historical Perspective Rise of Modern State & IPE • The Interwar Years & British Decline • British Decline • US reluctance to back free trade in post-war years • Imposition of import restrictions on European goods • Raising of customs duties via the Fordney-McCumber Act (1922) • Raising of tariffs via the Smoot-Hawley Act (1930) • The Bretton Woods System • Creation: 1944, 44 nations • Objective: creation of an int’l economic system that would • prevent another economic & political collapse & another military conflict • Neutralize the force of economic nationalism • Foster a high-level of economic interactions.
Global Economic Relations:A Historical Perspective Rise of Modern State & IPE • The Bretton Woods System • Creation: • Objective: • Role of US: officially taking the leadership position in the creation of a liberal economic order • IMF • for monitoring a system of fixed or pegged exchange rates • to prevent competitive devaluation of one’s own currency that could trigger trade wars • Provide short-term loans to help states handle balance-of-payments deficits so that the fixed exchange rates can be kept
Global Economic Relations:A Historical Perspective Rise of Modern State & IPE • The Bretton Woods System • The World Bank (IBRD) • Created to provide long-term loans for post-war reconstruction and development in LDCs. • The General Agreement on Trade & Tariffs (GATT) • For lowering tariffs in multinational negotiations • Establishing rules for international trade • Forming procedures for settling trade disputes. The Bretton Woods institutions were aimed at neutralizing economic nationalism and trade protectionism.
Global Economic Relations:A Historical Perspective Contemporary Economic Institutions • The North & Institutions • The North countries dominate world economic system • They provide most of the funding to IMF & World Bank loans and, as a result, • They have the most votes • USA, Japan, Germany, France & Britain • WTO has a one-nation one-vote system, yet it is dominated by the major trading powers • They set agendas in negotiations • They occupy leadership positions in these institutions.
Global Economic Relations:A Historical Perspective Contemporary Economic Institutions • The North & Institutions • The North uses the institutions to • Propagate a liberal economic approach • Reinforce the North’s dominance from sole American leadership to collective leadership (from Group of Five to Group of Seven, etc.) • The OECD (Org for eco coop & dev) • A Paris-based organization with mostly industrialized countries as its members • Created in 1961 • Enlarged in the early 1990s to admit some developing nations • Designed to liberalize int’l transactions such as trade & capital flow
Global Economic Relations:A Historical Perspective Contemporary Economic Institutions • The North & Institutions • The OECD • Designed as a forum for discussing economic policies, common problems & coordinating actions • Designed as a mechanism for applying peer pressure on each other for meeting their commitments • Designed as a way to minimize conflicts in economic relations
Global Economic Relations:A Historical Perspective Contemporary Economic Institutions • The North & Institutions • The G-8 • Originally G-5 • Organized in the 1970s & superseded by G-7 in 1986 • Russia joined in 1991, thus G-8 • Russia involved in political matters rather than economic issues • Including the most powerful DCs in the global economy • Members working together flexibly & without formal constitutions • Delegations often headed by head of state or government • No members from the developing world
Global Economic Relations:A Historical Perspective Contemporary Economic Institutions • The South & Institutions • Measuring development in the South • Per capita GDP or per capita income • A country’s national income converted into US dollars using the official exchange rates divided by its population • Problem: miss the differences in the purchasing power of US dollars and local currency • Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) • The number of units of a country’s currency required to buy the same amount of goods & services in the domestic market as a US dollar would buy in the US
Global Economic Relations:A Historical Perspective Contemporary Economic Institutions • The South & Institutions • Measuring development in the South • Human Development Index (HDI) • UNDP publication since 1990 • HDI focuses on three dimensions: • Life expectancy • Adult literacy rate & school enrollments • Standards of living measured by PPP-adjusted per capita GDPs • Problems with HDI • Does not reflect the effects of rapid socio-econ & political change • Does not measure political aspects of human rights such as freedom of speech & voting rights • Does not show inequality within a country
Global Economic Relations:A Historical Perspective Contemporary Economic Institutions • The South & Institutions • Measuring development in the South • Group of 77 & South’s Response to the Global Economic System • 1964, 77 LDCs met to express dissatisfaction with the North dominated global economic system • March 1964, Group of 77 initiated the 1st UN Conference on Trade & development (UNCTAD) • UNCTAD, a permanent UN agency for • Allowing LDCs to set UNCTAD’s agenda • Encouraging GATT to give more priority to Southern trade interests • Supporting Southern protectionist policies • Serving as the voice for the South