Download
3 safety considerations n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
3) Safety Considerations PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
3) Safety Considerations

3) Safety Considerations

167 Vues Download Presentation
Télécharger la présentation

3) Safety Considerations

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. 3) Safety Considerations • Safety Overview • Impart basic knowledge of pressure and the forces exerted. • Understand how temperature causes burn injury. • Examples of Safety Incidents • Understand Site Safety values and systems.

  2. Safety is a Value • No work should be started if it cannot be completed safely. • The goal is that personnel will go home as they arrived - safe and without injury. • Personnel should not be injured in the manufacture of a product, which is designed to improve the quality of life.

  3. Hazardous Process Safety • Examples of Hazardous Processes Are: • Vessels (Pressurized) • Plant steam (60psi, 150C) • Clean steam (20-30psi) • WFI (Water for Injection) • Compressed air (95-105psi) • CIP systems (~100psi, ~80C, CORROSIVE) • Solution transfer lines • Oxygen and nitrogen gas (& cylinders)

  4. Hazardous Process Safety • Possible Hazards: • Impact from a blast or release of compressed liquid or gas • Traumatic injury from flying parts • Burns from the release of hot liquid or gasses • Contact with released liquid or gas (chemical burns) • Fire resulting from the escape of flammable liquid or gas (e.g. ethyl alcohol or oxygen leaks)

  5. Safety Considerations Are you aware of the hazards of pressure and temperature?

  6. …..but its also a time-bomb, waiting to go off in your face. Pressure Vessel Safety Considerations This is a processing vessel…..

  7. Pressure & Force Lets review the details Can you get hurt with low pressure? Force = Pressure X Area It’s like many small weights sitting on a surface (area) which add up to a large weight. So at a given pressure, The LARGER the area, The GREATER the force

  8. 12” X 12” Square 12” Dia Sight Glass 14.5 psig 1 Bar 1,639 Pounds of Force Example 1 If Force = Pressure x Area, then, 14.5 psi pressure on a 12” Diameter Sight Glass surface area will produce 1,640 pounds of force. (Calculation: 14.5 x 3.14 x 62 = 1,639 lbs) …this is equivalent to an object that weighs 1,639 lbs! That's ~¾ of a Tonne (1 Tonne = 2205 lbs)

  9. 10 psig (~0.7 Bar) 5,760 Pounds of Force Example 2 Again, Force = Pressure X Area, so: 24” X 24” Square Door 10 psi pressure on a 24”x24” square surface area (576 square inches) is 5,760 pounds of force! (Calculation: 576 X 10= 5,760) This is equivalent to an object that weighs 5,760 lbs.

  10. 12” X 12” Square 8” Dia Sight Glass 3 psig 4 6 80 8 2 150 Pounds of Force 40 120 lbf/in2 10 bar Example 3 Even with a few PSI say 3 PSI which may not be noticeable on the Pressure gauge

  11. BE AWARE! Can you get hurt with low pressure? ABSOLUTELY ! Never underestimate the potential of a low pressure or vacuum condition to cause damage. ….and be especially careful with large surfaces like manways. 1 psi may not even register on the gauge but it’s enough to send a hatch flying if the triclamp is removed and the gasket is stuck.

  12. This door had the equivalent of 1915 lbs of force on it. And at only 2.8 psi. The door weighs about 15 pounds - much less than the 1915 lbs of force on it. When it came loose, it slammed open seriously injuring a person. Low Pressure Hazard

  13. Over-Pressured Tank This tank was fitted with: • A high level alarm, which was accepted, and then forgotten • A pressure control system, which was out of service • A pressure relief valve which was found to be blocked • ….so when the product was transferred into the tank, it over pressured until the roof ruptured, even though the pressure was only a few psi over hydrostatic

  14. Atmospheric Pressure Vacuum Vacuum Safety • The same concepts apply to vacuum. However, in vacuum systems the pressure is pushing inward, not outward. The pressure comes from the atmosphere - we don’t feel it but a tank does when you pull vacuum on it. • Atmospheric Pressure (at sea level) is about 14.7 psi (1 Bar), therefore full vacuum is -14.7 psi.

  15. Vacuum Tank Hazards • The tanker was being steam cleaned and, at the end of the job, the hatches were closed. With no vacuum breaker fitted, as the steam condensed, the tanker imploded….. • Remember with a vacuum pulled, Hatches may appear stuck - venting to Equalise Pressure, eases hatch removal. Never pressurise in an effort to remove “Stuck Hatches” • When the pressure inside the vessel is lower than atmospheric pressure, the force acts inwards, with sometimes spectacular results….

  16. Covered Vent • This tank collapsed while being pumped out! Painters had covered the vent with plastic sheeting. The steel tank collapsed before the plastic sucked through.

