1 / 6

2014 ALLOCATION PROCESS RECAP

2014 ALLOCATION PROCESS RECAP. METROPOLIS OF ATLANTA November 9, 2013. 2014 Allocation Summary. See Summary Handout Total amount allocated: $2,643,517 – same as the 2013 allocation Of 74 parishes 66 submitted allocation forms 2 submitted forms too late to be included in the calculation

isra
Télécharger la présentation

2014 ALLOCATION PROCESS RECAP

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 2014 ALLOCATION PROCESS RECAP METROPOLIS OF ATLANTA November 9, 2013

  2. 2014 Allocation Summary • See Summary Handout • Total amount allocated: $2,643,517 – same as the 2013 allocation • Of 74 parishes • 66 submitted allocation forms • 2 submitted forms too late to be included in the calculation • Gainesville, FL • Greenville, SC (St. George) • 6 have not submitted any data • Bluff City, TN • Cumming, GA • Fayetteville, NC • Jackson, MS • Ocala, FL • Gulf Shores, FL (too new)

  3. What Worked Well • 46 parishes submitted their forms on or around the due date, THANK YOU! • Of the 66 parishes that submitted allocation forms, all but 3 provided both 2011 and 2012 data as required, THANK YOU!

  4. What Did Not Work Well • The late submission of forms resulted in reduced time to enter and review data prior to the review at the Archdiocese level –remember we are all volunteers. • Some 2011 data were drastically different than what was submitted last year necessitating additional review and adjustments. • Some parishes only submitted 2012 data. • The missing two-year and one-year data resulted in penalty assessment by the Archdiocese that effectively affected all parishes in the Metropolis. • Some forms were hand-written and difficult to read –extra time and frustration to enter the data. • Some forms had wrong subtotal amounts necessitating additional review and correction.

  5. 2014 Appeal Process Schedule

  6. Thank You

More Related