40 likes | 157 Vues
This document outlines the current situation regarding the management of park and open space data, emphasizing the tools and applications utilized, such as ArcGIS and the Parks Asset Management System (PAMS). It discusses ongoing corporate asset management initiatives, crucial dataset attributes, and the need for flexibility in data models. Additionally, it highlights the importance of confirming data stewardship and addressing the long-term business requirements of park data management. Future directions and considerations for improving region-wide data accessibility are also explored.
E N D
Parks Common Data Model York Info Partnership – August 19, 2013
Current Situation • What map layers and other data are you managing? • Parks • Open Spaces • What attributes are you maintaining? • TBC • What tools or applications do you have that use the data? • ArcGIS • Parks Asset Management System (PAMS) • Street Trees • Natural Heritage Network
Projects and Activities (ITM perspective) • Goals • Confirm data stewardship and long-term business requirements • Needs/burning issues • TBC • Applications/Directions • Corporate Asset Management initiative • Ongoing project work in this area • ArcGIS 10.1 Upgrade
Ideas for the Data Model • From your perspective what should region-wide parks data look like? • When zoomed in to a park? • When zoomed out to the entire Region? • Symbolization is irrelevant in the data model • What map layers, datasets, and fields should we have? • Solution dependent • Data model must be flexible and extensible • Are there specific applications and tools that you think are important for everyone to have access to? • Applications are business dependent • Common viewer might be useful