  17. Lack of Venting again • This tank also collapsed while being pumped out!

  18. Always open vent valves if Possible 8 6 10 4 12 14 2 Sight glass bar 16 0 Follow the Correct procedure when removing or opening vessel entry points • When removing sight glass to make chemical addition to water in media tank • Always open vent valves if possible, to ensure Pressure Equalisation. • Check the pressure gauge reading first, remember to eliminate “parallax error” from your reading. Ensure pressure has not been isolated at the regulator. • Never Pressurise a vessel to break a seal, because at just a few PSI the subsequent pressure release will be detrimental to property or the person.

  19. Projectile Hazards • Unsecured gauges, valves, and probes can become “bullets” shot from tank penetrations • Double check tightness before adding pressure • Relieve pressure before disassembling by Venting • Hoses Drain Systems • Process Components • Sampling Points

  20. Flailing Hoses • Pressurised Hose connection that fails will Flail. • Double Check tri-clamp connection before adding pressure to hose. • Routinely check the condition of hoses for any signs of bulging or failure. • A whipping line can break bones and damage equipment, • If the line gets free leave the area immediately and shut off flow to the line. • Never attempt to grab a whipping Line or Hose. • Flexible hosing should be kept as short as possible

  21. Hot WFI at 85 Degrees C Clean Steam at 145 Degrees C Both at Pressures between 6 Bar and 1.2 Bar. High Risk of Scald injury from hot spray or leak. High risk of Burns from surface of hot pipe work or adjacent hot equipment. Temperature, Burns and Scalds

  22. First Degree Burn - Superficial Involve the epidermis, which appears pink or red. Are painful, don’t blister and usually heal within seven days, without scarring. Sunburn is usually a first-degree burn.

  23. Partial Thickness - Second Degree Burns Partial-thickness burns involve the epidermis and some of the dermis. Deep partial-thickness burns involve the epidermis and deeper extension into the dermis. Protective ability of the skin is lost. Partial-thickness burns are painful and appear moist.

  24. Full Thickness – Third Degree Burns Full-thickness burns involve the epidermis, the entire dermis and the subcutaneous tissues. They appear white or brown, charred and leathery. Not painful as they are deep enough to have damaged the nerve endings. Are often surrounded by painful partial-thickness wounds.

  25. Incidents to take note of • Case #1: Tank Light Incident • Case #2: Production Support Sight Glass Accident • Case #3: Operator Burn Incident • Case #4: Manway opening at less than two Bar

  26. Case # 1: Tank Light Incident • Technician was removing tank light (yellow arrow) • Technician did not check pressure gauge first • Start-up engineers had pressurized tank to 15 psi • Light fixture blew off, stopped by pipe above. Sounded like shotgun • Property damage only. Luck ‘prevented’ injury.

  27. Vent valve closed Sight glass Case # 2: Production Support Sight Glass Accident • Technician was removing sight glass to make powder addition to water in Buffer Tank • Technician did not check pressure gauge first • Vent valve usually open, but had been left closed by others from prior activity; water addition created 18 psi inside tank • Sight glass struck chin: 11 stitches and a broken tooth

  28. Case # 3: Burn Incident • The Technician was opening a Drain Valve to empty a vessel filled with 82oC WFI • The Clamp holding the Drain Valve Failed allowing the hose to disconnect. • The Operator was Sprayed with Hot Water.

  29. Case # 3: Burn Incident Case # 2 Operator Burn Incident The Technician: • Failed to check hoses and clamps • Misread pressure gauge before opening the drain valve • Didn’t wear proper PPE Also: • Training Aids Did Not Mention PPE Requirements for the Job. • Poor arrangement of pressure gauge and drain valve handle contributed to the Technician misreading the gauge.

  30. Case # 4: Manway Opening at Less than Two Bar • The pressure in the vessel had risen to 24.7 PSI (1.74 Barg) during a routine operation. • Once the pressure reached 24.7 PSI, the tri-clamp was unable to keep the manway in place and the manway blew open, causing the tri-clamp to hit and damage the ceiling above. • Pressure acting on 12” Port (Surface Area = 113 Sq. Inches) • Approx. 2,800 Pounds of Force

  31. Hole in ceiling where tri-clamp penetrated (6 ft up) Tri-clamp Deformation Case # 4: Manway Opening at Less than Two Bar

  32. Case # 4: Manway Opening at Less than Two Bar • Failure occurred at a vessel pressure <2.0 Bar • A vent valve was programmed to open when the pressure reached approximately 1.8 Bar • This valve did not open. • Both of the clamp bolts were cut prior to use (To fit) • The bolt that failed was cut shorter than the other one • The Operator was unable to see how well the connection was made as dome nuts covered the thread of the bolts • The Vessel was within normal operating pressures • The area was open to personnel

  33. Safety Systems • Tool Box Talks • Communications of Issues. • Link Productivity with Safety and Quality. • Incident communication and prevention. • Learn from mistakes. • Safe Plan of Action • Hazard review of the task. • Involve all involved in the task. • To be done on site while reviewing the hazard • Where a Safe Plan is carried out – Quality and productivity follow suite

  34. Schedule Based Project – the risk • Serious Injury or incident will affect the project schedule. • Loss time due to: • The Incident itself. • Personal loss to individual and family. • Incident investigation. • Investigation by H.S.A or Garda. • Closure of part of the project. • Loss of moral. • The list is endless…….

