1 / 48

Hybrid Retirement Plans

Hybrid Retirement Plans. University of Illinois September 14, 2005. Introductions. Julie Durkin julie.durkin@watsonwyatt.com Michelle Rorvick michelle.rorvick@watsonwyatt.com Watson Wyatt Worldwide 6,000 associates 90 offices in 32 countries.

izzy
Télécharger la présentation

Hybrid Retirement Plans

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Hybrid Retirement Plans University of Illinois September 14, 2005

  2. Introductions • Julie Durkinjulie.durkin@watsonwyatt.com • Michelle Rorvickmichelle.rorvick@watsonwyatt.com • Watson Wyatt Worldwide • 6,000 associates • 90 offices in 32 countries lf:\J:\act\00022\recruiting\UofI-Champaign\2004-2005\Finance Class\finance360Pres.ppt

  3. What does Watson Wyatt do? • Consult with employers to design, finance and administer benefit plans to attract and retain employees • We balance these needs with the employer’s financial constraints

  4. What does Watson Wyatt do? • Benefits consulting • Retirement • Investment consulting • Group & health care • International • Workforce planning • Communication • Technology solutions • Human capital consulting

  5. Agenda • Hybrid Plans • Cash balance plans • Case Studies • Future of Retirement Plans • Questions

  6. Hybrid Plans • What are they? • Why were hybrid plans created? • Why would an employer be interested in a hybrid plan?

  7. Hybrid Plans • Defined contribution features • Defined benefit features

  8. Hybrid Plans • Characteristics • Defined benefit plans that are made to look and act like defined contribution plans, or • Defined contribution plans that mimic accrual patterns similar to defined benefit plans

  9. Hybrid Plans • Examples • Cash balance plan • Defined benefit plan that expresses a participant’s benefit with a hypothetical account balance • Defined lump sum/Pension equity plan • Lump sum at retirement based on pay credits (age and/or service) • Age/Service based profit sharing plans • Annual employer contributions (% of pay) • Contribution % based on age and/or service

  10. Cash Balance Plans – What is a Cash Balance Plan?

  11. What is a Cash Balance Plan? • Pension plans that define a participant’s benefit as a hypothetical account balance • Combines strengths of Defined Benefit and Defined Contribution Plans • Account grows with annual pay-related credits and interest credits • Employees receive lump sum or annuity at retirement/termination

  12. What is a Cash Balance Plan? Example • Account is established for each employee (hypothetically, no actual asset allocated in the trust) • Each year the account is credited with a deposit equal to 6% of the employee’s pay • Each year the account is credited with interestequal to a public index (5.5%)

  13. What is a Cash Balance Plan? Example Contribution is based on 6% of pay; Salary increases are 4% per year;Interest credits are based on the published rate of 5.5% per year

  14. Comparison of Benefit Accruals

  15. Transition from 1% Final Avg Pay to 6% Cash Balance – Winners and Losers

  16. Cash Balance Plans – Why Do CompaniesImplement Them?

  17. Why Do Companies Implement Cash Balance Plans? • Improve employee understanding and appreciation • Easier to communicate • Complement 401(k) plans • Attract and retain talent • Provide portable retirement benefits • Meets the company’s business strategy • Potential Savings • More stable costs

  18. Cash Balance Plans –Why Do CompaniesAvoid Them?

  19. Why Do Companies Avoid Cash Balance Plans? • Does not meet the company’s business strategy • Uncertainty regarding the future of these plans • Negative press • Transition issues • IBM • Legal issues • IBM (Cooper vs. IBM – age discrimination) • Xerox (Berger vs. Xerox – whipsaw issue)

  20. Legal Issues Cash Balance Plans • Two employees, one age 25, the other age 55 • Each receives a contribution credit equal to $1,000 • Plan provides interest credits at the rate of 6% per year • Age Discrimination claim because 55-year oldreceives a smaller retirement benefit at age 65 • Whipsaw issue if the age 65 account balance is discounted back to current age at a lower rate than 6%

  21. Proposed Pension Reform Legislation • Change the funding of pension plans • Hybrid Pension Plan legislation would: • Retroactively clarify the legal status of hybrid plans for plans that are not currently subject to litigation; • Establish retroactive conversion requirements; and • Establish additional requirements for future conversions.

