1 / 24

HE Quallity Assurance in Serbia CAQA representative

1 st Quality Assurance Workshop . HE Quallity Assurance in Serbia CAQA representative . Belgrade, 19/20 November 2007. The Law on Higher Education (2005) “Službeni glasnik 76/2005”. Conference of high school principals. NATIONAL ASSEMBLY. Conference of Serbian Universities.

ivi
Télécharger la présentation

HE Quallity Assurance in Serbia CAQA representative

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 1st Quality Assurance Workshop HE Quallity Assurance in Serbia CAQA representative Belgrade, 19/20 November 2007

  2. The Law on Higher Education (2005) “Službeni glasnik 76/2005” Conference of high school principals NATIONAL ASSEMBLY Conference of Serbian Universities NATIONAL COUNCIL OF HIGHER EDUCATION MINISTRY OF EDUCATION ACCREDITATIONANDQUALITYASSURANCECOMMISSION (CAQA) Institutions of higher education

  3. Republic of Serbia TheNationalCouncilfor Higher Education of the Republic of Serbia establishedthe AccreditationandQualityAssuranceCommission (15 members) in June 2006. The Accreditation and quality assurance commission has been set up, as a task force, by the National council of higher education to deal with accreditation, quality assurance of higher education institutions and evaluation of study programs.

  4. The objective of quality control in higher education is to maintain and raise the quality of teaching in higher education institutions (HEIs), to improve the organisation of HEIs, to promote their greater responsibility for their own activities, and to ensure their competitiveness in the international arena.

  5. Accreditation and Quality Assurance Commissionproposed to • the National Council the rules,regulations procedures and standards for • self-assessment and quality control, • external quality control and • accreditation of the high education institutions and study programmes. The National Council of higher education, at its session of 20 Octobeer 2006, approved the following: RULES AND REGULATIONS ON STANDARDS OF SELF-ASSESSMENT AND QUALITY CONTROL OF HEIs 1. RULES AND REGULATIONS OF ACCREDITATION STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES FOR HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS AND THEIR STUDY PROGRAMS 3. RULES AND REGULATIONS ON STANDARD PROCEDURES OF EXTERNAL QUALITY CONTROL 2. www.mps.sr.gov.yu www.kapk.org.yu

  6. RULES AND REGULATIONS ON STANDARDS OF SELF-ASSESSMENT AND QUALITY CONTROL OF HEIs 1. STANDARDSFORSELF-ASSESSMENT AND QUALITY CONTROLIN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS Standard1: Quality assurance strategy Standard2: Standards and procedures for quality assurance Standard3: Quality assurance system Standard 4:Study program quality Standard5: Teaching process quality Standard 6: Quality of science research, artistic and professional work Standard 7: Quality of teachers and associates Standard 8: Quality of students Standard 9: Quality of textbooks, literature, library and IT resources Standard 10: Quality of management of higher education institution and quality of non-teaching support Standard 11: Quality of premises and equipment Standard 12: Financing Standard13: The role of students in self-assessment and quality control Standard 14 :Systemic follow up and periodic quality control

  7. INSTRUCTION FOR PREPARATION OF SELF-ASSESSMENT REPORT The self-assessment report is an obligatory document in the accreditation file of the higher education institution. The report should be concise and contain all the details of vital interest for the operation of the higher education institution relevant to the quality of the education process. The self-assessment report should contain the estimate of fulfillment of each individual standard, observing the instructions for implementation and objective facts characterizing a higher education institution. Within the elaboration of each standard the level of fulfillment should be stated and measures for improvement of quality. The self-assessment report should be concluded with a general evaluation of fulfillment of quality standards of the higher education institution.

  8. RULES AND REGULATIONS ON STANDARD PROCEDURES OF EXTERNAL QUALITY CONTROL 2. STANDARDSFOREXTERNAL QUALITY CONTROL IN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS Standard 1: Reliance on the results of self-control of higher education institution Standard 2: Method of external quality control Standard 3: The areas of external quality control Standard 4:Results of external quality control of higher education institution Standard 5: Organization and participants in the external quality control Standard 6: The procedure of external quality control Standard 7: Reporting Standard 8: Periodic checks Standard 9: Improvement of the procedure for external quality control Rules and regulationson standard procedures of external quality control Rules and regulationson standard procedures of external quality control