  35. 4) Validation • Introduction • What requires validation? • Pre Qualification Activities • Stages of Validation

  36. What is Validation? Ronseal Definition • Proving with documented evidence that ‘Ronseal does exactly what it says on the tin!!’….. Sober Definition • The purpose of validation is to establish documented evidence which provides a high degree of assurance that premises, facilities, equipment or processes have been designed in accordance with the requirements of current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP).

  37. What Areas Require Validation? All systems or just cGMP systems • Analytical and Quality Procedures • Instruments • Critical Support Systems (e.g. HVAC, WFI) • Raw Materials and Packaging • Equipment Design, Installation and Operation • Facility Design, Installation and Operation • Maintenance Systems • Manufacturing Processes • Product Design and Development • Control Systems

  38. Qualification Activities • GMP systems and equipment qualified through documented challenge testing to verify that design intent and user requirements have been met • GMP definition includes systems and equipment used in manufacture, control, monitoring, storage and analysis of pharmaceutical product • Where appropriate, documented successful pre-qualification activities will be cited and referenced in lieu of repeating execution steps in IQ (Installation Qualification) and OQ (Operational Qualification) • IQ and OQ required for all GMP systems • PQ for critical utility and manufacturing equipment

  39. Where do you start ?

  40. Validation Master Plan (VMP) • Generally prepared for the start-up of a large project • Serves as both a guide to the Client and is used as a review document for regulatory agencies • Develops concurrently with the project - a living document • Purpose of a VMP • To briefly describe why, what, by whom, how and when the validation is to be carried out. • Provide up-to-date information about the actual state of affairs relating to validation • Demonstrate the companies commitment to carry out validation

  41. Pre-Qualification Activities • Purpose is to establish system / equipment installation and functionality prior to commencing formal qualification testing • Steps include: • Enhanced Design Review • Factory Acceptance Testing (FAT) • Commissioning • Site Acceptance Testing (SAT)

  42. Example: Key Phases in a Project Equipment Commissioning & Validation Design & Engineering Construction Production Process Trials Cleaning Program phase 1 Cleaning Program phase 2 Exhibit Batches Complete Start of Development Batches Cleaning Program phase 3 Process Validation

  43. Stages of Validation • Design Qualification (DQ) • Installation Qualification (IQ) • Operational Qualification (OQ) • Performance Qualification (PQ) • Process Validation (PV) • Cleaning Validation (CV) • Revalidation (RV)

  44. Design Qualification (DQ) • Provides documented evidence that the design/ quotation acceptance satisfies the approved User Requirement Specification (URS). • Documenting that we are getting what we asked for in our design i.e. Miele Dish Washer capable of washing at temps from 25 to 80 Deg C, with air drying on a range of dirty soils with detergent capability

  45. Installation Qualification (IQ) • Provides documented verification that all key aspects of the installation adhere to design specification, regulatory and statutory codes and manufacturers recommendations. • Think of a dish washer at home. Checking vendor is installing it correctly as per the recommendations…Consider does this always go well?!!

  46. Operational Qualification (OQ) • Provides documented verification that the system and sub-systems perform as intended throughout all anticipated operating ranges. • Think of dish washer again - Proving that it is capable of running all of its cycles with process water in your house and a range of detergents …drainability, spray coverage etc

  47. Performance Qualification (PQ) • Provides documented evidence that a GMP utility service or process when operated or carried out within defined parameters will consistently meet pre-determined acceptance criteria. PQ will be performed on those systems or processes that require performance data for verifying proper operation. • Proving that with Production materials, i.e. dirty plates, that it will consistently clean to its pre defined criteria i.e. clean and dry within an allocated time

  48. Performance Qualification (PQ) • Challenge testing of performance under load conditions • Challenge and establish performance ranges • High & Low/ Min & Max • Challenge and establish conditions of operation • Typical environmental conditions • Typical working volumes • Typical run durations • Sampling test plan • Integration of automated control systems and individual units

  49. Media Simulation • Important step of aseptic processing • Demonstrates that the process, equipment, people and utilities when operating together are capable of reliably producing sterile product. • Bacteria friendly food (Media) is processed through all of the equipment as a challenge. A simulation is likely to include the following steps • Media compounding • Sterilisation of the media by filtration • Filling

  50. Cleaning Validation (CV) • Program designed to ensure that equipment can be cleaned to a pre-defined cleaning acceptance criteria to ensure that any carryover of product does not affect the strength, purity, identity, quality or safety of the subsequent product • Limits for cleaning based on toxiciology of product in body, and consider the risk of transferring small amounts of 1 product into another.