  22. Case Studies

  23. Six Views • Workforce View • What: Demographic analysis & forecasting to customize recommendations to the unique make-up of your workforce • Why: Averages are misleading; we need to dig into details to know where risks are hidden - where you may have challenges recruiting and retaining over time • Employer View • What: Assess “alignment” by clearly defining “desired state” • Why: Ensure benefits programs meet business and HR goals • Employee View • What: Consider employee expectations and perceptions by distinct segments of your workforce • Why: Perception is stronger than reality…how your programs are perceived is how they ARE • Financial View • What: Assess financial impact and return on investment of current and alternative designs • Why: Understand costs and cost drivers before recommending changes • Environmental View • What: Determine which non-design factors may affect program acceptance • Why: Changes to environmental factors may be more powerful - • and less costly - than changes in design • Competitive View • What: Review position in the relevant marketplace • Why: Ensure that market positioning reflects strategic intent

  24. Sample Conversion Questions Given: • An employer is considering a pension plan redesign. • The plan currently provides a benefit equal to 1.5% of a participant’s final average compensation multiplied by years of service. • The employer is considering a cash balance plan that provides a benefit with pay credits equal to 3% of pay.

  25. Why would an employer consider this change? • Reduced volatility • Less expensive plan on an ongoing basis • Enhanced employee understanding

  26. How will employees view this change? • Reaction will depend on management’s relationship with employees • Employees will want to understand the reason for the change • Reactions will vary dramatically depending on employees’: • Individual situation • Understanding of the current plan and the difference in these types of plans

  27. Other Issues • How will the costs of these programs compare? • Does the proposed plan provide competitive benefits?

  28. Case Study A Current Business Situation • Large manufacturer wants to review current benefit programs • Mature population in decentralized locations • Employer has maintained an extremely paternalistic culture to date

  29. Case Study A (cont.) Current Business Situation • Mostly rural locations where company is major employer in town • Publicly traded company with mandate to reduce costs • Company has grown through acquisitions

  30. Objectives for Retirement Program – Case Study A • Facilitate integration of acquired companies • Share responsibility between employer and employee • Provide minimum floor of protection • Improve perceived value of program • Provide competitive program

  31. Objectives for Retirement Program – Case Study A (cont.) • Improve employee understanding • Provide a program that does not encourage retirement at a certain date • Maintain a cost neutral program

  32. Case Study A – Current Program • Pension Plan: • 2% of Career Average Pay payable at age 65 • Unreduced benefits payable at age 60 • Subsidized early retirement provided at age 55 with ten years of service. • Eligibility is after 1 year of service • Vesting is 100% after 5 years.

  33. Case Study A – Current Program (cont.) • 401(k) Plan: • pre-tax deferrals • 50% match on deferrals up to 3% of pay

  34. Case Study A – Current Costs • Present value of pension benefits for active participants • $1,200 M • Matching contribution • $10 M • Total - $1,210 M

  35. Case Study A • Given this situation, what would your proposed plan design be? • How would your proposed design satisfy the objectives? • How do you think the employer/employees will respond to your proposal?

  36. Employer Proposal • Discussion

  37. Employee Proposal • Discussion

  38. Case Study B Current Business Situation • Two liked size companies merge and a year later merged company acquires three smaller businesses • Logistics company • Company is re-branded • IPO likely in near future • Low margin business • Paternalistic culture at the two original companies

  39. Case Study B – Background • Company A Program • 1.5% final average pay pension plan • 401(k) pre-tax contributions with discretionary matching contribution • a retiree medical and life program • Company B Program • No pension plan • 100% match up to 3% of pay • Smaller acquired businesses • No pension plan • 50% match up to 6% of pay

  40. Case Study B – Objectives • Integration of companies • Build retirement program consistent with business goals • Reduce costs of programs • Create a program which will attract and retain employees • Promote joint responsibility for retirement

  41. Case Study B • Given this situation, what would your proposed plan design be? • How would your proposed design satisfy the objectives? • How do you think the employer/employees will respond to your proposal?

  42. Case Study B – Employer Proposal • Discussion

  43. Case Study B – Employee Proposal • Discussion

  44. Future of Retirement Plans

  45. Future of Retirement Plans • Baby boomers are retiring • Uncertainty regarding social security system • Employer sponsored plans • Phased retirement • Retirement age • Health • Life expectancy • Pension reform

  46. Retirement Consulting • Design retirement programs based on changing objectives • Determine cash flow for plans • Contributions satisfying ERISA requirements • Benefit Payments • Calculate pension expense under FASB # 87 and 132 and IAS #19 accounting standards

  47. Retirement Consulting (cont.) • Calculate benefits • Perform budget planning calculations • Asset liability modeling • Non-discrimination testing

  48. Questions

More Related