1 / 8

Breaking the rules ethically

Breaking the rules ethically. Sue Grieshaber Professor, Early Years Education School of Early Childhood Queensland University of Technology Brisbane, Australia. Difference ….

isaura
Télécharger la présentation

Breaking the rules ethically

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Breaking the rules ethically Sue Grieshaber Professor, Early Years Education School of Early Childhood Queensland University of Technology Brisbane, Australia

  2. Difference … • “the concept of life that Deleuze spends his entire philosophical life creating is the concept of difference: it is possible to intuit life as difference…life as the power to differ” (Colebrook, 2006, p. 1). • “For life, when thought properly, is a power or potential to create (and) not the creation of some proper or destined end” (Colebrook, 2006, p. 4).

  3. Morality • …is any set of constraining rules (such as a moral code) that is used to judge actions in relation to transcendent values of good and evil

  4. Morality and ethics • Morality suggests we should “judge ourselves on what we are and should be; whereas ethics implies that we do not yet know what we might become” (Marks, 2010, p. 88). • “The fundamental question of ethics is not “What must I do (which is a question of morality), but rather “What can I do, what am I capable of doing? (which is the proper question of an ethics without morality)…what are my capabilities and capacities?...How can I go to the limit of what I “can do”?” (Deleuze, 1994, p. 41, Difference and repetition).

  5. Transcendence • “transcendence is the fundamental problem of ethics, [and] what prevents ethics from taking place…[which means]…we can actually desire our own repression, a separation from our own capacities and powers” (Smith, 2011, p. 126). • “What would it be possible to think without assuming some pre-given (or transcendent) model?” (Colebrook, 2002, p. xvi).

  6. Vignettes • 2 selected because they emerged or stood out during the course of a year long action research project (tree climbing; eating where and when hungry) • 1 selected because of the existence of an alternative school that is characterised as different by community members

  7. Question • How can (and should we) encourage early childhood educators to consider: • What can I do, what am I capable of doing? How can I go to the limit of what I “can do”? (even if it means becoming different)

  8. References • Colebrook, C. (2006). Deleuze: A guide for the perplexed. London: Continuum. • Colebrook C. (2002). Understanding Deleuze. Crows Nest, NSW: Allen &Unwin. • Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition (Trans. P. Patton). New York: Columbia University Press. • Marks, J. (2010). Ethics. In A. Parr (Ed.), The Deleuze dictionary (Rev ed.) (pp. 87-89). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. • Smith, D. W. (2011). Deleuze and the question of desire: Towards an immanent theory of ethics. In N. Jun and D. W. Smith (eds.), Deleuze and ethics (pp. 123-141). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

More Related