1 / 51

Trade Costs , Heterogeneous Firms and International Portfolio Choice

Trade Costs , Heterogeneous Firms and International Portfolio Choice. Daniel Andrei Gerzensee , June 2 2008. 1. Motivation. 2. Literature. 3. Benchmark Model & Solution method. 4. Heterogeneous Firms. 5. Conclusion & Discussion. 1/15. World Market Capitalization. 2/15.

ira
Télécharger la présentation

Trade Costs , Heterogeneous Firms and International Portfolio Choice

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Trade Costs, HeterogeneousFirms and International Portfolio Choice Daniel Andrei Gerzensee, June 2 2008

  2. 1. Motivation 2. Literature 3. Benchmark Model & Solution method 4. HeterogeneousFirms 5. Conclusion & Discussion 1/15

  3. World MarketCapitalization 2/15

  4. World MarketCapitalization U.S. Market Cap (40% in 2005) 2/15

  5. World MarketCapitalization U.S. Market Cap (40% in 2005) 2/15

  6. World MarketCapitalization U.S. Market Cap (40% in 2005) All investorsshouldhold the market portfolio => U.S. investorsshouldhold 40% of domesticequities 2/15

  7. World MarketCapitalization True proportion of domesticequities in U.S. portfolios was 82% in 2005 U.S. Market Cap (40% in 2005) All investorsshouldhold the market portfolio => U.S. investorsshouldhold 40% of domesticequities 2/15

  8. World MarketCapitalization True proportion of domesticequities in U.S. portfolios was 82% in 2005 ? U.S. Market Cap (40% in 2005) All investorsshouldhold the market portfolio => U.S. investorsshouldhold 40% of domesticequities 2/15

  9. PotentialExplanations Corporategovernance and transparency Hedgingdomesticrisks Information asymmetries Behavioral-basedexplanations Costs and barriers for foreigninvestments 4/15

  10. PotentialExplanations Corporategovernance and transparency Hedgingdomesticrisks Information asymmetries Behavioral-basedexplanations Costs and barriers for foreigninvestments Recently, new methods have been developped to solve for optimal portfolios in DSGE models: Devereux and Sutherland (2006), Tille and Van Wincoop (2007), Evans and Hnatkovska (2005) 4/15

  11. PotentialExplanations Corporategovernance and transparency Hedgingdomesticrisks Information asymmetries Behavioral-basedexplanations Costs and barriers for foreigninvestments Recently, new methods have been developped to solve for optimal portfolios in DSGE models: Devereux and Sutherland (2006), Tille and Van Wincoop (2007), Evans and Hnatkovska (2005) THIS PAPER: (1) Solve for optimal portfolios in a two-country DSGE model. (2) Show how in a setup withheterogeneousfirms and fixed export costswecanobtain home equitypreference. 4/15

  12. Somerelatedliterature: Lucas (1982) Uppal (1993) Cole and Obstfeld (1991) Baxter and Jermann (1997) Obstfeld and Rogoff(2006) Kollmann (2006) Coeurdacier et. al. (2007) Coeurdacier (2006) Van Wincoop and Warnock (2007) Hnatkovska (2005) 5/15

  13. Somerelatedliterature: Lucas (1982) Uppal (1993) Cole and Obstfeld (1991) Baxter and Jermann (1997) Obstfeld and Rogoff(2006) Kollmann (2006) Coeurdacier et. al. (2007) Coeurdacier (2006) Van Wincoop and Warnock (2007) Hnatkovska (2005) • Extensions: • Heterogeneousfirms • Non-tradablesector • Fixedcosts to go to export • market BENCHMARK MODEL Show the difficulties to explain the home equitybias Show whywecanobtain home equitybias 5/15

  14. If goods are shipped to the another country, then a fraction τislost in transit (melting-icebergtradecosts) Export Export

  15. Takedifference: 7/15

  16. Takedifference: Treatthistemporarily as an exogenousi.i.d. variable 7/15

  17. Treatthistemporarily as an exogenousi.i.d. variable 7/15

  18. Treatthistemporarily as an exogenousi.i.d. variable 7/15

  19. Treatthistemporarily as an exogenousi.i.d. variable 7/15

  20. => Closedform solution: 7/15

  21. => Closedform solution: 7/15

  22. DOMESTIC EQUITY HELD BY DOMESTIC RESIDENTS: 7/15

  23. 8/15

  24. 8/15

  25. 8/15

  26. 8/15

  27. 8/15

  28. 8/15

  29. 8/15

  30. 8/15

  31. 8/15

  32. 8/15

  33. 9/15

  34. 9/15

  35. HeterogeneousFirms : Setup Pareto Distribution withparameterszmin and k Productivity 10/15

  36. HeterogeneousFirms : Setup Pareto Distribution withparameterszmin and k Non-exportingfirms Exportingfirms Productivity This firmwillearnexactlyzero export profits 10/15

  37. 11/15

  38. 11/15

  39. 11/15

  40. 11/15

  41. 11/15

  42. 12/15

  43. Fixed export costscanvary => IncompleteMarkets 13/15

  44. Fixed export costscanvary Number of exportingfirmscanvary => IncompleteMarkets 14/15

  45. CONCLUSIONS Re-confirmthatproportionaltradecostscannotlead to home bias. Fixed export costscan help. The mechanism: decreasecorrelationbetweenlaborincome and capital income. Incompletemarketscan help: more robustresults and betteroutcomes in terms of VWW statistic and consumption – RER anomaly. Show how a productivityshockcantransforminto a redistributiveshock. Introducedemandshocksinto a more intuitive way. 15/15

More Related