1 / 34

Program Review

Program Review. Construction Management CMGT. Program Profile. Overview of program Items not addressed in self-study document Initial mention of program strengths Initial mention of areas of need Forum to inform the University community about the program. Program Profile.

ivan-santana
Télécharger la présentation

Program Review

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ProgramReview Construction Management CMGT

  2. Program Profile • Overview of program • Items not addressed in self-study document • Initial mention of program strengths • Initial mention of areas of need • Forum to inform the University community about the program

  3. Program Profile • History & Degrees Offered • Associate of Applied Science (AAS) in 1980 – CST • Bachelor of Science (BS) in 1984 – CSIT • Changed name of BS in 1998 – CMGT • Accredited by ACCE in 1999 and again in 2004 • Creation of Surveying track in CMGT - Surveying • Creation of track in MST 2004 • Accreditation Information

  4. Program Profile • Description of the program: “Mixture of Applied, Technical, Business/Management Courses rounded off with a strong General Studies foundation.” • Description of Graduates: near 100% placement rate at salaries between $35,000 and $50,000 • Program Strengths: Civic Engagement & Cooperative Education

  5. Program Objectives • Mission Statement • Measurable goals based on that mission • Alignment of mission and goals to the University: • Mission • Vision • Core Values • Strategic Plan

  6. Program Objectives • Mission Statement: The mission of Construction Management at Northern Kentucky University is to provide the tri-state community with the best qualified, most employable construction personnel in the region.

  7. Program Objectives • Discussion of Goals • Provide a strong curriculum including Technical, Business/ Management, and General Education coursework to prepare graduates for their careers. • Maintain and Improve Status …in this region. • Provide leadership and service to the tri-state construction industry, community, and NKU. • Maintain Professional Accreditation.

  8. Program Organization • Describe the program organization and how well that organization works for you. • Describe the connections between your program and others (service and general studies courses are described elsewhere). • Describe partnerships and external entities.

  9. Program Organization • Team-Based Organization • Dept. of Technology (DOT) Management Team • Construction Management Team • Relationships with other programs • LDR, ILR, ENTP and other COB programs, Gen Ed. • External Relationships • CMGT Advisory boards, scholarship providers (CSI, KAPS, HBAs), Perkins Grant, Civic Engagement

  10. CMGT 11% All Other Majors in Technology 42% Construction Management (CMGT) 58% All Other Majors in College 89% Credit Hour Production Department of Technology Credit Hour Production by Discipline College of Professional Studies Students • Feel free to use graphics

  11. Students • Compare with other groups – if it helps • Be sure to explain if number are low • Trends, patterns, and projections

  12. Students • Data sources (SIS, Institutional Research, etc) • Reporting numbers – active (165) vs. declared (214) • Relationship to accreditation CMGT Enrollment by Year

  13. Students • Problems with CPE reporting • Once the AAS is achieved, the CMGT is not counted – actual CMGT grads are closer to: 2001 – 30 2002 – 32 2003 – 36

  14. Students • Recruitment Strategies • Articulation Agreements (CSTCC, LCC, KCTCS, Sinclair, Ivy Tech) • Undeclared Students • Statewide ATC Agreements – up to 6 hours • Admission Standards • Advising • Scholarships

  15. Students • Projected Growth • Evidence for support • Example: 8% -10% Based on history and… • USA Today, Dec. 31, 2004 …Residential and Commercial development in the next ¼ century eclipse anything seen in previous generations… • Engineering News Record, Jan. 25, 2005 …Industry Firms Are Set to Swell Employee Ranks in 2005….80% of the top 500 firms firms plan significant staff additions this year…

  16. Personnel (Faculty & Staff) • Faculty Profile Sheets • Narrative for each faculty member • Describe courses particularly if serving general education courses – helps to clarify faculty/student ratios • Narrative for each staff person • Secretaries, advisors, directors, assistants (e.g. lab), graduate assistants, student works, others…

