1 / 31

Perinatal Partnership Program of Eastern & Southeastern Ontario

Perinatal Partnership Program of Eastern & Southeastern Ontario. “Working Together for Quality Perinatal Care Through Innovation & Partnership”. The Niday Perinatal Database: A regional, population-based surveillance system via the internet. Paula Stewart, MD, FRCPC, Policy & Planning Advisor

irisa
Télécharger la présentation

Perinatal Partnership Program of Eastern & Southeastern Ontario

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Perinatal Partnership Program of Eastern & Southeastern Ontario “Working Together for Quality Perinatal Care Through Innovation & Partnership”

  2. The Niday PerinatalDatabase: A regional, population-based surveillance system via the internet Paula Stewart, MD, FRCPC, Policy & Planning Advisor Jim Bottomley, BScH, MHA, Director Perinatal Systems

  3. Perinatal Surveillance System • Partnership: PPPESO, hospitals, public health units (& eastern PHRED), physicians, midwives, CritiCall, Health Information Partnership, Community Health Centres • Working together towards optimal health of mother, baby & families

  4. Evolution of the Data System • 1997 - common logbook/definitions • 1998 - computerized data entry program (FoxPro), 16 hospitals • 1999 - Reports: regional; hospital specific; health unit region; new variables (postal code) • 2000 - audit, data used in PPPESO’s program priority setting process, HIP new partner, 2 new hospitals (out of region) adopt system

  5. What was working? All 16 hospitals entering data High quality Reports Partners find data useful PPPESO using data for program planning Challenges: Limited access to data by partners, limited report capabilities Extensive tech support Limited capacity of dataentry program (FoxPro) Timeliness of reports Why Change to a Web-based Platform?

  6. CritiCall Provincial Resource Registry • Already in use by all Ontario hospitals (also used in B.C.) • Sophisticated, encrypted, secure, internet-based platform • Allows direct, online data entry using web forms • No special hardware or software requirements (Internet Explorer) • Flexible access to data and reports • All technical support via CritiCall

  7. Evolution continued • 2001 - Niday Perinatal Database: all births, enhanced, real-time, web-based (CritiCall platform) • web-based data entry & real time reports • hospitals and midwives enter data online (including home births), in-kind, own their data • training and support for users • audits and quality assurance

  8. Application • Hospitals, public health units, midwifery practice groups, regional perinatal program (PPPESO), and other agencies (Early Years Centres, CHCs involved in perinatal care.) • Data for planning and evaluation of programs and services (monthly services indicator reports). • Monitor CQI programs. • Facilitates benchmarking with other like hospitals and public health unit regions.

  9. Evolution continued • Early Years Challenge grant • 2002-2004 - adoption of the database by other organizations in the province - expansion of variables - new neonatal screen - enhanced reports - links with new Early Years Centers in Ontario

  10. Development of Neonatal Indicators • Indicators selected based on criteria: data quality, availability and timelines and public health importance (important influence on health, significant number of people affected, significant impact, potential for improving health) • Collaborative process with regional partners and a provincial expert group.

  11. Niday Database Indicator Framework

  12. Public Health Variables • Postal Code • Language • Aboriginal • Antenatal Care Provider • # of antenatal visits • Prenatal Classes • Smoking • Intention to Breastfeed • Gestational age • Birthweight • Infant feeding on discharge • Neonatal death • Parkyn Screen • Hearing Screening

  13. Report Formats • Frequency Reports * - own data • Comparison Reports * - to aggregate data from similar types of hospitals • Key Indicator Reports * • Annual Regional Report • Hospital Specific Reports (annual) • Public Health Unit Reports (annual) • Midwifery Practice Group Reports (annual) * Web-based

  14. Report Samples Frequency Report Among women who have labour induced, proportion who have a cesarean birth, Any Hospital (sample data only) Comparison Report Among women who have a vaginal birth, proportion who have epidural anesthesia, by place of birth (sample data only).

  15. Figure 2 Number of women who gave birth and babies bornin the region*, by health unit region, 2002. * hospital births and home births in Eastern and Southeastern Ontario Source: Perinatal Partnership Program of Eastern and Southeastern Ontario, Niday Perinatal Database.

  16. Figure 18 Proportion of women who smoked after twenty weeks of pregnancy, by health unit region*, 2000-2002. * Eastern and Southeastern Ontario, home births included as of 2002 Source: Perinatal Partnership Program of Eastern and Southeastern Ontario, Niday Perinatal Database.

  17. Figure 4: Proportion of women who gave birth in the region*, by age group and by health unit region, 2002. * hospital births and home births in Eastern and Southeastern Ontario Source: Perinatal Partnership Program of Eastern and Southeastern Ontario, Niday Perinatal Database.

  18. Figure 7 Proportion of babies who were born with low birthweight (< 2,500 grams) in the region*, by health unit region, 2000-2002. * Eastern and Southeastern Ontario, home births included as of 2002 Source: Perinatal Partnership Program of Eastern and Southeastern Ontario, Niday Perinatal Database.

  19. Figure 8 Proportion of singleton babies who were born with low birthweight (<2,500 grams) in the region*, by health unit region, 2000-2002. * Eastern and Southeastern Ontario, home births included as of 2002 Source: Perinatal Partnership Program of Eastern and Southeastern Ontario, Niday Perinatal Database.

  20. Preterm Birth • Proportion of babies born preterm has changed little in past 3 years. (Figure 6) • Proportion of babies who were multiples increased in past 3 years by 17% (Figure 7) • The proportion of preterm births among singleton babies has decreased in the past 3 years (Figure 8) • The proportion of multiples who were born preterm has increased in the past 3 years (Figure 9) • Thus, the lack of overall decrease in preterm birth rates is due to the effect of increasing multiples and increasing preterm birth among those babies.

  21. Figure 6 Proportion of babies who were born preterm (less than 37 weeks), living in Eastern and Southeastern Ontario, 2000-2002. Source: Perinatal Partnership Program of Eastern and Southeastern Ontario, Perinatal Database.

  22. Figure 7 Number of babies (% of live births) who were multiples), living in Eastern and Southeastern Ontario, 2000-2002. 3.4% 2.9% 3.0% Source: Perinatal Partnership Program of Eastern and Southeastern Ontario, Perinatal Database.

  23. Figure 8 Proportion of singleton babies who were born preterm (less than 37 weeks), living in Eastern and Southeastern Ontario, 2000-2002. Source: Perinatal Partnership Program of Eastern and Southeastern Ontario, Perinatal Database.

  24. Figure 9 Proportion of multiples who were born preterm (less than 37 weeks), living in Eastern and Southeastern Ontario, 2000-2002. Source: Perinatal Partnership Program of Eastern and Southeastern Ontario, Perinatal Database.

  25. Provincial Role Out • During 2002-2003, the database has been adopted by: • 24 hospitals in greater Toronto area • Central West: 1 site • Northern: 4 sites • Central: 1 site • Central East: 3 sites, 1 midwifery practice • approximately 75% of Ontario births

  26. Lessons Learned • It is possible to develop a regional data system that is cost efficient, timely, accurate and useful • Winning conditions for change included: • keeping it simple, starting small with high quality results and building gradually • auditing and fine tuning the system • involving all stakeholders throughout the development process • strong leadership team and right skill mix

  27. Future Directions • Implement & evaluate neonatal module • Enhanced user report options • Collaborate in the development of a provincial reporting format • Future variables to be added/adjusted using consultative regional/provincial approach • Linking to other health planning organizations • Enhanced utilization of data for research

More Related