1 / 13

Framework for Assessing Regional Natural Resource Management Investment Strategies

This framework empowers regional communities to prevent, stabilize, and reverse salinity trends while improving water quality. It aligns with NHT's objectives including biodiversity conservation, sustainable resource use, community capacity building, and institutional change. The model incorporates competitive, outcome-focused resource allocation and addresses tensions between top-down and bottom-up management approaches. Key principles emphasize transparency, objectivity, and cost-effectiveness, supported by various funding models such as equity-based, needs-based, and outcome-focused analyses to ensure effective resource investment and management.

isra
Télécharger la présentation

Framework for Assessing Regional Natural Resource Management Investment Strategies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Towards an analytical framework for assessing regional natural resource management investment strategies

  2. NAP goal is to empower regional communities to: prevent, stabilise and reverse trends in salinity improve water quality Context to developing a framework…

  3. Context to developing a framework… • NHT objectives: • Biodiversity Conservation • Sustainable Use of Natural • Resources • Community Capacity Building and • Institutional Change

  4. Regional model of delivery Context to developing a framework… • Competitive outcome-focused • resource allocation • High expectations

  5. Lack of common currency Context to developing a framework… • Tension between top-down & bottom-up management • Lack of consistent comparable data

  6. The process must also be: Transparent Objective Valid Time & cost effective Principles for Investment Framework Value for Money

  7. Increasing Complexity Outline of funding models 1. Simple Formula 2. Needs Based 3. Outcome Focused

  8. Simple Formula e.g. Equity, Area Model 1

  9. Needs Based Model 2 Surrogate Measure of Environmental Disturbance e.g. Per Capita, Ag Prod, Land Clearance Environmental Health Measure e.g. NLWRA Catchment Health Indicator, MDB Salinity Audit

  10. Outcome Focused Model 3 Traditional Cost / Benefit Analysis Asset Protection

  11. Asset First Sieve Second Sieve Outcome Focusede.g. Asset Protection Threat Effectiveness of Action Value for Money

  12. CONTINUE EVALUATION Sieve 1 - Asset / Threat VH H Asset M L L M VH H Threat KEY Continue Evaluation Suspend Evaluation Priority 1 Priority 2

  13. VH H Effectiveness M L L M H VH Value for Money KEY Recommend allocation Suspend evaluation Proceed Proceed if Priority 1 Sieve 2 - Effectiveness / Value for Money

More Related