  17. Personnel (Faculty & Staff) • Faculty Profiles as first Appendix • Full-Time Faculty – and construction courses taught • Paul Cooper – CMGT coordinator, teaches 3-4 classes per semester. Tenured • Sean Foley – teaches 3 classes per semester, director of civic engagement for DOT, finishing Ph.D. Tenure Track • Ed Workman – Director of MST, teaches in Industrial Technology Teacher Preparation Program, teaches 1 class per semester. Tenured • Majed Dabdoub – teaches 4-5 classes per semester, fulltime job outside the University. Non-Tenure Track

  18. Personnel (Faculty & Staff) • Secretarial Staff • Cooperative Education • DOT Advising Center

  19. Curriculum • Remember this is not a course review but program review! • Learning Outcomes for the PROGRAM… • Contributions to General Education • List of courses and programs • How are they covered by faculty (not currently asked for) • Strengths and Weaknesses • Integrated Technology (web-enhanced/based) • Cooperative Education and Internships

  20. Curriculum • Learning Outcomes shaping course content • Curriculum Topical Content (CTC) - ACCE • Sequencing of courses • Cycle of courses

  21. Curriculum • Other programs that utilize our courses • Evaluation by ACCE strengths/weaknesses • Web-Enhanced Courses: • IET 301, IET 320, IET 324, IET 431, IET 494 • Web-Based Course: • IET 303

  22. Curriculum • Cooperative Education Program • Model Program • Over 50% of all DOT enrollment • Approx. 33% of all NKU co-op students are serviced by the DOT co-op office

  23. ResourcesInformation and Instructional Equipment • Library Holdings • Capital Equipment • Strengths/weaknesses • Pressing Unmet Needs

  24. Public Engagement • Report on the different types of engagement: • Service Learning, Mayerson Classes, Work with local schools, Work with non-profits, Judging competitions, Serving on professional/community boards, etc… • Remember to include project outcomes. • Show how engagement relates to University visions and strategic plan.

  25. Program Quality Assessment This can be problematic! – • Examples of assessing student Learning: • Capstone Projects • Comprehensive Exams • National Licensure Tests • Portfolios • Student Satisfaction with program • Completing the Assessment Cycle

  26. Construction Management Assessment Guide

  27. Quantitative Sources: • Graduate, Alumni, & Employer Surveys • Course Evaluations • CPC Exam Results • Qualitative Sources: • Remarks on Surveys • Capstone Evaluations • Discussions with Employers, Alumni, Students, Advisory Boards • National Competitions • Sources & Individuals: • ACCE Accreditation Requirements • Northern Kentucky University • Industry Advisory Board • Alumni Advisory Board • Co-op Employers • CM Faculty • Students • Common Areas of Change: • Teaching Methodology • Course Content • Course Objectives • Curriculum Content & Objectives • Advising • Capstone Courses • Assessment Instruments • Assessment Procedures/Plan • Methods & Meetings: • Statistical Analysis of Quantitative Data • Advisory Board Discussions • Regular CM Faculty Meetings • Yearly CM Faculty Retreats • Documentation of Findings Assessment Plan Sources & Outputs Map

  28. Program Benchmarking • Show similarities and differences between your program and benchmark institutes with similar programs/degrees. • Comparisons should also be used as evidence for program structure OR needed change.

  29. External Evaluators • This review should occur immediately following external evaluations to help reduce load on preparers. • Schedule in concert with accreditation visits. • May add additional insight into how to improve program.

  30. Program Planning • Start creating a strategic plan • If you have a plan, update it • Show connections to University’s Strategic Plan

  31. Future of Program Review • Self-Study format is being discussed by the Program Review Steering Committee. • This presentation incorporates some of the possible changes, e.g. vitas, future questions… • Teamwork appears to be paramount!

  32. Architectural Engineering Technology • Approved at the following levels: • Department • College • Council on Postsecondary Education • Stopped at the Provost’s desk (Redding) in 2003 • High community support • Colleges asking to create articulation agreements • Quite possibly outgrow CMGT quickly

  33. Questions Comments Thank You Paul D. Cooper Sean P. Foley

More Related