280 likes | 697 Vues
WELCOME to the B.I.C.M. CERTIFICATION TRAINING Part II. Who we areToday's AgendaWhat we will accomplish by the end of the morningB.I.C.M. - C.C.R. Definition. DESIRABLE BEHAVIORS. Stay on TaskDo Your WorkParticipateModel Appropriate BehaviorStay Awake!. ACTIVITY Getting To Know You. Introduce YourselfTell your role in school settingTalk about the most difficult behavior problem you've ever had to deal with.
E N D
1. BICM Certification Training Part 2
February 19, 2003
2. WELCOME to theB.I.C.M. CERTIFICATION TRAININGPart II Who we are
Today’s Agenda
What we will accomplish by the end of the morning
B.I.C.M. - C.C.R. Definition
3. DESIRABLE BEHAVIORS Stay on Task
Do Your Work
Participate
Model Appropriate Behavior
Stay Awake!
5. ACTIVITYGetting To Know You Introduce Yourself
Tell your role in school setting
Talk about the most difficult behavior problem you’ve ever had to deal with
6. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
7. Research literature on Functional Assessment has roots in how people with Developmental Disabilities (DD) and severe behavior problems were historically supported 1950’s - 60’s support was primarily in institutional settings
Institutional settings often correlated with frequent and severe problem behavior
Most intervention for problem behavior limited to chemical or physical restraint
8. Gradual emergence of evidence that people with developmental disabilities respond to teaching techniques Early emphasis on punishment as a consequence to reduce problem behavior
Concerns about ethics, maintenance of interventions, and absence of replacement skills
9. Several studies published in late 60’s early 70’s demonstrated that self-injurious problem behavior can serve a purpose or function for some individuals Contingent attention demonstrated by Lovaas et al in 1965
Contingent escape from task demands demonstrated by Carr et al in 1976
Rincover et al demonstrated sensory reinforcement and a maintaining contingency for stereotypic behavior (1979); Favell et al (1982) showed sensory consequences as maintaining self-injurious behavior
10. Different theories of motivation for self-injury brought together in a single methodology proposing assessment using functional analysis (Iwata et al 1982) Assessed social attention, escape from demands, and sensory/automatic reinforcement
Methodology use experimental design and presented hypothesized contingencies systematically while measuring effects on behavior
Theory behind approach is behavioral
11. Functional assessment is based on a behavioral approach to psychology Emphasis on the study of what can be directly observed
Priority placed on clearly defining (i.e. operationalizing) what is to be studied and recording observations over time (i.e. data collection)
Tendency to avoid concepts or explanations that rely on internal or unobservable factors
13. FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS ASSESSMENT The Path to a FAA ...
14. LEAST RESTRICTIVE APPROACHtoBehavior ………...
17. Behavior Key Concepts There are 2 Functions of Behavior
18. 1. To Get Something Object, attention (adult/peer) fulfill basic need
19. 2. To Reject Something Protest, Avoid, Escape
21. KEY CONCEPT Change occurs if there is an alternative to replace the problem behavior
22. KEY CONCEPT Behavior is related to the environment
23. CLASSROOM INTERVENTIONS Modifications & Accommodations
24. Behavior Goals Focus on: 1. Reducing frequency of problem behavior
2. Increasing use of alternative/replacement behaviors
3. Developing new skills that remove the need to use old problem behavior
25. Key Points - Goals Measurable
To track progress and to determine if it’s working
26. Goals Example: Sue will learn a system of communication, picture exchange communication system (PECs) and utilize picture exchange to request desired objects or activities on 90% of request situations in a two month period.
27. Behavior Support Plans Why do we do them?
28. Top 5 Reasons to Create a BSP
30. Examples of the New BSPandBlank FormandCompleted Example
31. FAA needed when Serious or Extreme Assaultive behavior
Self-Injurious behavior
Behavior causing serious property damage
Pervasive Maladaptive Behavior
32. Assaultive - physical attacks that are serious and occurring often
Self-Injurious - physical harming self (e.g. cutting, hits self on head, causing nose bleeds and bruising)
Pervasive Maladaptive - serious behavior that interfere with quality of life (e.g. throwing cloths off, projectile vomiting in response to request to perform tasks, school refusal, or school phobia)
34. Information obtained from the
Functional
Analysis
Assessment
May lead to creating a
BIP ……….
