Quality and Outcomes Framework Assessor Training
Quality and Outcomes Framework Assessor Training . QOF Basics Domains, Evidence and Local Frameworks. Plan!. Overview of QOF Domains QMAS Sources of Evidence Developing Local Frameworks. QOF Improvement Cycle. Planning. QOF IMPROVEMENT CYCLE. Learning. Action. Review.
Quality and Outcomes Framework Assessor Training
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Quality and Outcomes Framework Assessor Training QOF Basics Domains, Evidence and Local Frameworks
Plan! • Overview of QOF • Domains • QMAS • Sources of Evidence • Developing Local Frameworks
QOF Improvement Cycle Planning QOF IMPROVEMENT CYCLE Learning Action Review
QOF Activities for 2004/5 Feb 2004 Agree aspiration April 2005 Achievement payments made Apr 2004 Pay QPrep and QuIP DES Oct 04 – Jan 05 Annual review visits take place QOF 2004/5 April 2004 QOF goes live April 2004 DH guidance on review visits August 2004 QMAS system goes live & provides monthly feedback End April 2004 Monthly aspiration payments
Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) • New primary care tool and major source of new funding • Four domains - Clinical, organisational, patient experience and additional services • Focused on the improvement of quality and outcomes of patient health • Evidence based indicators
Structure of the QOF 1050 points available • £75 per point 04/05 • £120 per point 05/06 4 Domains: • Clinical • Organisational • Patient Experience • Additional Services
Clinical domain 10 disease areas 550 points Organisational domain 5 areas 184 points Additional Services domain 4 areas 36 points Patient Experience domain 2 areas 100 points Holistic Care, Quality Practice and Access Bonus Points Total 180 points QOF Domains
Clinical Domain • The 76 Clinical Indicators split into 3 types • Structure – e.g is a disease register in place • Process – e.g is the indicator being measured and an appropriate intervention being made – for what % of relevant population • Outcome – how well is the condition being controlled – across what % of the population
Payments • New money in primary care • Aspiration payments (monthly from April 2004) • Achievement (lump sum in April 2005) • £s per point • 2004/05 = £75 • 2005/06 = £120 • List size • Prevalence • Pre-payment verification
IM&T and Data Flows • Practices require an RFA99 compliant clinical system • Reports from QMAS • monthly to PCTs, at least monthly to practices • QMAS reports will, in time, have comparative data on achievement and trends • local and national • Impact of Freedom of Information Act • January 2005
QMAS Quality Management Analysis System
Principles • Not patient based data • Pre-populated with IAU data • Single national system ensures: • High trust and transparent • Changes to QOF scheme can be supported • Payments calculated on a consistent basis for all practices • Single feed to NHAIS payment system • Practice and PCT access to same information based on access rights • Reduced dependence on individual suppliers • Value for money
Automated GP Practice “Manual” Achievement data from clinical system BACS Payment Other achievement data – web interface QMAS Central Server NHAIS Confirm Achievement Payment Agency PCT
QMAS Central Server GP Practice PCT
Evidence • Information the practice must submit in advance of the visit together with guidance for PCO assessors • Grades of Evidence • Indicator • Written Evidence • Assessment Visit • Assessors’ Guidance
Local Frameworks • Who can develop local QOFs? • PMS • APMS • PCTMS • Local variations must have comparable frameworks • Must be points based and add up to 1050
Continued… • Local QOF must be agreed by Director of Public Health or another suitable person • Equally, should be similar reward for similar effort between national QOF and locally agreed variants • All practices participating in a QOF should have a QOF assessment visit
Summary • QOF will drive local quality improvements in primary care • Lay assessors will bring objectivity and patient focus to visits • Local ‘intelligence’ important to know (K2) • Part of a world first!