  9. RULES AND REGULATIONS ON STANDARD PROCEDURES OF EXTERNAL QUALITY CONTROL Article 7 The commission shall, at the proposal of the sub-commission, referred to in Article 6 of the present Rules and Regulations, appoint two reviewers to analyze and evaluate the results of self-assessment and quality review of the higher education institutions (hereinafter: self-assessment of higher education institution). Each reviewer shall analyze the documents submitted by the higher education institutions and control: whether the self-assessment of the higher education institution was performed in compliance with the standards for self-assessment of higher education institution; which standards of self-assessment were fully or partially met or not at all; what areas of activity of higher education institution in terms of quality were found as satisfactory, partly satisfactory or dissatisfactory. The reviewer shall report on the analysis performed further to par 2 of this Article to the sub-commission, with the assessment of compliance with the standards for external quality control of a higher education institution and proposal of the measures of alleviation of weaknesses observed.

  10. RULES AND REGULATIONS OF ACCREDITATION STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES FOR HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS AND THEIR STUDY PROGRAMS 3. • ACCREDITATION STANDARDS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS • SUPPLEMENTAL ACCREDITATION STANDARDS OF HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS WITHIN THE GIVEN SCIENCE EDUCATION NAMELY SCIENCE ARTISTIC FIELD • ACCREDITATION STANDARDS FOR THE FIRST AND SECOND LEVEL OF HIGHER EDUCATION • ADDITIONAL STANDARDSFOR ACCREDITATION OF STUDY PROGRAMS WITHINAGIVENU EDUCATIONSCIENTIFICNAMELYARTISTICFILED • ACCREDITATION STANDARDS FOR STUDY PROGRAM OF DOCTORAL STUDIES • SUPPLEMENTARYACCREDITATIONSTANDARDSOFDOCTORALSTUDIES WITHIN THE EDUCATIONAL SCIENTIFIC NAMELY EDUCATIONAL ARTISTIC FIELD

  11. ACCREDITATION STANDARDS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS • SUPPLEMENTAL ACCREDITATION STANDARDS OF HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS WITHIN THE GIVEN SCIENCE EDUCATION NAMELY SCIENCE ARTISTIC FIELD Standard 1. Basic goals and objectives of higher education institution Standard 2. Planning and control Standard 3. Organization and administration Standard 4. Studies Standard 5. Science research and artistic work Standard 6. Teaching staff Standard 7. Non-teaching staff Standard 8. Students Standard 9. Premises and equipment Standard 10. Library, textbooks and IT support Standard 11. Sources of funds Standard 12. Internal mechanisms for quality assurance Standard 13. Transparency

  12. ACCREDITATION STANDARDS FOR THE FIRST AND SECOND LEVEL OF HIGHER EDUCATION • ADDITIONAL STANDARDSFOR ACCREDITATION OF STUDY PROGRAMS WITHINAGIVENU EDUCATIONSCIENTIFICNAMELYARTISTICFILED Standard 1. Study program structure Standard 2. Study program purpose Standard 3. Objectives of the study program Standard 4. Competences of the graduated students Standard 5. Curriculum Standard 6. Quality, modernity and international compliance Standard 7. Admission of students Standard 8. Grading and advancement of students Standard 9. Teaching staff Standard 10. Organization and material resources Standard 11. Quality control Standard 12. Distance learning courses

  13. ACCREDITATION STANDARDS FOR STUDY PROGRAM OF DOCTORAL STUDIES • SUPPLEMENTARYACCREDITATIONSTANDARDSOFDOCTORALSTUDIES WITHIN THE EDUCATIONAL SCIENTIFIC NAMELY EDUCATIONAL ARTISTIC FIELD Special standard - Competence of the higher education institution to carry out the doctoral studies Standard 1. Study program structure Standard 2. Study program goals Standard 3. Study program objectives Standard 4. Competence of graduated students Standard 5. Curriculum Standard 6. Quality, modernity and international compliance of study program Standard 7. Admission of students Standard 8. Grading and advancement of students Standard 9. Teaching staff Standard 10. Organizational and material resources Standard 11. Quality control

  14. Accreditation and Quality Assurance Commission • prepared and published • (December 2006. ) • INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPILING ACCREDITATION DOCUMENTS OF • HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS • STUDY PROGRAMS IN THE FIRST AND SECOND LEVELS OF HIGHER EDUCATION • DOCTORAL STUDIES (October 2007. ) ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPILING ACCREDITATION DOCUMENTS OF HIGH EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS, STUDY PROGRAMS, DOCTORAL STUDIES