35. Overview of FAA Process Part 1 of 2+ step process
Assessment Plan and time lines
Team Roles
Staff Involvement
Know Your Focus
36. Role of BICM CONSULTS
FACILITATES
TRAINS EVALUATES
SUPERVISES
SUPPORTS
37. EDUCATIONAL REVIEW
38. MEDICAL and PSYCHOLOGICAL DATA
39. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
40. Purpose is to identify the most problematic behaviors, the factors in the environment that trigger those behaviors, and to begin to develop hypothesis regarding the purpose (function) the problem behaviors serve (i.e. what are the maintaining reinforcers). Informant assessment (interview)
Descriptive analysis (direct observation)
Experimental analysis (direct manipulation of hypothesized factors)
42. Initial steps that can help environmental analysis go more smoothly Clear operational definitions of behaviors targeted for assessment. All team members should help define behaviors so that all agree on what to observe
Brief inservice with teaching/direct care staff so that staff who interact with student are able to collect data while BICM is off-site
Identify times & settings most associated with problem behavior so that initial observations are more productive
43. Informant assessment is important in providing the details of the context in which problem behavior occurs and in acquiring the hypotheses from those who spend the most time with the student At minimum, should include a person familiar with student in school setting as well as someone familiar with the student outside of school
Interview can be informal, include rating scales, or semi-structured interview forms
Informant data can be used to guide descriptive analysis and supplement observational data for low frequency behaviors
44. An example of a semi-structured interview: The Functional Assessment Interview Form (O’Neill, Horner, Albin, Sprague, Storey, & Newton, 1998) Operational definitions of problem behaviors
Section on ecological setting events
Description of schedules, routines, opportunities for choice and staff support
Detailed questions regarding antecedent events
Section on identifying hypothesized rewards for problem behaviors
Coverage of alternative behaviors, communication skills, and guidelines for effectively working with student
Brief reinforcer survey
History of prior interventions
Summary statements section to translate informant data into hypotheses
45. Descriptive analysis is the process of observing, recording, and summarizing observational data when conducting a functional assessment ABC model of data collection
Use operational definitions to clearly describe behavior of concern
Record details of the environmental factors preceding and following behavior
46. Observational behavior checklist reporting sheets
Blank columns where antecedent, behavior, and consequence information is recorded
Narrative logs
Index cards ABC Data Collection
47. Recording behavior does not require extensive detail if operational definitions have been developed effectively in advance. Additional description of behavior useful when Recording behaviors not previously identified during definition phase
Recording precursor behaviors that sometimes, but not always, lead to more severe problem behavior
As a way of gathering behavioral information of functional alternatives that can be developed during intervention
48. Data collection should occur using several approaches: BICM may want to consider a preliminary observation phase to get initial impressions prior to formal interview and records review
Teacher or classroom staff data collection of data when BICM is unable to observe
Formal direct observation in which variety of times, settings, and intervention contexts are observed by BICM
49. Antecedent information should be recorded in as much detail as possible since antecedents give clues about the functions of problem behaviors and have implications for intervention Immediate event(s) preceding the behavior episode
More general description of environmental setting, including how the setting may contribute to the display of problem behavior
Notes on any setting events that may have contributed on that day (e.g. poor sleep, illness, teasing on bus ride, bad weather keeping student inside during recess, etc.)
51. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS WORKSHEET
52. PHYSICAL SETTINGS: Describe the aspects of the physical/structural environment in which the student spends his/her time
53. SOCIAL SETTINGS: Social aspects of the physical contexts described above What types of social interactions occur and how do those interactions lead to problem behavior?
How does the social context promote functional alternative skills?
Do interactions with certain people or certain styles of interaction lead to problem behavior?
54. ACTIVITIES/NATURE OF INSTRUCTION: What does the instructional context look like?
What requirements are placed on the student and how do skills deficits relate to behavior problems?
What variety of activities are present in the environment?
55. SCHEDULING: When during the day is problem behavior occurring?
Does unpredictability, monotony, or excessive time in one location/block schedule correlate with problem behavior?
56. COMMUNICATION: How do communication deficits relate to problem behavior?
How could communication skills be used more effectively to replace problem behavior?
How does the failure of other students or teaching staff to respond to appropriate communication relate to problem behavior?
58. DEGREE OF INDEPENDENCE: Is the level of independence allowed or support provided developmentally appropriate?
Are student’s needs different from grade level peers?
How does the need for greater independence or more support relate to problem behavior?
59. DEGREE OF PARTICIPATION: Is environment enriched? Does it promote student engagement?
Does level of student participation & motivation prevent problem behavior?
What factors are associated with minimum & maximum participation?
60. AMOUNT/QUALITY OF SOCIAL INTERACTIONS: Is student interaction style active and reciprocated by others?
Are most student interactions inappropriate, ignored, or punished by peers or adults?
61. DEGREE OF CHOICE: How much is student’s choice incorporated into ed supports?
Is student’s participation in IEP occurring appropriate to developmental level?
How are choices made in scheduling student’s activities/tasks, materials used, preferred recreational activities or rewards, breaks from work, etc.?
62. Synthesizing your Information Problem behavior data sheet - Form E
Organize your information
Consider all the data
Ask yourself questions
Consider dynamics
Consider internal/emotional states
Other
63. PROBLEM BEHAVIOR DATA SHEET
64. Developing the Hypothesis Statement about the function of the behavior based on all available information
What you see and why it’s happening
Look to consequences to help understand function
One, or sometimes more than one function
65. CASE EXAMPLES: PRACTICE
66. WHERE ARE WE?
67. FOR FEBRUARY 26: