1 / 16

Component-Based Software Development: Nurturing the Inner Designers

Component-Based Software Development: Nurturing the Inner Designers. Hoang Bao CSC 509 – Winter 2005. Concern. Software design: conception of a new software Current computer science and software engineer students do not have enough exposure to software design.

india
Télécharger la présentation

Component-Based Software Development: Nurturing the Inner Designers

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Component-Based Software Development: Nurturing the Inner Designers Hoang Bao CSC 509 – Winter 2005

  2. Concern • Software design: conception of a new software • Current computer science and software engineer students do not have enough exposure to software design.

  3. The most common response toward software design training: “I was trained to do some other job, but ended up doing software design.” (Winograd) • There are few software design programs out there. • London’s Royal College of Art – Computer Related Design • Stanford University – Human-Computer Interaction Design • MIT – Program in Media Arts and Sciences

  4. One way students learn about software development is through the software development processes. • Some processes encourage more involvement in software design than others.

  5. Hypothesis • Component-based development (CBD) provides better training for software design than other development methods.

  6. Building Design Consciousness • CBD helps to build the design consciousness (intuition, unspoken knowledge, and gut reaction) in participants.

  7. Goals • Analyze the hypothesis • Analyze how CBD build the design consciousness • Compare CBD with common development methods. Implication: If the hypothesis holds true, we can consider using CBD as a teaching tool to expose students to design.

  8. CBD • Focus on composing software systems with existing components. • CBSE Process • Analysis and components acquisition • Components-Oriented design • Components Composition • Integration Test • System Test

  9. Waterfall vs. Component-based

  10. Main Difference • CBD is component oriented • Component development – creation of parts as reusable entities.

  11. Component Development • Extra level of design • Components are designed separately from the final systems. • High requirements on functionality and flexibility

  12. Component Development (cont.) • Forces components developers to • Think of (possible) products the components might be a part of. • How the components fit into those products architecturally

  13. Building Consciousness • Over time, such actions build up a developer’s creativity and create a designer mindset for him.

  14. Current Literature • Haven’t been able to find many papers that directly relate CBD to software design. • The papers used in this research so far has been on the topics of: • Software engineering • Software design • CBD

  15. Further Works • Explore the component development process in more details. • How each step of the process contributes to design activities • More detail comparison of CBD and other methods.

  16. Bibliography • Aoyama, M. “New Age of Software Development: How Component-Based Software Engineering Changes the Way of Software Development?” International Workshop on CBSE. • Brown, AW., et Al. “The Current State of CBSE.” IEEE Software, 1998. • Crnkovic, I., and Larsson, M. “A Case Study: Demands on Component-based Development.” International Conference on Software Engineering, 2000. • Fredriksson, A. “Component-Based Systems Development” • Freeman, P., Wasserman, I. A., and Fairley E. R. “Essential elements of software engineering education.” Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Software engineering, 1976. • Shaw, M. “Software engineering education: a road map.” Proceedings of the Conference on The Future of Software Engineering, 2000. • Vitharana, P. “Risks and Challenges of Component-Based Software Development.” Communication of the ACM, 2003. • Winograd, T. (1996). Bringing Design to Software. New York: ACM Press.

More Related