  15. The Law on Higher Education “Službeni glasnik 76/2005” All higher education institutions in the Republic of Serbia and their respective study programs shall be subject to the procedure for accreditation. By virtue of Article 116., item 1. of the Law on Higher Education, the accreditaton of all Institutions of higher education in Serbia should be finished to the june 2009. Institutions of higher education in Serbia achieve accreditation from Commision for Accreditation and Quallity Assurance CAQA 250 Institutions of higher education

  16. The accreditation procedure The accreditation request supported by the data and documents The Commission form sub-commission The Commission, at the proposal by sub-commission, designate two reviewers The sub-commission Visit institution- report The reviewer report to the sub-commission The sub-commission finalize the draft proposal for accreditation ОДЛУКА О АКРЕДИТАЦИЈИ The Commission The accreditation decision 1 reject the accreditation accept the accreditation request and grant the Accreditation Certificate postpone decision on accreditation 2 complain to the National Council of Higher Education

  17. RULES AND REGULATIONS OF ACCREDITATION STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES FOR HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS AND THEIR STUDY PROGRAMS Article 10 The Commission shall, at its first session after the receipt of the draft decision of accreditation, consider the same and possibly approve it. The accreditation decision shall be taken when more than half of the Commission members shall vote in favor. The decision of the Commission shall: accept the accreditation request and grant the Accreditation Certificate; reject the accreditation and issue the decision denying the accreditation. The Commission may postpone decision making on accreditation and warn the higher education institution of the omissions in terms of the quality of work of the higher education institution and/or study program and stipulate the deadline for elimination of the weaknesses, and issue relevant conclusion.

  18. Article 11 The founder or higher-education institution may file a complaint contesting the denial of accreditation with the National Council of Higher Education (hereinafter: National Council) within 30 days of the date of receipt of the decision. Article 12 The National Council shall reject the complaint is it shall find is groundless, untimely or signed by an unauthorized person. The National Council shall reject the complaint is it shall find that the procedure for accreditation had been properly applied and the decision taken in compliance with the law and the present Rules and Regulations. If the National Council shall find defects in the accreditation procedure its may: annul the decision of the Commission and decide on its own on the accreditation request based on the facts found by the Commission; annul the decision and order the Commission to repeat the accreditation procedure, in whole or in part. The National Council may ask the Commission, in the complaint process, to supplement the data of relevance for the decision making. The decision of the National Council shall be final.

  19. In the January 2006., CAQA started the accreditation follow-up procedure for 78 high schools and 287 study programs 260 educated reviewers 730 reviewers reports The sub-commission finalized 365 the draft proposal for accreditation

  20. ПРЕГЛЕД ПОДАТАКА О АКРЕДИТАЦИЈИ ВИШИХ ШКОЛА 25. 01.2007- 25.10.2007 • 1. КОМИСИЈА ЗА АКРЕДИТАЦИЈУ (КАПК) : • Од 78 установе: • Акредитована 51 установа (65%) • Није акредитована 27 установа (35 %) • Од од 287 студиских програма: • Акредитовано 186 (65%) • Није акредитовано 101 (35 %) • КАПК у поновном разматрању након решења Националног савета о поништењу решења КАПК потврдио мишљења из предходних решења у 20 случајева. • 2. НАЦИОНАЛНИ САВЕТ • Примио 34 жалбе ( једна установа се није жалила, и 9 установа није уложило жалбу на ускраћиванје акредитације студијских програма) • Одбио 9 (26%) жалби и потврдио решења КАПК . • Поништио 25 (74%) решења КАПК: • Поништио 5 решења и акредитовао установу и студијске програме • Поништио 20 решења КАПК и упутио КАПК на поновну акредитацију - разматрање • 3.АКРЕДИТАЦИОНИ СТАТУС УСТАНОВА ДО 25.10.2007. • Број не акредитованих установа након окончаног поступка износи 9 + 1 или 13 % • Број акредитованих установа 51+3= 54 или 69% • Број акредитованих студијских програма 186 +9 = 195 или 68%

  21. Commision for Accreditation and Quallity Assurance CAQA granted the Accreditation Certificate 78 high schools 51 institutions (65%) 186 study programs(65%) rejected the accreditation 27 institutions (35 %) 101 study programs (35 %) The higher-education institution make file a complaint in 34 cases The National Council rejected 9 complaints National Council of Higher Education annul 25 (74%) the decision of the Commission The accreditation decisions, data, November 2007. granted the Accreditation Certificate 51+3+ 4= 57 (73%) rejected the accreditation 14%

More Related